Re: [CentOS] usb 3

2011-01-11 Thread Kwan Lowe
2011/1/11 Peter Kjellström : >> >> So no driver installed.. There's a link I found: > > "Unknown device" from lspci does not in the general case imply a lack of > driver. The only thing it says is that the pci-id database does not contain an > entry for the component. The command "update-pciids" w

Re: [CentOS] usb 3

2011-01-11 Thread Lisandro Grullon
That sounds great Jerry, the kernel upgrade worked for you. Just make sure you monitor that module since it is new and it might have glitches still. Keep that module up to date in your agenda. >>> Jerry Geis 1/11/2011 9:30 AM >>> I downloaded 2.6.34.8 - compiled and ran the new kernel making

Re: [CentOS] usb 3

2011-01-11 Thread Jerry Geis
I downloaded 2.6.34.8 - compiled and ran the new kernel making sure to enable XHCI and the device is now registered with lsusb. Jerry ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] usb 3

2011-01-11 Thread Peter Kjellström
On Monday, January 10, 2011 08:50:18 pm Kwan Lowe wrote: > On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: ... > [snip] > > > 01:00.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation Unknown device 0194 (rev 03) > > [snip] > > So no driver installed.. There's a link I found: "Unknown device" from lspci does

Re: [CentOS] usb 3

2011-01-10 Thread Lisandro Grullon
It would be great if you can post the output of this command to see the device ID /sbin/lspci - n | grep '01:00.0' >>> Jerry Geis 1/10/2011 3:12 PM >>> sure - I can wait for 6. Was hoping it would be here by now. Jerry Lisandro Grullon wrote: Likely support for 3.0 hasn't reach that kerne

Re: [CentOS] usb 3

2011-01-10 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: >> >> It is backwards compatible, but the chipset might not yet be >> supported.  What does lsdev show for the port? >> > I dont have lsdev - I do have lspci. Is this what you meant? [snip] > 01:00.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation Unknown device

Re: [CentOS] usb 3

2011-01-10 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: >> >> It is backwards compatible, but the chipset might not yet be >> supported.  What does lsdev show for the port? >> > I dont have lsdev - I do have lspci. Is this what you meant? :D Working on AIX at the moment so got my ls*'s mixed.. [snip

Re: [CentOS] usb 3

2011-01-10 Thread Lisandro Grullon
Jerry, See the /var/log/messages and see if you see the device being detect by the kernel when you plug in. tail /var/log/messages should hint you something.. >>> Jerry Geis 1/10/2011 2:36 PM >>> > > It is backwards compatible, but the chipset might not yet be > supported. What does lsdev show

Re: [CentOS] usb 3

2011-01-10 Thread Lisandro Grullon
I don't have a lsdev either, I hope he meant lspci | grep usb* or something along those lines...:-) >>> Jerry Geis 1/10/2011 2:36 PM >>> > > It is backwards compatible, but the chipset might not yet be > supported. What does lsdev show for the port? > I dont have lsdev - I do have lspci. Is

Re: [CentOS] usb 3

2011-01-10 Thread Jerry Geis
> > It is backwards compatible, but the chipset might not yet be > supported. What does lsdev show for the port? > I dont have lsdev - I do have lspci. Is this what you meant? 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation N10 Family DMI Bridge (rev 02) 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation N10/ICH

Re: [CentOS] usb 3

2011-01-10 Thread Kwan Lowe
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: > I am trying to plug a USB 2 device in a USB 3 slot. Nothing is being > detected > in "lsusb". Is there something special I need to do? I am running centos > 5.5 x86_64. > I thought 3.0 was backward compatible. Nothing special about my device > i

[CentOS] usb 3

2011-01-10 Thread Jerry Geis
I am trying to plug a USB 2 device in a USB 3 slot. Nothing is being detected in "lsusb". Is there something special I need to do? I am running centos 5.5 x86_64. I thought 3.0 was backward compatible. Nothing special about my device its an RS232 to USB device. It works in 2.0 slot. Thanks, Je