On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Matt Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> David Hrbác wrote:
>>
>> > Ruslan Sivak napsal(a):
>> >
>> > > We are building an exchange cluster with two front end Outlook Web
>> Access servers.
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:03 AM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Hrbác wrote:
>
> > Ruslan Sivak napsal(a):
> >
> > > We are building an exchange cluster with two front end Outlook Web
> Access servers. We would like to at least have some sort of failover, and
> prefereably load bal
David Hrbác wrote:
Ruslan Sivak napsal(a):
We are building an exchange cluster with two front end Outlook Web
Access servers. We would like to at least have some sort of
failover, and prefereably load balancing for them.
Russ
Russ,
take a look at
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_p
Ruslan Sivak napsal(a):
We are building an exchange cluster with two front end Outlook Web
Access servers. We would like to at least have some sort of failover,
and prefereably load balancing for them.
Russ
Russ,
take a look at http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.2/mod/mod_proxy_balancer.html
Da
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:07 PM, Ruslan Sivak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are building an exchange cluster with two front end Outlook Web Access
> servers. We would like to at least have some sort of failover, and
> prefereably load balancing for them.
>
> The MS recommended way is to use NLB
We are building an exchange cluster with two front end Outlook Web
Access servers. We would like to at least have some sort of failover,
and prefereably load balancing for them.
The MS recommended way is to use NLB, but for various reasons that's not
working with our set up.
We are looking
6 matches
Mail list logo
