On Thu, 2020-04-23 at 09:29 -0500, joh...@centos.org wrote:
> > On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, joh...@centos.org wrote:
> > >
> >
> > Thanks Johnny. I'll go with the Stream repos enabled and see how
> > that
> > works out.
> >
>
> For the record .. i just updated to what we have in the QA s
On 4/22/20 9:38 AM, Tony Molloy wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, joh...@centos.org wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University
>> of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you
>> recognize the sender's email address and know the cont
On Wed, 2020-04-22 at 08:25 -0500, joh...@centos.org wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email originated from outside of the University
> of Limerick. Do not click on links or open attachments unless you
> recognize the sender's email address and know the content is safe.
> On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony M
On 4/21/20 2:09 PM, Tony Molloy wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I've just installed a test laptop with CentOS Stream 8.1.
>
> I notice that the default install has both CentOS-Base and
> CentOS-Base-Appstream repos enabled. Is that necessary, or should I
> just have the Appstream repos enabled.
>
Hi All,
I've just installed a test laptop with CentOS Stream 8.1.
I notice that the default install has both CentOS-Base and
CentOS-Base-Appstream repos enabled. Is that necessary, or should I
just have the Appstream repos enabled.
The reason I'm asking is because I'm having trouble upd
On 11/3/2016 10:48 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I just built these servers, and the other admin added some more packages,
then we moved them into the datacenter.
I see errors from a cron job,
Could not get metalink
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-7&arch=x86_64 error
was
14:
Hello Mark,
On Thu, 2016-11-03 at 13:48 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I see errors from a cron job,
> Could not get metalink
> https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-7&arch=x86_64 error
> was
> 14: curl#6 - "Could not resolve host: mirrors.fedoraproject.org; Unknown
> error"
>
>
Frank Cox wrote:
> On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:48:35 -0400
> m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Could not resolve host
>
> DNS lookups are working?
ping centos.org works, as well as nslookup.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.cento
On Thu, 3 Nov 2016 13:48:35 -0400
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Could not resolve host
DNS lookups are working?
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Real D 3D Digital Cinema ~ www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mai
I just built these servers, and the other admin added some more packages,
then we moved them into the datacenter.
I see errors from a cron job,
Could not get metalink
https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-7&arch=x86_64 error
was
14: curl#6 - "Could not resolve host: mirrors.fedorapr
On Thu, May 15, 2014 12:57, Richer, Mark (CIV) wrote:
>
> On May 13, 2014, at 1:27 PM, Darr247 wrote:
>
>> On 13 May 2014 @15:12 zulu, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
>>>
>>>
>>
>> H... how to find Richard Lloyd's script?
>> http://
On May 13, 2014, at 1:27 PM, Darr247 wrote:
> On 13 May 2014 @15:12 zulu, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
>>
>>
>
> H... how to find Richard Lloyd's script?
> http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Install+Chrome+on+CentOS+6
>
> Ah! There it is
On May 13, 2014, at 10:40 AM, Laurent CREPET wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:36 PM, wrote:
> Laurent CREPET wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:12 PM,
wrote:
> >
> > > Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info,
please?
On May 13, 2014, at 10:40 AM, Laurent CREPET wrote:
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:36 PM, wrote:
> Laurent CREPET wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:12 PM,
wrote:
> >
> > > Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info,
please?
On Tue, May 13, 2014 13:25, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Sorry for top posting. Gmail default settings.
>
> On a related note, I now *really* dislike google's accounts. After
> avoiding it for years, I needed to get to a support group for a package I
> was trying to install for a user, so I had to
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 12:25 PM, wrote:
>
>>> a) Please don't top post.
>>> b) Google thinks CentOS 6.x is "too old", and it's an ongoing thing
>>> about people managing or failing to install it.
>>>
>> Sorry for top posting. Gmail default settings.
>
> On a related note, I now *really* dis
On 13 May 2014 @15:12 zulu, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
>
>
H... how to find Richard Lloyd's script?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Install+Chrome+on+CentOS+6
Ah! There it is - http://chrome.richardlloyd.org.uk/
Now, why does Google's algo
Laurent CREPET wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:36 PM, wrote:
>> Laurent CREPET wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:12 PM, wrote:
>> >
>> >> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
>> >>
>> > I think Chrome installs itself its repo settings.
>> > https://www.google.com
>>> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
>>>
>> I think Chrome installs itself its repo settings.
>> https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/
>>
> a) Please don't top post.
> b) Google thinks CentOS 6.x is "too old", and it's an ongoing thing about
> people managing or
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 6:36 PM, wrote:
> Laurent CREPET wrote:
> > On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:12 PM, wrote:
> >
> >> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
> >>
> > I think Chrome installs itself its repo settings.
