> -Original Message-
> From: S.Bob
> Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2020 2:27 PM
>
> I have almost zero experience with sendmail.
>
I know why I use sendmail, why are you not using postfix? Hint: I would switch
if I could.
>
> I'd be willing to pay someone to set this up for me, interested?
I have almost zero experience with sendmail.
I'd be willing to pay someone to set this up for me, interested? KNow of
someone?
On 4/19/20 12:18 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am 19.04.2020 um 18:28 schrieb S.Bob:
I installed sendmail via yum, but if I test it like this:
echo "Subject: se
Am 19.04.2020 um 18:28 schrieb S.Bob:
I installed sendmail via yum, but if I test it like this:
echo "Subject: sendmail test" | sendmail s...@quadratum-braccas.com
I get a local mail on the server with this every time:
[ ... ]
Hi,
your provided sendmail.mc shows that you have done zero
On 4/19/20 12:38 PM, S.Bob wrote:
On 4/19/20 10:36 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
On 4/19/20 12:28 PM, S.Bob wrote:
All;
I installed sendmail via yum, but if I test it like this:
The original message was received at Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:02:56 -0600
from localhost [127.0.0.1]
- The followi
On Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:28:54 -0600
S.Bob wrote:
>
> (reason: 554 5.7.1 Service unavailable; Client host [50.243.150.81]
> blocked using xbl.spamhaus.org.rbl.local; https://www.spamhaus
> .org/query/ip/50.243.150.81)
Your ip address (50.243.150.81) is being blocked by the email server that
On 4/19/20 10:36 AM, Tim Evans wrote:
On 4/19/20 12:28 PM, S.Bob wrote:
All;
I installed sendmail via yum, but if I test it like this:
The original message was received at Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:02:56 -0600
from localhost [127.0.0.1]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal er
On 4/19/20 12:28 PM, S.Bob wrote:
All;
I installed sendmail via yum, but if I test it like this:
The original message was received at Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:02:56 -0600
from localhost [127.0.0.1]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
(reason: 554 5.7.1 Serv
All;
I installed sendmail via yum, but if I test it like this:
echo "Subject: sendmail test" | sendmail s...@quadratum-braccas.com
I get a local mail on the server with this every time:
Message 1:
From mailer-dae...@kdb-bugs.example.com Sun Apr 19 10:15:00 2020
Return-Path:
Date: Sun, 19
Hi John,
>maybe add a '.' to the end of the host name? that prevents it from
>applying assumed default domains to it
>like this:
>define(`SMART_HOST', `smtp-relay.gmail.com.') dnl
HEAY! This worked. Thanks so much everyone and John. Have a great weekend.
Jerry
See below:
getent hosts smtp-relay.gmail.com
2607:f8b0:4002:c06::1c smtp-relay.gmail.com
# /etc/nsswitch.conf
#
# An example Name Service Switch config file. This file should be
# sorted with the most-used services at the beginning.
#
# The entry '[NOTFOUND=return]' means that the search for an
#
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 6:16 AM Jerry Geis wrote:
> Great thought to check the generated file.
> It looks OK.
>
> grep gmail sendmail.*
> sendmail.cf:DSsmtp-relay.gmail.com
> sendmail.cf.bak:DSsmtp-relay.gmail.com
> sendmail.mc:define(`SMART_HOST', `smtp-relay.gmail.com') dnl
maybe add a '.' to
On Fri, 2019-11-22 at 12:20 -0800, John Pierce wrote:
> and, of course...
>
> $ host smtp-relay.gmail.com
but ...
the originator referred to smtp-relay.gmail.com.com (note the double
"com")
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.ce
and, of course...
$ host smtp-relay.gmail.com
smtp-relay.gmail.com has address 74.125.142.28
smtp-relay.gmail.com has IPv6 address 2607:f8b0:400e:c08::1c
$ whois 74.125.142.28
...
