Mmm, top posting. I'd rather not do it but
What I describe does not pollute the base install, and using a container
seems over the top.
Cheers,
Cliff
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Daniel Condomitti
wrote:
> Have you thought of doing this in a Linux container to avoid tainting the
> ba
On 02/04/14 11:16, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> I understand (I think), but is it easy to tell me, or is there a
> *reliable*, *vetted* source, describing for intermediate users how to
> actually do this? i.e.:
> 1) When you say "Try just core and EPEL packages to start with", are you
> talking ab
On 4/1/2014 4:10 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
> Tom Robinson
> IT Manager/System Administrator
>
> MoTeC Pty Ltd
>
> 121 Merrindale Drive
> Croydon South
> 3136 Victoria
> Australia
>
> T: +61 3 9761 5050
> F: +61 3 9761 5051
> E: tom.robin...@motec.com.au
>
> On 01/04/14 19:04, Bennett Haselton wrote:
Have you thought of doing this in a Linux container to avoid tainting the base
install?
On Tuesday, April 1, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote:
> Another approach used by people who want to use CPAN a lot, is to download
> and install Perl from source to say /usr/local, and point CPAN at that
Another approach used by people who want to use CPAN a lot, is to download
and install Perl from source to say /usr/local, and point CPAN at that.
That way you get the benefits of the latest Perl and CPAN without it
fighting with yum/rpm.
Your hashbang line in each Perl script that uses the altern
Tom Robinson
IT Manager/System Administrator
MoTeC Pty Ltd
121 Merrindale Drive
Croydon South
3136 Victoria
Australia
T: +61 3 9761 5050
F: +61 3 9761 5051
E: tom.robin...@motec.com.au
On 01/04/14 19:04, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On 3/31/2014 10:42 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
>> On 01/04/14 16:
On 01/04/14 17:29, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/31/2014 11:13 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
>> I used to stick to the packages only approach but came up against more
>> issues that way. I also spent
>> a lot of time compiling and build packages. At the end of the day, CPAN
>> consistently built a very
>
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 1:29 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/31/2014 11:13 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
>> I used to stick to the packages only approach but came up against more
>> issues that way. I also spent
>> a lot of time compiling and build packages. At the end of the day, CPAN
>> consistently
On 04/01/14 02:13, Tom Robinson wrote:
> On 01/04/14 16:57, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 3/31/2014 10:50 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
>>> Others may see it differently but personally I would install packages
>>> only from CentOS and the rest from CPAN
>> If possible, I would install ONLY packages from C
On 3/31/2014 10:42 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
> On 01/04/14 16:19, Bennett Haselton wrote:
>> On 3/31/2014 7:56 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
>>> Can you verify to which packages thefiles belong?
>>>
>>> Try using RPM:
>>>
>>> rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Net/IP.pm
>> On the old machine:
>> perl
On 3/31/2014 11:13 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
> I used to stick to the packages only approach but came up against more issues
> that way. I also spent
> a lot of time compiling and build packages. At the end of the day, CPAN
> consistently built a very
> tidy environment
the problem with CPAN is it
On 01/04/14 16:57, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/31/2014 10:50 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
>> Others may see it differently but personally I would install packages only
>> from CentOS and the rest
>> from CPAN
> If possible, I would install ONLY packages from Centos and EPEL and
> avoid CPAN entirely.
On 3/31/2014 10:50 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
> Others may see it differently but personally I would install packages only
> from CentOS and the rest
> from CPAN
If possible, I would install ONLY packages from Centos and EPEL and
avoid CPAN entirely. if you absolutely need something thats not in
On 01/04/14 16:43, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/31/2014 10:20 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
>> On 3/31/2014 8:10 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>>> On 3/31/2014 7:56 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
Can you verify to which packages thefiles belong?
Try using RPM:
rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendo
On 3/31/2014 10:20 PM, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On 3/31/2014 8:10 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
>> On 3/31/2014 7:56 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
>>> Can you verify to which packages thefiles belong?
>>>
>>> Try using RPM:
>>>
>>> rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Net/IP.pm
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> rpm -q
On 01/04/14 16:19, Bennett Haselton wrote:
> On 3/31/2014 7:56 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
>> Can you verify to which packages thefiles belong?
>>
>> Try using RPM:
>>
>> rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Net/IP.pm
> On the old machine:
> perl-Net-IP-1.25-2.fc6
>> and
>>
>> rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl
On 3/31/2014 8:10 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/31/2014 7:56 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
>> Can you verify to which packages thefiles belong?
>>
>> Try using RPM:
>>
>> rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Net/IP.pm
>>
>> and
>>
>> rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Crypt/DSA/KeyChain.pm
>
On 3/31/2014 7:56 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
> Can you verify to which packages thefiles belong?
>
> Try using RPM:
>
> rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Net/IP.pm
On the old machine:
perl-Net-IP-1.25-2.fc6
> and
>
> rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Crypt/DSA/KeyChain.pm
On the new mach
On 3/31/2014 7:56 PM, Tom Robinson wrote:
> Can you verify to which packages thefiles belong?
>
> Try using RPM:
>
> rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Net/IP.pm
>
> and
>
> rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Crypt/DSA/KeyChain.pm
for that matter, on both machines...
rpm -qa |gre
Can you verify to which packages thefiles belong?
Try using RPM:
rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Net/IP.pm
and
rpm -qf /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/Crypt/DSA/KeyChain.pm
Tom Robinson
IT Manager/System Administrator
MoTeC Pty Ltd
121 Merrindale Drive
Croydon South
3136 Victoria
I had to move a perl script from an old server to a new one. Both the
old and new servers are running "CentOS release 5.10 (Final)" and perl
v5.8.8. (But the problem I'm running into appears to be a package
management problem and not a Perl problem which is why I'm posting it to
a CentOS list.
21 matches
Mail list logo