> > https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/
> >
> a) P
Laurent CREPET wrote:
> On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:12 PM, wrote:
>
>> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
>>
> I think Chrome installs itself its repo settings.
> https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/
>
a) Please don't top post.
b) Google thinks CentOS 6.x is "too ol
I think Chrome installs itself its repo settings.
https://www.google.com/linuxrepositories/
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 5:12 PM, wrote:
> Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
>
> Thanks.
>
>mark
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing
Was it Nux's repo that's got chrome? URL and repo info, please?
Thanks.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Greetings,
I am almost tearing my hear out searching for revisor for Centos 6.
I am aware that SL6 has it. The question is safe to use it?
It seems fedorahosted.org or fedora unity does not have it...
http://files.revisor.fedoraunity.org/
return more or less a blank screen
Any help is apprecia
On 08/10/2012 06:13 PM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just noticed there's a security update for openldap on C6 that's a few
> days old. However my box is not receiving the update. I've checked both
> ftp://ftp.plusline.de and ftp://ftp.nluug.nl. Both have the updates in
> the Packag
Hello,
I just noticed there's a security update for openldap on C6 that's a few
days old. However my box is not receiving the update. I've checked both
ftp://ftp.plusline.de and ftp://ftp.nluug.nl. Both have the updates in
the Packages directory, which has a mod time of 2012-08-08. However, the
co
http://bugs.centos.org/print_bug_page.php?bug_id=4978
Looks like I'm not the only one seeing issue with the repo line from
kickstart.
I don't see a resolution yet though.
Jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/l
On 06/04/2012 02:41 PM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I am trying to get my kickstart "repo" line to function correctly.
>
> repo --name=Updates
> --baseurl=http://192.168.1.14/centos/6.2/updates/x86_64/
>
> When I comment the above line my install works, When I uncomment it
> the install fails
> with a me
I am trying to get my kickstart "repo" line to function correctly.
repo --name=Updates --baseurl=http://192.168.1.14/centos/6.2/updates/x86_64/
When I comment the above line my install works, When I uncomment it the
install fails
with a message about dbus package error.
This is my nightly scrip
http://www.scientificlinux.org/maillists/ is where you can sign up for
the various SL lists...
On 6/29/2011 3:35 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> BeartoothHOS wrote:
>> Not quite OT, I think. On one PC, I'm running Scientific Linux 6,
>> and would like to add one or more additional reposit
On 6/29/2011 3:35 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> BeartoothHOS wrote:
>> Not quite OT, I think. On one PC, I'm running Scientific Linux 6,
>> and would like to add one or more additional repositories for yum a/o
>> PackageKit to draw on. (In particular, at the moment, I can't seem to
>> find
BeartoothHOS wrote:
> Not quite OT, I think. On one PC, I'm running Scientific Linux 6,
> and would like to add one or more additional repositories for yum a/o
> PackageKit to draw on. (In particular, at the moment, I can't seem to
> find an rpm for Pan that doesn't come up against depende
Not quite OT, I think. On one PC, I'm running Scientific Linux 6,
and would like to add one or more additional repositories for yum a/o
PackageKit to draw on. (In particular, at the moment, I can't seem to
find an rpm for Pan that doesn't come up against dependency hell.)
There
Oops, I hadn't intended to hit send, but thanks for the response.
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Ryan J M wrote:
> maybe you can try the old version of loaddap, it depends on libdap
> 3.6.2, according to their descriptions.
Good suggestion, I shoulda thought of it.
> Or compile the new libdap
maybe you can try the old version of loaddap, it depends on libdap
3.6.2, according to their descriptions. Or compile the new libdap
3.9.3 by your own.
Matlab Structs Tool 3.5.2 (28 April 2006)
Binaries
Win32
Win32 package
Mac OS/X
OS/X 10.4(Tiger) package
Intel Mac
Linux
ix
I've got matlab installed:
< M
A T L A B (R) >
Copyright
1984-2009 The MathWorks, Inc.
Version
7.8.0.347 (R2009a) 64-bit
pls advise if there is any repo for i386 or 64bit.
Yahoo!香港提供網上安全攻略，教你如何防範黑客! 請前往 http://hk.promo.yahoo.com/security/ 了解更多!___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:40:28PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>> Error: Missing Dependency: libneon.so.25 is needed by package
>> subversion-1.6.5-0.1.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge)
>>
>> when I try with rpmforge enabled.
>
> Are you disabling the standard repo's when you do that?
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 12:40:28PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Error: Missing Dependency: libneon.so.25 is needed by package
> subversion-1.6.5-0.1.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge)
>
> when I try with rpmforge enabled.
Are you disabling the standard repo's when you do that?
neon-0.25.5-10.el5.i386.rpm is
Is there a 3rd party repo with working eclipse-platform/subclipse
versions? Preferably something compatible with an up to date subversion?
