On 24 November 2010 08:51, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Yes, I used scp as a quick simple test. What would give me better
> performance though?
netcat, ftp. Anything that has low overhead (unlike encryption on a
single thread)
--
Hakan (m1fcj) - http://www.hititgunesi.org
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> Yes, I used scp as a quick simple test. What would give me better
> performance though?
Well, anything that doesn't encrypt would be worth a shot.
Here's a basic scp to /dev/null
scp /tmp/tempfile othermachine:/dev/null
tempfile
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 10:35 AM, John Hodrien wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
>
>> r...@zaxen02.securehosting.co.za:/vm/xen/template/centos-5-x64-cpanel
>> r...@zaxen02.securehosting.co.za:/
>> r...@zaxen02.securehosting.co.za's password:
>> centos-5-x64-cpanel.tar.gz
>>
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> r...@zaxen02.securehosting.co.za:/vm/xen/template/centos-5-x64-cpanel
> r...@zaxen02.securehosting.co.za:/
> r...@zaxen02.securehosting.co.za's password:
> centos-5-x64-cpanel.tar.gz
>100% 1163MB
> 29.1MB
would like some input on this one please.
Two CentOS 5.5 XEN servers, with 1GB NIC's, connected to a 1GB switch
transfer files to each other at about 30MB/s between each other.
Both servers have the following setup:
CentOS 5.5 x64
XEN
1GB NIC's
7200rpm SATA HDD's
The hardware configuration can't
5 matches
Mail list logo