NetRange: 74.125.0.0 - 74.125.255.255
CIDR: 74.125.0.0/16
NetName:GOOGLE
NetHandle: NET-
On Fri, 2019-11-22 at 10:55 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> [smooge@smoogen-laptop ~]$ host -t MX smtp-relay.gmail.com.com
> smtp-relay.gmail.com.com mail is handled by 10 mx203.inbound-mx.org.
> smtp-relay.gmail.com.com mail is handled by 10 mx203.inbound-mx.net.
.w smtp-relay.gmail.com.com
What does getent hosts smtp-relay.gmail.com show? What does your hosts line in
/etc/nsswitch.conf show?
On November 22, 2019 9:55:23 AM CST, Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
>On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 08:22, Jerry Geis wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I am 'trying' to set SMART_HOST in sendmail to point to
On Fri, 22 Nov 2019 at 08:22, Jerry Geis wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am 'trying' to set SMART_HOST in sendmail to point to smtp-relay.gmail.com
> but when looking at the /var/log/maillog its going to mx203.inbound-mx.net.
> [192.110.255.243],
>
That is weird.. and from all the other posts I could fi
Great thought to check the generated file.
It looks OK.
grep gmail sendmail.*
sendmail.cf:DSsmtp-relay.gmail.com
sendmail.cf.bak:DSsmtp-relay.gmail.com
sendmail.mc:define(`SMART_HOST', `smtp-relay.gmail.com') dnl
host smtp-relay.gmail.com
smtp-relay.gmail.com has address 64.233.176.28
smtp-relay
> Date: Friday, November 22, 2019 08:21:57 -0500
> From: Jerry Geis
>
> Hi All,
>
> I am 'trying' to set SMART_HOST in sendmail to point to
> smtp-relay.gmail.com but when looking at the /var/log/maillog its
> going to mx203.inbound-mx.net. [192.110.255.243],
>
> why???
>
> my line from send
Hi All,
I am 'trying' to set SMART_HOST in sendmail to point to smtp-relay.gmail.com
but when looking at the /var/log/maillog its going to mx203.inbound-mx.net.
[192.110.255.243],
why???
my line from sendmail.mc
define(`SMART_HOST', `smtp-relay.gmail.com')
I did make in /etc/mail and service sen
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 7:25 PM, Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 23:18 +, Larry Martell wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:26 PM Stephen John Smoogen
>>
>> > Sendmail is not the standard email server for EL7
>>
>>
>> What is the the standard email server?
>>
>
> Postfix
Thanks. I was
--On Monday, October 02, 2017 6:21 PM -0400 Larry Martell
wrote:
I an running CentOS7 in a docker container. I need to send email from
that container so I installed sendmail and then I run:
m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf` and when I try and
send mail it fails with:
larry.ma
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 3:40 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
> Ok thanks I will try this. But I am not married to sendmail. I will use
> anything that allows me to send mail from the container.
>
Try ssmtp if you are only interest is outbound emails, through some
kind of SMTP relay service (mailgun/sendg
On Mon, 2017-10-02 at 23:18 +, Larry Martell wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:26 PM Stephen John Smoogen
>
> > Sendmail is not the standard email server for EL7
>
>
> What is the the standard email server?
>
Postfix
P.
___
CentOS mailing list
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:26 PM Stephen John Smoogen
> Sendmail is not the standard email server for EL7
What is the the standard email server?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 6:26 PM Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
> On 2 October 2017 at 18:03, Larry Martell wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
> wrote:
> >> On 2 October 2017 at 17:21, Larry Martell
> wrote:
> >>> I an running CentOS7 in a docker container. I need to se
On 2 October 2017 at 18:03, Larry Martell wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>> On 2 October 2017 at 17:21, Larry Martell wrote:
>>> I an running CentOS7 in a docker container. I need to send email from
>>> that container so I installed sendmail and then I run:
On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 2 October 2017 at 17:21, Larry Martell wrote:
>> I an running CentOS7 in a docker container. I need to send email from
>> that container so I installed sendmail and then I run:
>>
>> m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf`
On 2 October 2017 at 17:21, Larry Martell wrote:
> I an running CentOS7 in a docker container. I need to send email from
> that container so I installed sendmail and then I run:
>
> m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf` and when I try and
> send mail it fails with:
>
> larry.mar...@gma
I an running CentOS7 in a docker container. I need to send email from
that container so I installed sendmail and then I run:
m4 /etc/mail/sendmail.mc > /etc/mail/sendmail.cf` and when I try and
send mail it fails with:
larry.mar...@gmail.com... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay...