I'm currently getting:
Error: Missing Dependency: libneon.so.25 is needed by package
subversion-1.6.5-0.1.el5.rf.i386 (rpmforge)
when I try with rpmforge e
Christoph Maser pisze:
> Am Freitag, den 21.08.2009, 11:06 +0200 schrieb f...@ll:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was look a yum repository with I add to centos 5.3, where I find
>> bacula with version 2.4.4 or 2.4.4.1
>>
>> f...@ll
>>
>> ___
>> CentOS mailing list
>> Cen
Am Freitag, den 21.08.2009, 11:06 +0200 schrieb f...@ll:
> Hi,
>
> I was look a yum repository with I add to centos 5.3, where I find
> bacula with version 2.4.4 or 2.4.4.1
>
> f...@ll
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.cento
Hi,
I was look a yum repository with I add to centos 5.3, where I find
bacula with version 2.4.4 or 2.4.4.1
f...@ll
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
cen...@911networks.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to run Abiword on CentOS 5.3, any repository?
>
If you want to add my repo for all dependencies the install package is
here :
http://rpm.toshaan.be/repos/el5/x86_64/trpms-1.0-1.el5.x86_64.rpm
I am scheduled to migrate in early July no a new location
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 2:14 PM, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to run Abiword on CentOS 5.3, any repository?
>
I just get it off of http://rpm.pbone.net
First search for mathml-fonts (because libabiword needs them)
Then search for libabiword -- if you've set up Rpm Forge (Dag Wieers)
repository (liba
cen...@911networks.com wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to run Abiword on CentOS 5.3, any repository?
>
EPEL has 2.6.4
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 12:14:28 -0700
cen...@911networks.com wrote:
> I need to run Abiword on CentOS 5.3, any repository?
epel
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.ce
Hi,
I need to run Abiword on CentOS 5.3, any repository?
--
Thanks
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thanx kal, and to all who replied. i have understood the issue better.
>
> > /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo
> >
> > /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo
> >
> > /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-extras.repo
> > /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-misc.repo
> >
> > /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmforge.repo
>
> you can put rpmforge at 10 and
>
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> > On 2/27/09, Linux Advocate wrote:
> >> Guys, what is the best way of arranging the repos with regards to their
> >> priority? Any ideas, especially for all non base ones?
> >>
> >> /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo - priority = 1, 2
On 2/27/09, Linux Advocate wrote:
> Guys, what is the best way of arranging the repos with regards to their
> priority? Any ideas, especially for all non base ones?
>
> /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo - priority = 1, 2
>
> /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo
>
> /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo
>
There have
on 2-27-2009 10:31 AM Kai Schaetzl spake the following:
> Linux Advocate wrote on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:52:13 -0800 (PST):
>
>> /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo
>>
>> /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo
>>
>> /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-extras.repo
>> /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-misc.repo
>>
>> /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmforge.repo
Linux Advocate wrote on Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:52:13 -0800 (PST):
> /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo
>
> /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo
>
> /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-extras.repo
> /etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-misc.repo
>
> /etc/yum.repos.d/rpmforge.repo
you can put rpmforge at 10 and epel and atrpms somewhere at 20,
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> On 2/27/09, Linux Advocate wrote:
>> Guys, what is the best way of arranging the repos with regards to their
>> priority? Any ideas, especially for all non base ones?
>>
>> /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo - priority = 1, 2
>>
>> /etc/yum.re
replies below...
> On 2/27/09, Linux Advocate wrote:
> > Guys, what is the best way of arranging the repos with regards to their
> > priority? Any ideas, especially for all non base ones?
> >
> > /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo - priority = 1, 2
> >
> > /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo
> >
> > /etc
On 2/27/09, Linux Advocate wrote:
> Guys, what is the best way of arranging the repos with regards to their
> priority? Any ideas, especially for all non base ones?
>
> /etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo - priority = 1, 2
>
> /etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo
>
> /etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo
>
> /etc/yum.
Guys, what is the best way of arranging the repos with regards to their
priority? Any ideas, especially for all non base ones?
/etc/yum.repos.d/CentOS-Base.repo - priority = 1, 2
/etc/yum.repos.d/atrpms.repo
/etc/yum.repos.d/epel.repo
/etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-extras.repo
/etc/yum.repos.d/kbs-misc
Vandaman napsal(a):
> I would guess what was said by Dag here
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-January/070168.html
> applies here as well?
