I was just wondering if there are special tricks people do
that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or something else I dont
about that minimizes your compile time? I presently have and AMD x2
4800+ with 2GIG ram.
Just curious if I can reduce any more time out of my compiles.
Jerry
___
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:36:39 -0500
Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just wondering if there are special tricks people do
> that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or something else I dont
> about that minimizes your compile time? I presently have and AMD x2
> 4800+ with 2GIG
On Nov 29, 2007 10:36 PM, Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just wondering if there are special tricks people do
> that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or something else I dont
> about that minimizes your compile time? I presently have and AMD x2
> 4800+ with 2GIG ram.
# mak
Jerry,
--- Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just wondering if there are special tricks
> people do
> that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or
> something else I dont
> about that minimizes your compile time? I presently
> have and AMD x2
> 4800+ with 2GIG ram.
>
> Just cur
pecial tricks for developers box on centos 5
Jerry,
--- Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was just wondering if there are special tricks
> people do
> that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or
> something else I dont
> about that minimizes your compile time? I
Frank Cox wrote:
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 16:36:39 -0500
Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I was just wondering if there are special tricks people do
that compile A LOT on centos? Do RAM disks help or something else I dont
about that minimizes your compile time? I presently have and AMD x2
4
>
> I think it's just too new and shiny. ccache is installed by default with
> Fedora 8.
>
Wow, fedora 8?
Where have I been?
Sheesh, most of us are still dealing with considering centos 5 migrations
from rock solid centos 4 "as necessary" eh?
Isn't this fedora thing getting a little bit "cat
ccache does not appear to be part of the centos base or core or whatever you
wanna call it
I see that karan and dag have it in their space
Is there any downside to installing ccache?
If so, in what terms?
How about on an internet facing box?
- rh
_
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 20:26:21 -0500
Jerry Geis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank - HEY that is fantastic Dropped complete compile from 27
> seconds to 14.
>
> I was not aware of this...
Oddly enough, a lot of people don't seem to be aware of it. I think it's right
up there with sliced brea
On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:25:47 -0800
Robert - elists <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ccache does not appear to be part of the centos base or core or whatever you
> wanna call it
I think it's just too new and shiny. ccache is installed by default with
Fedora 8.
> Is there any downside to installing c
On Thu, 2007-11-29 at 19:01 -0800, Robert - elists wrote:
> >
> > I think it's just too new and shiny. ccache is installed by default with
> > Fedora 8.
> >
>
> Wow, fedora 8?
>
> Where have I been?
>
> Sheesh, most of us are still dealing with considering centos 5 migrations
> from rock soli
11 matches
Mail list logo