larry.mar...@
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017, Xinhuan Zheng wrote:
>Today I searched redhat official portal and learned that Sendmail is
>considered deprecated. By default, CentOS 7 will use postfix as MTA. I
>need good advise on what it means to us.
As of today you don't need to do anything, apart from explicitly
in
On 01/04/17 10:40, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> What makes Postfix superior in fighting spam?
One major feature that comes to mind is postscreen:
http://www.postfix.org/POSTSCREEN_README.html
http://www.postfix.org/postscreen.8.html
> How do I integrate MIMEDefang, SpamAssassin, and ClamAV with Postfi
On 01/04/17 09:57, Xinhuan Zheng wrote:
> Today I searched redhat official portal and learned that Sendmail is
> considered deprecated. By default, CentOS 7 will use postfix as MTA.
It is considered "deprecated" as you say, but that does not mean they no
longer support it. You can use Sendmail in
On 03/31/2017 02:57 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Fri, March 31, 2017 4:46 pm, Alice Wonder wrote:
On 03/31/2017 02:40 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On 3/31/2017 2:15 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Well, it sounds like you are one of the companies with whose effort I
have
to fight constantly in my own
On 3/31/2017 2:46 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
I don't know about MIMEDefang but SpamAssassin and ClamAV are pretty
straight forward. There are guides for both with Postfix all over the
net.
MIMEDefang I have not heard of, but unless it does something really
funky I suspect it also is easy to set
On Fri, March 31, 2017 4:46 pm, Alice Wonder wrote:
> On 03/31/2017 02:40 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
>> On 3/31/2017 2:15 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> Well, it sounds like you are one of the companies with whose effort I
>>> have
>>> to fight constantly in my own effort to protect our users from s
On 03/31/2017 02:40 PM, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On 3/31/2017 2:15 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Well, it sounds like you are one of the companies with whose effort I
have
to fight constantly in my own effort to protect our users from spam...
What makes Postfix superior in fighting spam?
How do I in
On 3/31/2017 2:15 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Well, it sounds like you are one of the companies with whose effort I have
to fight constantly in my own effort to protect our users from spam...
What makes Postfix superior in fighting spam?
How do I integrate MIMEDefang, SpamAssassin, and ClamAV wi
On 03/31/2017 01:57 PM, Xinhuan Zheng wrote:
Hello,
Today I searched redhat official portal and learned that Sendmail is considered
deprecated. By default, CentOS 7 will use postfix as MTA. I need good advise on
what it means to us. We are CentOS customers. We use that operating system for
qu
On Fri, March 31, 2017 3:57 pm, Xinhuan Zheng wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Today I searched redhat official portal and learned that Sendmail is
> considered deprecated. By default, CentOS 7 will use postfix as MTA.
That was an excellent decision I welcomed the day RedHat made it.
