On 02/28/2014 06:30 AM, Mauricio Tavares wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Phelps, Matt mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu wrote:
I'd highly recommend getting a NetApp storage device for something that big.
It's more expensive up front, but the amount of heartache/time saved in the
long run is
Hi,
over time the requirements and possibilities regarding filesystems
changed for our users.
currently I'm faced with the question:
What might be a good way to provide one big filesystem for a few users
which could also be enlarged; backuping the data is not the question.
Big in that context
I'd highly recommend getting a NetApp storage device for something that big.
It's more expensive up front, but the amount of heartache/time saved in the
long run is WELL worth it.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:15 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator
goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 8:55 AM, Phelps, Matt mphe...@cfa.harvard.edu wrote:
I'd highly recommend getting a NetApp storage device for something that big.
It's more expensive up front, but the amount of heartache/time saved in the
long run is WELL worth it.
My vote would be for a
Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator goetz.reini...@filmakademie.de a écrit :
Hi,
snip
If you are to have an ever-growing volume, I’d suggest some
distributed FS, like glusterfs, moosefs, lustre…
You need more space ? Add a box.
We do use happily moosefs at work for a couple years (begun with a
On 02/28/2014 08:15 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
...
Big in that context is up to couple of 100 TB may be.
...
From my POV I could e.g. use hardware raidboxes, and use LVM and
filesystem growth options to extend the final share, but what if one of
the boxes crash totally? The
On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator
What might be a good way to provide one big filesystem for a few users
which could also be enlarged; backuping the data is not the question.
Really? Does that mean you already have a backup, don't care if you
lose it, or that you
- Original Message -
| Hi,
|
| over time the requirements and possibilities regarding filesystems
| changed for our users.
|
| currently I'm faced with the question:
|
| What might be a good way to provide one big filesystem for a few
| users
| which could also be enlarged; backuping
On 28.02.2014 13:15, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
Hi,
over time the requirements and possibilities regarding filesystems
changed for our users.
currently I'm faced with the question:
What might be a good way to provide one big filesystem for a few users
which could also be
9 matches
Mail list logo