Il 2021-06-22 02:34 Gordon Messmer ha scritto:
CentOS Stream is not a rolling release. It gets "rolling updates,"
but that just means that there are no point releases within a major
release, and that updates aren't delayed in order to group rebased
packages together at 6 month intervals.
Hi Go
On 6/21/21 4:53 AM, Gionatan Danti wrote:
Historically the CentOS team refused to provide such metadata due to
the added work required. Now with Stream, and the demise of classic
CentOS, security updates are even less probable (ie: a rolling release
is often wholly updated).
CentOS Stream
If you have received this e-mail in
> error, please notify the sender by return e-mail and
> then delete it.
>
>
>
> From: CentOS on behalf of Gionatan Danti
>
> Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 01:53 PM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Security Updates not proper
> Historically the CentOS team refused to provide such metadata due to
> the
> added work required. Now with Stream, and the demise of classic
> CentOS,
> security updates are even less probable (ie: a rolling release is
> often
> wholly updated).
>
> Regards.
then delete it.
From: CentOS on behalf of Gionatan Danti
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2021 01:53 PM
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Security Updates not properly flagged
Il 2021-06-21 13:34 Pete Biggs ha scritto:
> CentOS does not provide
d the demise of classic CentOS,
security updates are even less probable (ie: a rolling release is often
wholly updated).
Regards.
--
Danti Gionatan
Supporto Tecnico
Assyoma S.r.l. - www.assyoma.it
email: g.da...@assyoma.it - i...@assyoma.it
GPG public key ID: FF5
>
> There are probably more security updates which should be installed by
> yum --security but those are the packages I am most interested in.
>
> Please change as necessary to allow yum --security to work.
>
CentOS does not provide the metadata to allow the --security flag to
work.
It doesn't
Hi,
I assumed that it's possible to install security updates with "yum --security
update".
On the centos-announce mailinglist and I have received several security updates
recently.
Most are not relevant for us but glib2 and kernel are two we would like to
address without updating the whole syst
Le 18/03/2011 01:32, Timothy Murphy a écrit :
> I don't think the OP did ask when 5.6 would be ready.
> What he/she said, IIRC, was that Karanbir had suggested
> that 5.6 would be out last week,
> and he/she was asking if there had been a problem.
This is exactly the point. I can add that all my C
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Timothy Murphy
>Sent: Friday, March 18, 2011 1:33 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>However, I don't think people who ask
On Fri, 18 Mar 2011, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
>> V5.6 will be done when it's done, okay?
>
> I don't think the OP did ask when 5.6 would be ready.
> What he/she said, IIRC, was that Karanbir had suggested
> that 5.6 would be out last week,
> and he/she was asking if there had be
Sorin Srbu wrote:
> Can we please, please, pretty please with a cherry on top, not start this
> dance again?
Don't you think there is something slightly farcical
about posting messages suggesting people should stop posting messages?
> V5.6 will be done when it's done, okay?
I don't think the O
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 1:24 PM, Chris Weisiger wrote:
> I really appreciate all the people involved with the building and rebranding
> of redhat to create the centos distribution. If i had the time and
> dedication, I would definitely put forth the effort to help, but I cant, and
> therefore
--- On Thu, 3/17/11, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> From: m.r...@5-cent.us
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Date: Thursday, March 17, 2011, 11:35 AM
> Alain Péan wrote:
> > Le 17/03/2011 17:25, Alain Péan a écrit :
> &g
Alain Péan wrote:
> Le 17/03/2011 17:25, Alain Péan a écrit :
>> Le 17/03/2011 17:23, Alain Péan a écrit :
>>> Le 17/03/2011 17:19, Tom H a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglieno
wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
>> With all due respect
Le 17/03/2011 17:25, Alain Péan a écrit :
Le 17/03/2011 17:23, Alain Péan a écrit :
Le 17/03/2011 17:19, Tom H a écrit :
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglienowrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready l
Le 17/03/2011 17:23, Alain Péan a écrit :
> Le 17/03/2011 17:19, Tom H a écrit :
>> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglieno wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week,
and planned for the
Le 17/03/2011 17:19, Tom H a écrit :
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglieno wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
>>> With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week,
>>> and planned for the end of the week. One week later, I don't see
>>>
On Thu, Mar 17, 2011 at 12:03 PM, Neil Viglieno wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
>>
>> With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week,
>> and planned for the end of the week. One week later, I don't see
>> anything. I think having some news once
On Thu, 2011-03-17 at 16:34 +0100, Alain Péan wrote:
> With all due respect, the release was announced to be ready last week,
> and planned for the end of the week. One week later, I don't see
> anything. I think having some news once a week is something feasible,
> and I don' want to start a da
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Alain Péan
>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:34 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>With all due respect, the release was an
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of m.r...@5-cent.us
>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:25 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>You beat me to it: *PLEASE* don'
>> To: CentOS mailing list
>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>>>
>>> May I ask the develloppers if we can have some update about the status
>>> of the release, why it was delayed (some problems ?), if if there is any
>>> schdule to release
Sorin Srbu wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
>> Behalf
>>Of Alain Péan
>>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:09 PM
>>To: CentOS mailing list
>>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
>Of Alain Péan
>Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2011 4:09 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] security updates?