Beginning with my firat R
Hello,
Today I searched redhat official portal and learned that Sendmail is considered
deprecated. By default, CentOS 7 will use postfix as MTA. I need good advise on
what it means to us. We are CentOS customers. We use that operating system for
quite a few years. We rely on Sendmail for years
Am 30.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb Laurent Blume:
Le 2015/09/30 17:32 +0200, Jerry Geis a écrit:
Hi all,
I set my sendmail.mc file to have a SMART_HOST entry of mail.xyz.com
I do "make" and "service sendmail restart" ... I should be good, but
no. :)
As explained by others, SMART_HOST is used for
Check the config not only in sendmail.mc, but also in submit.mc
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Le 2015/09/30 17:32 +0200, Jerry Geis a écrit:
Hi all,
I set my sendmail.mc file to have a SMART_HOST entry of mail.xyz.com
I do "make" and "service sendmail restart" ... I should be good, but no. :)
As explained by others, SMART_HOST is used for domains for which it has
no information (basic
On Wed, 30 Sep 2015 13:48:12 -0400
Jerry Geis wrote:
> So nothing extra in any files - but then /var/log/maillog instread of relay
> to mail.xyz.com it goes somewhere else.
Where is "somewhere else" and what in what part of the sendmail configuration
do you have somewhere else defined, listed or
>By which you mean that sendmail.cf contains the line:
>DSrelay:mail.xyz.com ?
Yes that is correct.
>SMART_HOST will relay mail to destinations for which it doesn't
have explicit routing information.
> Do you also have a mailertable defined which might include the recipient
domain, for example?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/30/2015 9:32 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I set my sendmail.mc file to have a SMART_HOST entry of
> mail.xyz.com I do "make" and "service sendmail restart" ... I
> should be good, but no. :)
> however when I do a test mail - its trying to RELAY to
Hi all,
I set my sendmail.mc file to have a SMART_HOST entry of mail.xyz.com
I do "make" and "service sendmail restart" ... I should be good, but no. :)
If I do "host mail.xyz.com" I get the correct address and if I "telnet
mail.xyz.com 25" I get
a connection.
however when I do a test mail - its
On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 16:35 +0200, Leon Fauster wrote:
> Am 04.07.2015 um 15:34 schrieb Gregory P. Ennis :
> > On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 08:07 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> > > Everyone,
> > >
> > > Looks like the new version of oppenssl has broken my sendmail's
> > > use
> > > of
> > > tls. Ha
Am 04.07.2015 um 15:34 schrieb Gregory P. Ennis :
> On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 08:07 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>> Everyone,
>>
>> Looks like the new version of oppenssl has broken my sendmail's use
>> of
>> tls. Has anyone else had this problem or seen a fix?
>>
>> Greg Ennis
>> __
On Sat, 2015-07-04 at 08:07 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> Everyone,
>
> Looks like the new version of oppenssl has broken my sendmail's use
> of
> tls. Has anyone else had this problem or seen a fix?
>
> Greg Ennis
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> Ce
Everyone,
Looks like the new version of oppenssl has broken my sendmail's use of
tls. Has anyone else had this problem or seen a fix?
Greg Ennis
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014, John R Pierce wrote:
>On 3/23/2014 11:49 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
>> nslookup NAME.DOMAIN.com 127.0.0.1 I appropriately get 10.0.0.187
>>
>> So far I am stumped on this problem, if any of you have suggestions I
>> would appreciate your help
>
>in your DNS server, create a
On 3/23/2014 11:49 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote:
> nslookup NAME.DOMAIN.com 127.0.0.1 I appropriately get 10.0.0.187
>
> So far I am stumped on this problem, if any of you have suggestions I
> would appreciate your help
in your DNS server, create a reverse zone for 10.0.0.0/8, like,
10.in-addr.ar
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 10:39:34 -0500
I am using a Centos 6.5 machine as a mail server with sendmail as the
MTA. I have a problem with a delay of sendmail presenting its banner so
that the process of accepting e-mail can begin. The log files
demonstrate as much as a 2 minute delay between the co
This is probably being caused by DNS timeout trying to reverse-lookup
the connecting IP. Check that your resolver (/etc/resolv.conf) is set
correctly and responding to e.g. "dig -x [IP-address]" queries in a
timely manner. If you are using DHCP, note that /etc/resolv.conf may
be automatically cre
This is probably being caused by DNS timeout trying to reverse-lookup
the connecting IP. Check that your resolver (/etc/resolv.conf) is set
correctly and responding to e.g. "dig -x [IP-address]" queries in a
timely manner. If you are using DHCP, note that /etc/resolv.conf may
be automatically cre
I am using a Centos 6.5 machine as a mail server with sendmail as the
MTA. I have a problem with a delay of sendmail presenting its banner so
that the process of accepting e-mail can begin. The log files
demonstrate as much as a 2 minute delay between the connection and the
banner presentation.
