On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 12:38:22PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> Has anybody tried to use RPMForge package?
I don't see a conntrack-tools in rpmforge, nor in epel for that matter;
rpmforge has libnetfilter_conntrack but it's too low of a version to use
with the alt.ru conntract_tools pack
John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:32:08AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote:
>> yes indeed
>> i look through the sources and the path is hardcoded
>> it s really strange some packages for centos are built but obviously
>> don't work.
>
> I am by no means an expert on connection trac
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 11:32:08AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote:
> yes indeed
> i look through the sources and the path is hardcoded
> it s really strange some packages for centos are built but obviously
> don't work.
I am by no means an expert on connection tracking, but poking through
the sourc
On Wednesday, April 27, 2011 11:32:08 AM Eric Doutreleau wrote:
> yes indeed
> i look through the sources and the path is hardcoded
> it s really strange some packages for centos are built but obviously
> don't work.
You may want to take this up with the centalt people since it seems to be a
prob
yes indeed
i look through the sources and the path is hardcoded
it s really strange some packages for centos are built but obviously
don't work.
Le 27/04/2011 11:15, John R. Dennison a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:20:38AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote:
>>
>> Linux patan.int-evry.fr 2.6.18-
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:20:38AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote:
>
> Linux patan.int-evry.fr 2.6.18-238.5.1.el5 #1 SMP Fri Apr 1 18:42:32 EDT
> 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Thanks. I was curious if this might be a case of a kernel without the
necessary support such as an OpenVZ kernel. That d
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:03:01AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote:
> well i have already installed these packages.
> i was wondering what is creating these files on the /proc filesystems?
The conntrack* modules create those virtual files.
The conntrack_tools package is looking at the wrong director
thanks for your interest
here is the output
Linux patan.int-evry.fr 2.6.18-238.5.1.el5 #1 SMP Fri Apr 1 18:42:32 EDT
2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Le 27/04/2011 09:12, John R. Dennison a écrit :
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:03:01AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote:
>> well i have already installed
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:03:01AM +0200, Eric Doutreleau wrote:
> well i have already installed these packages.
> i was wondering what is creating these files on the /proc filesystems?
Out of curiousity what does "uname -a" return on that system? If you
could paste the _full_ output here it woul
well i have already installed these packages.
i was wondering what is creating these files on the /proc filesystems?
Le 26/04/2011 23:35, Ljubomir Ljubojevic a écrit :
> Eric Doutreleau wrote:
>> hi
>>
>> i would like to use conntrack_tools on my centos server.
>> i use the rpms from centalt
>> bu
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:35:29PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>
> Visit http://centos.alt.ru/pub/conntrack-tools/ and download appropriate
> rpm's, or download from RPMForge, but alt.ru version looks newer.
A quick note to the rpmforge-suggest mailing list is generally all it
takes to g
Eric Doutreleau wrote:
> hi
>
> i would like to use conntrack_tools on my centos server.
> i use the rpms from centalt
> but when i launch
>
> conntrack -C
> I got
> conntrack v0.9.13 (conntrack-tools): Can't open
> /proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_count
>
> Does someone already succeed in
hi
i would like to use conntrack_tools on my centos server.
i use the rpms from centalt
but when i launch
conntrack -C
I got
conntrack v0.9.13 (conntrack-tools): Can't open
/proc/sys/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_count
Does someone already succeed in using it?
Thanks in advance for any answer
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