Not for everyone, as we tests kernels intensively and on a large volume
of machines, web need easy way. So yum repo is the point, not mentionin
David Hrbáč wrote:
> RH devel kernel from http://people.redhat.com/vgoyal/rhel4 and built
> against Centos tree are available here:
> http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/
> http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/
>
I dont see the point in building
David Hrbáč wrote:
> RH devel kernel from http://people.redhat.com/vgoyal/rhel4
> and built
> against Centos tree are available here:
> http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/
> http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el4/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/
>
I would guess what was said by
David Hrbáč napsal(a):
> Hi,
> RH devel kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ built
> against Centos tree are available here:
> http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/
> http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/
> Regards,
> David Hrbáč
RH d
David Hrbáč wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
> > The problem lies somewhere else: None of the people who use that php from
> > testing are ever reporting back. It is built, but does not get any "thumbs
> > up" (or "thumbs down").
> >
> > Ralph
>
> Ralph,
> you are not right this time. I remem
Ralph Angenendt napsal(a):
> The problem lies somewhere else: None of the people who use that php from
> testing are ever reporting back. It is built, but does not get any "thumbs
> up" (or "thumbs down").
>
> Ralph
Ralph,
you are not right this time. I remember at least 2-3 posts about running
Vandaman wrote:
> Perhaps the OP David Hrbáč's talents can be utilised elsewhere
> in CentOS such as php which people ask for and they are told it
> is in testing for 5 years?
The problem lies somewhere else: None of the people who use that php from
testing are ever reporting back. It is built,
Dag Wieers wrote:
> I would personally recommend to use the upstream kernels
> from Red Hat
> instead. My main motivation is that if you need to report a
> problem, you
> can do so directly to Red Hat without risking it to be a
> specific rebuild
> problem.
>
If those are just 5.3 beta kerne
On Sat, 3 Jan 2009, Vandaman wrote:
> Vnpenguin wrote:
>
>> Is this safe to use ?
>
> You are not obliged to use them. If you are happy with
> the CentOS or CentOSplus Kernel then you do not need
> to install those. There are rare occasions when people
> have issues, they file against upstream bug
Vandaman wrote:
> Vnpenguin wrote:
>
>> Is this safe to use ?
>>
>
> You are not obliged to use them. If you are happy with
> the CentOS or CentOSplus Kernel then you do not need
> to install those. There are rare occasions when people
> have issues, they file against upstream bugzilla and a
Vnpenguin wrote:
> Is this safe to use ?
>
You are not obliged to use them. If you are happy with
the CentOS or CentOSplus Kernel then you do not need
to install those. There are rare occasions when people
have issues, they file against upstream bugzilla and a
test kernel is recommended.
It
2009/1/3 David Hrbáč :
> Hi,
> RH devel kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ built
> against Centos tree are available here:
> http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/
> http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/
Is this safe to use ?
--
ht
Hi,
RH devel kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ built
against Centos tree are available here:
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/x86_64/repodata/
http://fs12.vsb.cz/hrb33/el5/hrb-kernel/stable/i386/repodata/
Regards,
David Hrbáč
__
Akemi Yagi wrote:
Since CentOS strives to be a free, binary-identical version of Red Hat,
how does this process work? I imagine it goes something like this...
Red Hat releases Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 4.6 on some date. I can't
seem to find the date on redhat.com, but according to wikipedia,
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
> Where does the package manager in gnome look for its repos?
>
> I have my local repos, and of course I want to get packages from there.
>
> I have set up yum to use them, but cannot see how the package manager is
> configured.
If you are talking about pirut: It uses yum.
Where does the package manager in gnome look for its repos?
I have my local repos, and of course I want to get packages from there.
I have set up yum to use them, but cannot see how the package manager is
configured.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@
> Since CentOS strives to be a free, binary-identical version of Red Hat,
> how does this process work? I imagine it goes something like this...
>
> Red Hat releases Red Hat Enterprise Linux AS 4.6 on some date. I can't
> seem to find the date on redhat.com, but according to wikipedia, it was
> 1
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Scott Silva wrote:
on 12/4/2007 10:27 AM Bit spake the following:
Hello,
I have two questions which are really CentOS repository related, but
they primarily revolve around the Samba packages available.
1) Why is the s390 architecture version of Samba for CentOS 4
Scott Silva wrote:
> on 12/4/2007 10:27 AM Bit spake the following:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have two questions which are really CentOS repository related, but
>> they primarily revolve around the Samba packages available.
>>
>> 1) Why is the s390 architecture version of Samba for CentOS 4 so much
>> mor
on 12/4/2007 10:27 AM Bit spake the following:
Hello,
I have two questions which are really CentOS repository related, but
they primarily revolve around the Samba packages available.
1) Why is the s390 architecture version of Samba for CentOS 4 so much
more up to date than the i386 architec
Hello,
I have two questions which are really CentOS repository related, but
they primarily revolve around the Samba packages available.
1) Why is the s390 architecture version of Samba for CentOS 4 so much
more up to date than the i386 architecture version? If you open these
two links in a
78 matches
Mail list logo