On Oct 9, 2013, at 11:24 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> You miss at least to have cyrus-sasl-plain.
Bingo! We have a winner! Installing that package and restarting saslauthd and
sendmail fixed it.
> On localhost port 587 really Sendmail is listening? I doubt! It is
> Postfix. Sendmail would ha
Am 09.10.2013 16:17, schrieb Chris Boyd:
>
> On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:33 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>
>>> Make sure you have the sendmail-cf package installed,
>>> else the .cf files can't be rebuild based on modified .mc files. Make
>>> too sure that you have the necessary cyrus-* packages installe
On Oct 9, 2013, at 3:33 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
>> Make sure you have the sendmail-cf package installed,
>> else the .cf files can't be rebuild based on modified .mc files. Make
>> too sure that you have the necessary cyrus-* packages installed.
Yes, got those.
[root@pennzoil mail]# yum lis
>> So anyone able to point out the obvious or not so obvious config
>> mistakes?
>
> I see no mistake. Make sure you have the sendmail-cf package installed,
> else the .cf files can't be rebuild based on modified .mc files. Make
> too sure that you have the necessary cyrus-* packages installed.
>
>
Am 08.10.2013 23:50, schrieb Chris Boyd:
> Hello folks,
>
> I have a CentOS 6.4 installation running Sendmail, and after some serious
> hair tear stare and compare I'm a bit stumped. When I connect to the server
> either with telnet or SSL, sendmail is not presenting the AUTH capability
> aft
Hello folks,
I have a CentOS 6.4 installation running Sendmail, and after some serious hair
tear stare and compare I'm a bit stumped. When I connect to the server either
with telnet or SSL, sendmail is not presenting the AUTH capability after an
EHLO. Everything looks like it should be worki
.. 50)
> the connection starts to get closed by the server
> (centos/sendmail)
>
> I've searched google for a limit configuration on number of
> e-mails in sendmail but didn't find anything.
>
> any ideias on what configuration can i use to allow me to
> s
i have a centos box (vps) with sendmail and i'am using it to
send a newsletter to mail clients.
I'am using a machine in my local network to send the e-mails
via SMTP (AUTH PLAIN) but after sending some e-mail (35 .. 50)
the connection starts to get closed by the server
(cento
I didn't say choice was bad. And I'm perfectly ok with the default mailer
being anything other than sendmail. However, I do use sendmail, and I did
select it during the installation process. My issue is that the sendmail
package does not log anything to the two log files mentioned above. it
use
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 2:56 AM, Tilman Schmidt
wrote:
>>
>> On 01/15/2013 01:00 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>>> Sure, for those who want to run Postfix that's great. In my case, we run
>>> Sendmail. Simple package selection during installation.
>>
>> You said 'stock install'. Selecting a non
> Am 15.01.2013 22:12, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>>
>> On 01/15/2013 01:00 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>>> Sure, for those who want to run Postfix that's great. In my case, we
>>> run
>>> Sendmail. Simple package selection during installation.
>>
>> You said 'stock install'. Selecting a non-de
Am 15.01.2013 22:12, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
>
> On 01/15/2013 01:00 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>> Sure, for those who want to run Postfix that's great. In my case, we run
>> Sendmail. Simple package selection during installation.
