Re: [CentOS] using new sysconfig file

2008-07-13 Thread Ian Blackwell
Kai Schaetzl wrote: Thanks for the hint. It was the CRLF sequence from creating the file on a Windows machine. I haven't had a problem with this in a long time, bash scripts etc. work fine, no matter if LF or CRLF is used, but it seems to make a difference when including a file. Glad to h

Re: [CentOS] using new sysconfig file

2008-07-13 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Ian Blackwell wrote on Sun, 13 Jul 2008 08:34:51 +0930: > I got similar errors by corrupting my /etc/sysconfig/postgrey file, by > putting text into the delay value - i.e. I replaced 660 with 66O. I > suggest you recreate the file (from scratch) to make sure you haven't > got some odd binary d

Re: [CentOS] using new sysconfig file

2008-07-12 Thread Ian Blackwell
Kai Schaetzl wrote: I installed postgrey from rpmforge and wanted to use sysconfig to change options instead of overwriting the init file. However, I get a weird warning from postgrey. I'm not sure if this is a postgrey quirk or I use sysconfig the wrong way. /etc/sysconfig/postgrey: OPTIONS=

[CentOS] using new sysconfig file

2008-07-12 Thread Kai Schaetzl
I installed postgrey from rpmforge and wanted to use sysconfig to change options instead of overwriting the init file. However, I get a weird warning from postgrey. I'm not sure if this is a postgrey quirk or I use sysconfig the wrong way. /etc/sysconfig/postgrey: OPTIONS="--unix=/var/spool/pos