On 2008-09-02 14:07, John Kordash wrote:
What is an alternative X window manager, supported by CentOS,
that has very small memory footprint?
I want to avoid twm, because it defaults to interactive placement when
not giving geometry options. No other requirements.
You found twm's 'RandomPlacme
> What is an alternative X window manager, supported by CentOS,
> that has very small memory footprint?
>
> I want to avoid twm, because it defaults to interactive placement when
> not giving geometry options. No other requirements.
You found twm's 'RandomPlacment' unsuitable?
-John
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Paul Bijnens
Sent: Dienstag, 2. September 2008 11:02
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] small window manager
What is an alternative X window manager, supported by CentOS,
that has very small memory footprint
Paul Bijnens wrote:
What is an alternative X window manager, supported by CentOS,
that has very small memory footprint?
I want to avoid twm, because it defaults to interactive placement when
not giving geometry options. No other requirements.
dwm, fwm, xfce, fluxbox?
ps: your signature is
On Tue, 2008-09-02 at 11:01 +0200, Paul Bijnens wrote:
> What is an alternative X window manager, supported by CentOS,
> that has very small memory footprint?
>
> I want to avoid twm, because it defaults to interactive placement when
> not giving geometry options. No other requirements.
Within C
What is an alternative X window manager, supported by CentOS,
that has very small memory footprint?
I want to avoid twm, because it defaults to interactive placement when
not giving geometry options. No other requirements.
--
Paul Bijnens, xplanation Technology ServicesTel +32 16 397.
6 matches
Mail list logo