>
> You said 'stock install'. Selecting a non-default pack
How would it know which one goes to which line?
daemon /usr/sbin/sendmail -L sm-mta $([ "x$DAEMON" = xyes ] && echo
-bd) \
$([ -n "$QUEUE" ] && echo -q$QUEUE) $SENDMAIL_OPTARG -X
/var/log/sm-mta
versus
daemon --check sm-client /usr/sbin/sendmail -L sm-msp-queue -Ac \
On 1/15/2013 1:29 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Adding -X /var/log/sm-mta and -X /var/log/sm-msp to the appropriate startup
> lines in /etc/init.d/sendmail fixes this problem.
don't modify /etc/init.d scripts from managed packages or you can expect
grief from updates.
instead, put your modifi
Adding -X /var/log/sm-mta and -X /var/log/sm-msp to the appropriate startup
lines in /etc/init.d/sendmail fixes this problem.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:15 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> What I meant was, it's the packages that comes with the installation. As
> in, they are not manually downloa
What I meant was, it's the packages that comes with the installation. As
in, they are not manually downloaded from sendmail.org or done after the
installation.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:12 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 01/15/2013 01:00 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>
>> Sure, for those who
On 01/15/2013 01:00 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> Sure, for those who want to run Postfix that's great. In my case, we run
> Sendmail. Simple package selection during installation.
You said 'stock install'. Selecting a non-default package is no longer
'stock'. In My Highly Biased Opinion.
Yes it logs via syslog, however if it isn't told to log data to sm-mta and
sm-msp, no amount of syslog directive is going to do that. It's something
with the CentOS sendmail package that's disabling that.
When I do a stock Fedora install, I get three separate log files:
/var/log/m
Doesn't really matter, though...Sendmail logs via syslog, and syslog
usually defaults, on a RH/CentOS system, to /var/log/maillog.
Double check /etc/rsyslog.log to be sure.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
"It's always suicide-mission this, save-the-planet that. No one ever just
stop
Sure, for those who want to run Postfix that's great. In my case, we run
Sendmail. Simple package selection during installation.
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
> On 01/15/2013 12:43 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
>
>> I'm baffled ... on a stock 6.3 install, where doe
Try var/log
My maillog is stored there..
john
On 1/15/2013 3:43 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> I'm baffled ... on a stock 6.3 install, where does sendmail dump its log
> files sm-mta and sm-msp respectively? Al I can find is the statistics file
> and maillog.
>
> Thanks,
> __
On 01/15/2013 12:43 PM, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
> I'm baffled ... on a stock 6.3 install, where does sendmail dump its log
> files sm-mta and sm-msp respectively? Al I can find is the statistics file
> and maillog.
My understanding is that Postfix has replaced Sendmail. At least on my
6.3 in
I'm baffled ... on a stock 6.3 install, where does sendmail dump its log
files sm-mta and sm-msp respectively? Al I can find is the statistics file
and maillog.
Thanks,
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/c
On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 2:31 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
>
> The list of sources is far too long to include in a message to the
> list. Suffice to say that each IP address is automatically blocked
> for varying lengths of time following any failed attempt. What I am
> trying to discover is what
On Thu, September 20, 2012 11:10, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I'm not real good with smtp, but it looks as though someone from
> Spain is trying to directly connect to your smtp server. Unless
> you know that they're legitimately using your system, I'd block
> that IP now.
>
The list of sources is
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, James B. Byrne wrote:
Recently we began seeing lots of these log entries on our off-site
mx smtp host. I have googled this but I am not clear from what I
have read if this is something we can stop altogether or should even
worry about.
WARNING Possible Attack:
A
James B. Byrne wrote:
> Recently we began seeing lots of these log entries on our off-site mx
> smtp host. I have googled this but I am not clear from what I have
> read if this is something we can stop altogether or should even worry
> about.
>
> Comments?
>
I'm not real good with smtp, but it lo
Recently we began seeing lots of these log entries on our off-site mx
smtp host. I have googled this but I am not clear from what I have
read if this is something we can stop altogether or should even worry
about.
Comments?
Logwatch. . .
- sendmail Begin -
Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
>
>> {snip}
>>
>> So what have I missed?