>
>May I ask the develloppers if we can ha
Le 17/03/2011 16:02, Hendrik a écrit :
> Hello,
>
> There are several important security updates available:
>
> Critical: firefox security and bug fix update
> Important: tomcat5 security update
> Important: vsftpd security update
> Moderate: subversion security and bug fix update
> Important: logw
Hello,
There are several important security updates available:
Critical: firefox security and bug fix update
Important: tomcat5 security update
Important: vsftpd security update
Moderate: subversion security and bug fix update
Important: logwatch security update
Important: libtiff security update
On 3/9/11 5:45 PM, Mark Foster wrote:
> Hello, I was wondering why there haven't seemed to be any security
> updates for centos-5 since Jan 6. Per
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html there are a ton of
> outstanding issues.
> Thanks.
My solution at least for the kernel, was to g
On Wednesday, March 09, 2011 05:45:22 pm Mark Foster wrote:
> Hello, I was wondering why there haven't seemed to be any security
> updates for centos-5 since Jan 6. Per
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html there are a ton of
> outstanding issues.
> Thanks.
See the on-going threa
On 03/09/2011 04:45 PM, Mark Foster wrote:
> Hello, I was wondering why there haven't seemed to be any security
> updates for centos-5 since Jan 6. Per
> https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html there are a ton of
> outstanding issues.
> Thanks.
All of those apply to 5.6 ( where apply
Hello, I was wondering why there haven't seemed to be any security
updates for centos-5 since Jan 6. Per
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/rhel-server-errata.html there are a ton of
outstanding issues.
Thanks.
--
Mark D. Foster
http://mark.foster.cc/
___
C
Keith Keller wrote on 10/12/2010 06:35 PM:
> Somewhat related to this, does anybody know (or have links to) what
> work, if any, is happening with the yum security plugin? The only
> information I could find was some posts from Karanbir from last year,
> basically saying it was a low priority beca
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 06:11:49PM -0400, John Hinton wrote:
>
> Secure? Yes, as long as you apply the updates as needed. You can always
> read about why there is a patch and decide if it is applicable to your
> situation.
Somewhat related to this, does anybody know (or have links to) what
work
On 10/11/2010 9:17 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: Giles Coochey
>
>> On Mon, October 11, 2010 13:36, Ritika Garg wrote:
>>> I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a
>>> need to have a security update?
>> What is your IP? :-D
> Keep this information secret, but I t
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 2:30 PM, sync wrote:
> I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
CentOS (RHEL 5) is one of the most secure operating systems worldwide.
Best regards,
Morten
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lis
From: Giles Coochey
> On Mon, October 11, 2010 13:36, Ritika Garg wrote:
> > I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a
> > need to have a security update?
> What is your IP? :-D
Keep this information secret, but I think his IP is 127.0.0.1 ...
And there's no fi
At Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:30:04 +0800 CentOS mailing list
wrote:
>
>
>
> I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
If you apply ALL of the security updates as they become available. ALL
O/Ss have security updates from time-to-time (what do you think those
MS-Windows 'Service
On 11/10/10 11:30 PM, sync wrote:
> I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
*Sigh*
If you don't update it then it won't remain so. It's like buying a
brand new deadlock for the door to your house and then leaving the door
wide open when you go out. Chances are that sooner or
Am 11.10.10 14:30, schrieb sync:
> I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
Okay, I'll bite.
>From time to time there are bugs found in the software which CentOS
ships. These bugs can lead your code to crash, your machine to be denied
of service as the process which has the bug
I have the same problem on it . Isn't the CentOS very safe?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, October 11, 2010 13:36, Ritika Garg wrote:
> I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a
> need to have a security update?
