>rsync already defaults to ssh as transport but with
>$ rsync -e 'ssh -i keyfile'
>you can use rsync with a ssh key.
Yes, that was what I had been doing, but I wanted to avoid the
use of ssh completely, the connection is secured over a vpn, silly
to incur the overhead of encryption, twice.
An rsy
Joseph L. Casale schrieb:
>> Another feature of rsync modules that can be useful is that each module can
>> specify a user and group thus one can rsync user directories between
>> systems where the user names are the same but uid and gid may differ.
>
> I have been looking at this all morning. Is
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>Another feature of rsync modules that can be useful is that each module can
>>specify a user and group thus one can rsync user directories between
>>systems where the user names are the same but uid and gid may differ.
>
>I have been looking at this a
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> For the sake of being ready Saturday, what is the most secure (not using
> ssh) to
> authenticate in a script with an rsync daemon? Looks like it only does the
> user:pass
> pairs (not really good for script) or host based wrapper style security?
If the IPs are static th
>Put them here:
>http://rpms.linuxpowered.net/hpn-ssh/
>
>All the usual disclaimers apply, I have these running on a few
>dozen systems at different data centers running file transfers
>24/7 for the past year now that I think about it.
Nate,
That's great! I am not convinced yet that an rsync daemo
On 1/14/2010 12:27 PM, Bill Campbell wrote:
>
> Another feature of rsync modules that can be useful is that each module can
> specify a user and group thus one can rsync user directories between
> systems where the user names are the same but uid and gid may differ.
If you are running as root, rsy
nate wrote:
> Sure I can post them somewhere tomorrow probably, nothing
> fancy..
Put them here:
http://rpms.linuxpowered.net/hpn-ssh/
All the usual disclaimers apply, I have these running on a few
dozen systems at different data centers running file transfers
24/7 for the past year now that I t
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Another feature of rsync modules that can be useful is that each module can
>> specify a user and group thus one can rsync user directories between
>> systems where the user names are the same but uid and gid may differ.
>
> I have been looking at this all morning. Is th
>Another feature of rsync modules that can be useful is that each module can
>specify a user and group thus one can rsync user directories between
>systems where the user names are the same but uid and gid may differ.
I have been looking at this all morning. Is there any way to auth with keys
or s
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>>I didn't think unison was maintained any more - and I wouldn't expect
>>anything to beat rsync with the -z option on a slow link. I'd just use
>>the -P option and restart it when/if it fails. It wouldn't hurt to do
>>subsets first since they will
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> Am I missing something or does it only matter where you have a very high
>> bandwidth connection with some latency?
>
> I would imagine, but I have a server that takes rsync/ssh connections from
> multiple
> windows boxes everyday for differential updates to copies of
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Nate, care to share those packages:)
Sure I can post them somewhere tomorrow probably, nothing
fancy..
nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Am I missing something or does it only matter where you have a very high
> bandwidth connection with some latency?
That is why I use it, high bandwidth and some latency. I mentioned
it because it also has the none cipher which disables encryption,
might be more flexible then
>Am I missing something or does it only matter where you have a very high
>bandwidth connection with some latency?
I would imagine, but I have a server that takes rsync/ssh connections from
multiple
windows boxes everyday for differential updates to copies of databases and the
load on that machi
nate wrote:
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>
>> That looks impressive, I would love to use that for other needs as well.
>> How exactly do you go about installing this under CentOS? I can
>> pretty well assume that patching the stock rpm would not work:)
>
> For me I just built it from source and patc
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> That looks impressive, I would love to use that for other needs as well.
> How exactly do you go about installing this under CentOS? I can
> pretty well assume that patching the stock rpm would not work:)
For me I just built it from source and patched it, then
built cust
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>> I didn't think unison was maintained any more - and I wouldn't expect
>> anything to beat rsync with the -z option on a slow link. I'd just use
>> the -P option and restart it when/if it fails. It wouldn't hurt to do
>> subsets first since they will be quickly skippe
>Check out HPN-SSH, I use it extensively to transfer files over
>ssh, it provides a null cipher which you can use to disable
>encryption of data, while still maintaining encryption of
>authentication credentials.
>
>http://www.psc.edu/networking/projects/hpn-ssh/
>
>I transfer over a terrabyte of d
'
抄送：
主题： Re: [CentOS] unison versus rsync
>I didn't think unison was maintained any more - and I wouldn't expect
>anything to beat rsync with the -z option on a slow link. I'd just use
>the -P option and restart it when/if it fails. It wouldn't hurt to do
&g
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Looks like rf has 3.0.7, thanks for that tip. Frankly, I abhor the thought
> of even using rsync for this, it's over a vpn so there is absolutely no need
> for encryption but I don't know another tool that can transfer diffs only?
Check out HPN-SSH, I use it extensively
>I didn't think unison was maintained any more - and I wouldn't expect
>anything to beat rsync with the -z option on a slow link. I'd just use
>the -P option and restart it when/if it fails. It wouldn't hurt to do
>subsets first since they will be quickly skipped when you repeat from
>the roo
On 1/13/2010 5:54 PM, Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> Anyone got any actual comparisons between unison and rsync specifically
> related
> to the performance of synchronization of large data sets over slow links?
>
> I have a huge tree to start replication of Friday and know that if I sync the
> root
>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:54 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> Anyone got any actual comparisons between unison and rsync specifically
> related
> to the performance of synchronization of large data sets over slow links?
>
> I have a huge tree to start replication of Friday and know that if I sync th
Anyone got any actual comparisons between unison and rsync specifically related
to the performance of synchronization of large data sets over slow links?
I have a huge tree to start replication of Friday and know that if I sync the
root
paths it will take ages and with the lack of any overall sta
24 matches
Mail list logo