>>
> Are you doing the test that fails as the 'EXPOSED_USER' in sendmail.mc
> (i.e. root)? That is for intentional exceptions to MASQUERADE_AS so
> you can tell where system
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Ken Smith wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'm usually quite good with sendmail on Centos 5.8 but I must have
> missed something here. I've not done this before but, I want to set
> sendmail so that its outgoing mail appears to come from the domain of
> the network it lives on
Hi All,
I'm usually quite good with sendmail on Centos 5.8 but I must have
missed something here. I've not done this before but, I want to set
sendmail so that its outgoing mail appears to come from the domain of
the network it lives on. Its real hostname is server2.domain.co.uk ( the
domain b
On 6/15/2012 9:10 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
> Thanks guys!, John you can send me a simple filter for fail2ban+SMTP? I
> tried use the following filters, but this is no sufficient for my yet.
>
>
> */etc/fail2ban/filter.d/sendmail.conf*
>
> [Definition]
> failregex = \[\], reject.*\.\.\. Relaying d
Thanks guys!, John you can send me a simple filter for fail2ban+SMTP? I
tried use the following filters, but this is no sufficient for my yet.
*/etc/fail2ban/filter.d/sendmail.conf*
[Definition]
failregex = \[\], reject.*\.\.\. Relaying denied
(User unknown)\n* \[\]
badlo
On 6/14/2012 8:58 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
> The problem with my server is: I use it to offer webhosting services. Some
> customers using Outlook are blocked because they use black listed ips (ips
> simply are dynamic).
>
>
That is the same problem I am dealing with. You have to set up a dual
ma
On 06/15/2012 09:33 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 06/15/12 9:25 AM, Shiv. Nath wrote:
>> 1.) install& configure fail2ban
> each of the connections shown in the log fragment was from a different
> IP. how would fail2ban help?
>
>
>
If you were to switch to postfix, I believe that postscreen may
John R Pierce wrote:
> On 06/15/12 9:25 AM, Shiv. Nath wrote:
>> 1.) install& configure fail2ban
>
> each of the connections shown in the log fragment was from a different
> IP. how would fail2ban help?
>
Interesting - I hadn't looked that closely. You're right - if it's one
attack, it's a distri
Shiv. Nath wrote:
> On 6/14/12 11:33 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
>> Dear CentOS Community
>>
>> Is totally clear there's no support sendmail platform today, but I need
>> to stop SMTP brute-force attack on sendmail. My server is attacked today,
>> my maillog look like :
>>
>> 4...@myserver.com>, pro
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Shiv. Nath
wrote:
> >>
>> I need help for STOP this spamers right now.
>>
>> Thanks in advance to anyone who can guide me
[...]
> i trust this helps, there is another solution but you do not use Postfix.
Sendmail is nearly infinitely configurable - and not all t
On 6/15/12 2:03 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
>> The problem with my server is: I use it to offer webhosting services. Some
>> customers using Outlook are blocked because they use black listed ips (ips
>> simply are dynamic).
>>
> Give them login
On 06/15/12 9:25 AM, Shiv. Nath wrote:
> 1.) install& configure fail2ban
each of the connections shown in the log fragment was from a different
IP. how would fail2ban help?
--
john r pierceN 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
On 6/14/12 11:33 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
> Dear CentOS Community
>
> Is totally clear there's no support sendmail platform today, but I need to
> stop SMTP brute-force attack on sendmail. My server is attacked today, my
> maillog look like :
>
> 4...@myserver.com>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, rela
On 06/14/12 5:58 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
> The problem with my server is: I use it to offer webhosting services. Some
> customers using Outlook are blocked because they use black listed ips (ips
> simply are dynamic).
They should be using smtp auth over SASL, or they should be using their
ISP'
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Gustavo Lacoste wrote:
> The problem with my server is: I use it to offer webhosting services. Some
> customers using Outlook are blocked because they use black listed ips (ips
> simply are dynamic).
>
Give them logins/passwords and only rely if the connection is
1 - 100 of 485 matches
Mail list logo
