>If I use BitTorrent to download the DVD image from
>tracker.centos.org, I assume the file has to be complete
>or could it still be missing something?
I fetched my dvd's yesterday via bittorrent perfectly fine...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi,
I could download from the following torrents:
http://sunsite.rediris.es/mirror/CentOS/5.4/isos/x86_64/CentOS-5.4-x86_64-bin-DVD.torrent
http://sunsite.rediris.es/mirror/CentOS/5.4/isos/i386/CentOS-5.4-i386-bin-DVD.torrent
The download was very quick, maybe because I'm now on business trip in
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 02:06:58PM +0800, CentOS List wrote:
>
> If you had try harder and try them all, you should be able to find these
> mirrors with 5.4 in them.
>
> http://centos.cs.wisc.edu/pub/mirrors/linux/centos/5.4/
> http://mirror.highspeedweb.net/CentOS/5.4/
> http://mirror.sanctuaryh
> i've checked a couple dozen random mirrors, and have yet to find
> it. i'm almost tempted to ask, "any idea on when 5.4 will be
> available?", but i just *know* that would get me in trouble.
If you had try harder and try them all, you should be able to find these
mirrors with 5.4 in them.
htt
On Mon, 19 Oct 2009, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> On Sun, 18 Oct 2009, Miguel Medalha wrote:
>
> > I am burning the DVD ISO image to disk right now. It is available
> > from some mirrors.
>
> i've checked a couple dozen random mirrors, and have yet to find
> it. i'm almost tempted to ask, "any idea
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009, Miguel Medalha wrote:
> I am burning the DVD ISO image to disk right now. It is available
> from some mirrors.
i've checked a couple dozen random mirrors, and have yet to find it.
i'm almost tempted to ask, "any idea on when 5.4 will be available?",
but i just *know* that w
>> I am burning the DVD ISO image to disk right now. It is available from
>> some mirrors.
>which are mostly incomplete... maybe some isos are ok but even the
centos.org
>machines are not yet in sync...
>I would strongly suggest that you wait for the actual announcements, but
ymmv.
This leads me
Irrespective of the discussions about the release procedure and visibility,
etc, I'd like to thank everyone that put effort into making the CentOS 5.4
release happen..
I know I won't be alone in wishing to express thanks.
___
CentOS mailing l
> I would strongly suggest that you wait for the actual announcements, but ymmv.
>
I noticed that the mirrors that don't have the images complete don't
even allow you to enter the 5.4 directory.
This particular one does and the checksum files check OK.
The checksum files are also there. SHA and MD5.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 09:48:46PM +0100, Miguel Medalha wrote:
> I am burning the DVD ISO image to disk right now. It is available from
> some mirrors.
which are mostly incomplete... maybe some isos are ok but even the centos.org
machines are not yet in sync...
I would strongly suggest that yo
I am burning the DVD ISO image to disk right now. It is available from
some mirrors.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> "Windows 7 coming soon!!!"
>> no date. no reason. Just churn.
>
> Windows 7 will be out on the 22nd Oct 2009. Your local computer
> Shop did not try hard enough to find this out?
I think the store's aim was to generate a "Cool. When?" response from
clients to draw them into the store so a sal
>>
>> at the risk of picking at that scab a bit longer, i'm going to toss
>> out a comment regarding people still waiting for the public
>> availability of centos 5.4.
>>
>> here:
>>
>> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083743.html
>>
>About ten minutes after your email, I got
On Sun, 18 Oct 2009, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> at the risk of picking at that scab a bit longer, i'm going to toss
> out a comment regarding people still waiting for the public
> availability of centos 5.4.
>
> here:
>
> http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083743.html
About
> Here's the way I'm going to take care of the "problem." Figure eight
> weeks out for CentOS from the time Red Hat is released. If it gets
> done quicker than that, I've got a bonus.!
...and ignore any "announcements" in the meantime, as they may be red-herrings?
Take a "I'll believe it when I
amusingly, only 41 minutes ago, this from centos twitter:
"we ran into a few issues on internal centos.org machines - all
resolved now :) we should start seeding to external mirrors shortly"
and *that's* what i was talking about -- we just want to be kept
informed. thanks.
rday
--
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 2:54 AM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> again, whether people are being paid to do any of this work is not
> relevant. it's important, from the perspective of reputation, that
> everyone see the centos project as being efficiently and competently
> run, and making what *appea
at the risk of picking at that scab a bit longer, i'm going to toss
out a comment regarding people still waiting for the public
availability of centos 5.4.
here:
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2009-October/083743.html
we read:
"The last status (from twitter) is 2 days old with th
19 matches
Mail list logo