> ___
What is your IP? :-D
___
CentOS mailing li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Ritika Garg spake:
> I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a
> need to have a security update?
YMMD.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFMswD6fg746kcGBOwRAtvVAJ9HWjA7ZOMw2TdtFE
I can't understand exactly what these security updates do? Why is there a
need to have a security update?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> nate wrote:
>> slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with Centos
>>> 5.3 x_64.
>>
>> Just run yum update and you'll get all of the updates that
>> you need that are
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:11:20 -0500
From: slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx
Subject: [CentOS] Security updates for Centos 5.3
To: centos@centos.org
Message-ID:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hello,
Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host w
>-Original Message-
>From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf
>Of Torkil Zachariassen
>Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 7:39 PM
>To: CentOS mailing list
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] Security updates for Centos 5.3
>
>On Wed, 2
On 10/21/2009 11:08 PM, Torkil Zachariassen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:11 -0500, slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
>> Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with
>> Centos 5.3 x_64.
>
> Yum knows :)
>$ yum --security check-update
>
> You may have to install yum-s
On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 11:11 -0500, slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
> Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with
> Centos 5.3 x_64.
Yum knows :)
$ yum --security check-update
You may have to install yum-security first:
# yum install yum-security
.t.
___
On Wednesday 21 October 2009, slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with Centos
> 5.3 x_64.
All, that is "yum update" with a standard configuration (note that "All" here
includes updates all the way to 5.x latest (which, as
nate wrote:
> slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with Centos
>> 5.3 x_64.
>
> Just run yum update and you'll get all of the updates that
> you need that are available.
Except that you'll probably end up with 5.4 or may
slchavar...@iusacell.com.mx wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with Centos
> 5.3 x_64.
Just run yum update and you'll get all of the updates that
you need that are available.
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
Hello,
Someone knows which security updates i have to apply to a host with Centos
5.3 x_64.
Thank you in advance and greetings
SLCC
-
Este mensaje y cualquier archivo que se adjunte al mismo es
propiedad de Grupo Iusacell y contiene informacion privad
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, John R Pierce wrote:
Alexander Farber wrote:
You don't know our situation and already have an opinion.
We already spent 40 Euro for SW licenses this year
(and we have only 400 users). And we're an automotive business,
so I can understand that management tries to sa
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 05:02:06PM +0100, Alexander Farber wrote:
> Hello,
>
..
> However we have 4 important SAP-servers running RHEL5
...
>
> Has anybody have been in a similar situation and figured
> out a good way to make "yum update" on RHEL machines
> to work against CentOS repositories?
h
Alexander Farber wrote:
You don't know our situation and already have an opinion.
We already spent 40 Euro for SW licenses this year
(and we have only 400 users). And we're an automotive business,
so I can understand that management tries to save some money.
do you understand that if t
Alexander Farber wrote:
You don't know our situation and already have an opinion.
We already spent 40 Euro for SW licenses this year
(and we have only 400 users). And we're an automotive business,
so I can understand that management tries to save some money.
Regards
Alex
On Sun, Nov 30, 20
You don't know our situation and already have an opinion.
We already spent 40 Euro for SW licenses this year
(and we have only 400 users). And we're an automotive business,
so I can understand that management tries to save some money.
Regards
Alex
On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 7:10 PM, Jim Wildman
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008, John wrote:
And to add to that it will break your Contract with SAP!!!
JohnStanley
I always find the sentiments from the management of the original poster
interesting. They are serious enough about their business to have spent
$$$ on SAP to run the business, then they wa
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kenneth Burgener
> Sent: Sunday, November 30, 2008 11:52 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Installing CentOS security updates to
> RHEL machines?(RHN
Alexander Farber wrote:
Has anybody have been in a similar situation and figured
out a good way to make "yum update" on RHEL machines
to work against CentOS repositories?
The CentOS repositories are just a YUM repository. Simply add the
'.repo' file to your '/etc/yum.repos.d/' folder. You
Hello,
I hope my question is not annoying. I work as sysadmin
at a 400 users firm and we have around 20 CentOS 4/5
servers and VMs and CentOS is awesome, thank you!
However we have 4 important SAP-servers running RHEL5
and our RHN subscription has unforunately expired and
buying it again is not a
61 matches
Mail list logo
