Re: [CentOS] the 5.2 loaders

2009-04-08 Thread Scott Silva
on 4-6-2009 9:32 AM Karanbir Singh spake the following: > Just looking around at log files and other places, I noticed today that > there are still a lot of people installing and downloading 5.2. > > While a large number of installs would be since people already have the > 5.2 media - thats fine

Re: [CentOS] the 5.2 loaders

2009-04-06 Thread Sorin Srbu
>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Joseph L. Casale >Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 6:41 PM >To: 'CentOS mailing list' >Subject: Re: [CentOS] the 5.2 loaders > >What happens to their "

Re: [CentOS] the 5.2 loaders

2009-04-06 Thread Sorin Srbu
>-Original Message- >From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf >Of Karanbir Singh >Sent: Monday, April 06, 2009 6:32 PM >To: CentOS mailing list >Subject: [CentOS] the 5.2 loaders > >What can we do in order to better, faster, more

Re: [CentOS] the 5.2 loaders

2009-04-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Brian Mathis wrote on Mon, 6 Apr 2009 13:42:59 -0400: > The centos.org page doesn't have a news section in any obvious place, > and the CentOS 5 section only just has the version number updated. If > someone were not following the mailing lists or missed the > announcement that one day on a news

Re: [CentOS] the 5.2 loaders

2009-04-06 Thread Brian Mathis
On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 12:32 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > Just looking around at log files and other places, I noticed today that > there are still a lot of people installing and downloading 5.2. > > While a large number of installs would be since people already have the > 5.2 media - thats fine, h

Re: [CentOS] the 5.2 loaders

2009-04-06 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Karanbir Singh wrote on Mon, 06 Apr 2009 17:32:25 +0100: > What can we do in order to better, faster, more visibly communicate the > fact that 5.3 is the new target most people should be focusing on. Point all "visible" 5.2 stuff to 5.3 and add a "if you are really looking for 5.2 and not the 5

Re: [CentOS] the 5.2 loaders

2009-04-06 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>I would say that people know that 5.2 work and looking at changelogs, >they don't see a real NEED to install 5.3. I personally always have >the newest release though. What happens to their "5.2" the first time they use yum? ___ CentOS mailing list CentO

Re: [CentOS] the 5.2 loaders

2009-04-06 Thread forum
ually out. Maybe digg.com... Etc. --Original Message-- From: Karanbir Singh Sender: centos-boun...@centos.org To: CentOS Mailing list ReplyTo: CentOS Mailing list Sent: Apr 6, 2009 12:32 Subject: [CentOS] the 5.2 loaders Just looking around at log files and other places, I noticed today

[CentOS] the 5.2 loaders

2009-04-06 Thread Karanbir Singh
Just looking around at log files and other places, I noticed today that there are still a lot of people installing and downloading 5.2. While a large number of installs would be since people already have the 5.2 media - thats fine, however, new downloads for 5.2 media today makes little sense (