On 30/12/2015 18:37, Joey wrote:
Hello,
i follow your discussion. The first 2 posts using multiple default
routes solve my problem perfect.
Thank you all.
J
Thanks for clearing it out Joey!
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.cen
Hello,
i follow your discussion. The first 2 posts using multiple default
routes solve my problem perfect.
Thank you all.
J
Am 2015-12-30 17:21, schrieb Eliezer Croitoru:
On 30/12/2015 10:22, Paul R. Ganci wrote:
On 12/30/2015 12:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
"I want that the request o
On 30/12/2015 10:22, Paul R. Ganci wrote:
On 12/30/2015 12:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
"I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default
gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the
incoming device "
I'm sorry but I have been following this thread fo
On 12/30/2015 12:44 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
"I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default
gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the
incoming device "
I'm sorry but I have been following this thread for a while and
everything that Gordon (a
I'm struggling to understand what you meant when you said that the
destination is the gateway. If you just mean that the traffic is
NATed, then again, I was not assuming that in any of my explanations.
I said that, assuming the host with 2 public ips mentioned in the OP
could be the gateway fo
I may not understood\interpreted the scenario pretty well.
I will try again:
"i have a server with 2 public ips on 2 devices."
He has two servers or two gateways or both??
"I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default
gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gate
On 12/29/2015 07:18 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
... Basic 1:1 NAT ... you have two gateways while you have two ip
addresses or one on the interface.
Just to illustrate the issue: AWS instance with two interfaces which
have two ip addresses NATTED to them by AWS front tier using some kind
of vir
On 28/12/2015 22:47, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Can you explain what you mean? Not only am I not assuming that, I can
hardly conceive of any situation in which a host will receive traffic
for its own gateway.
... Basic 1:1 NAT ... you have two gateways while you have two ip
addresses or one on the
On 12/28/2015 04:50 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
Which means he has 1 server with two gateway devices which each has
it's own broadcast space\network.
It's not clear to me if there are two gateways in the same
broadcast\network or not.
I think it's safe to assume that the two addresses and, nec
On 12/28/2015 01:19 AM, Александр Кириллов wrote:
Are you sure? You assume the destination of the incoming traffic is > the
gateway. What if it isn't?
Can you explain what you mean? Not only am I not assuming that, I can
hardly conceive of any situation in which a host will receive traffic
I still do not understand something.
The thread started with:
i have a server with 2 public ips on 2 devices.
I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default
gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the
incoming device
Could i realize this with firewal
On 12/27/2015 07:49 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
On 27/12/2015 22:49, Gordon Messmer wrote:
While that's true, you still have to select the default route using "ip
rule". And since you can do that using the source address for outgoing
packets, there's no reason to mark them. It's completely red
On 27/12/2015 22:49, Gordon Messmer wrote:
While that's true, you still have to select the default route using "ip
rule". And since you can do that using the source address for outgoing
packets, there's no reason to mark them. It's completely redundant.
Can you match the MAC address?? in ip ru
On 12/26/2015 08:16 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote:
you could use some iptables rules to mark a connection for example by
the source MAC address per new connections which would be a specific
router and by that mark the connection, then in the routing level
decide which default gateway to use for th
On 26/12/15 06:44, Joey wrote:
Hello,
i have a server with 2 public ips on 2 devices.
This is most likely what you are after:
Routing for multiple uplinks/providers -
http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
Cheers,
ak.
___
CentOS
This is half true.
Depends on the application or the way that the network traffic is
flowing you could use some iptables rules to mark a connection for
example by the source MAC address per new connections which would be a
specific router and by that mark the connection, then in the routing
le
On 12/25/2015 12:28 PM, Paul R. Ganci wrote:
you have to tell the packets to go out the proper interface which must
be done via routing tables. For that purpose you need ip route. I
suggest you take a look at
https://kindlund.wordpress.com/2007/11/19/configuring-multiple-default-routes-in-linu
On 12/25/2015 12:44 PM, Joey wrote:
i have a server with 2 public ips on 2 devices.
I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default
gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the
incoming device
Could i realize this with firewalld? Or directly iptables
Hello,
i have a server with 2 public ips on 2 devices.
I want that the request of incoming traffic dont use the default
gateway. Incoming traffic sould be answered using the gateway of the
incoming device
Could i realize this with firewalld? Or directly iptables?
Greeting
J
19 matches
Mail list logo
