Le 10/01/2019 à 22:17, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit :
> I updated to CentOS 7.6 and something must have changed in the base
> OS setup that prevents vsftpd from allowing logins for accounts
> with /sbin/nologin as their shell.
Maybe this could be your solution. Here's the relevant lines from my
v
I think the pam_shells test is really a lazy test for daemons. There's
already a blacklist in /etc/vsftpd/user_list but it's incomplete. (It lacks
a LOT of common system services such as named, sshd, and dbus.) I suggest
replacing pam_shells with a test for UID < 1000:
authrequired
More digging (now that I have a better handle on how to ask the question)
reveals this bug against documentation and release notes for 7.6 to alert
updaters about this breaking change for vsftpd:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1647485
The last comment there, #15 by "Roy":
For a
--On Thursday, January 10, 2019 4:17 PM -0500 Stephen John Smoogen
wrote:
So I think this is a side effect of a long term argument of the security
nature of /sbin/nologin
https://serverfault.com/questions/328395/nologin-in-etc-shells-is-dangero
us-why
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/
On Thu, 10 Jan 2019 at 16:09, Kenneth Porter wrote:
> I updated to CentOS 7.6 and something must have changed in the base OS
> setup that prevents vsftpd from allowing logins for accounts with
> /sbin/nologin as their shell. I had to add that to /etc/shells so that
> such
> accounts could FTP ag
I updated to CentOS 7.6 and something must have changed in the base OS
setup that prevents vsftpd from allowing logins for accounts with
/sbin/nologin as their shell. I had to add that to /etc/shells so that such
accounts could FTP again. That file is in the setup package. Did it include
/sbin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 2018/05/23 8:24 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> I'm currently setting up a local FTP server, to receive disk images
> sent with G4L (Ghost4Linux).
>
> This server has been running Slackware Linux before, and the
> Vsftpd setup was relatively simple.
>
Le 23/05/2018 à 17:01, Pete Biggs a écrit :
> FTP uses two ports - in active mode the server uses 21 for command and
> 20 for data after the initial connection. In passive mode it uses 21
> for command and a high random port number for data. What is happening
> is that you are blocking the high por
Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 23/05/2018 à 16:58, m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit :
>> A suggestion: once you've got the firewall issue dealt with, set selinux
>> into permissive mode; *then* you can figure out what it's complaining
>> about, while at the same time, your system will be available. Once
>> you
Le 23/05/2018 à 16:58, m.r...@5-cent.us a écrit :
> A suggestion: once you've got the firewall issue dealt with, set selinux
> into permissive mode; *then* you can figure out what it's complaining
> about, while at the same time, your system will be available. Once you've
> fixed those issues, then
Le 23/05/2018 à 17:01, Pete Biggs a écrit :
> You could use active transfer and open port 20, or you could use
> passive, which is more "secure", and allow connections to high port
> numbers.
>
> Search for active vs passive ftp for more info.
That helped, thanks.
I added the following to /etc/v
Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently setting up a local FTP server, to receive disk images sent
> with G4L (Ghost4Linux).
>
> This server has been running Slackware Linux before, and the Vsftpd
> setup was relatively simple.
>
> With CentOS things seem to be slightly different, so I'm curr
Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Le 23/05/2018 à 16:36, Nux! a écrit :
>> Try "iptables -I INPUT" for your FTP rule.
>
> Doesn't work. I redirected all my errors to /var/log/messages, so here's
> what I get when I try to connect Filezilla to that server.
>
> May 23 16:48:58 c7-server kernel: +++ IPv4 packet
On 23 May 2018 at 11:05, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On 23 May 2018 at 10:24, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm currently setting up a local FTP server, to receive disk images sent
>> with G4L (Ghost4Linux).
>>
>> This server has been running Slackware Linux before, and the Vsftpd
>> setup
On 23 May 2018 at 10:24, Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently setting up a local FTP server, to receive disk images sent
> with G4L (Ghost4Linux).
>
> This server has been running Slackware Linux before, and the Vsftpd
> setup was relatively simple.
>
> With CentOS things seem to be sligh
> Doesn't work. I redirected all my errors to /var/log/messages, so here's
> what I get when I try to connect Filezilla to that server.
>
> May 23 16:48:58 c7-server kernel: +++ IPv4 packet rejected +++ IN=enp0s3
> OUT= MAC=08:00:27:00:00:03:d4:85:64:b2:b2:1b:08:00 SRC=192.168.2.2
> DST=192.168.2
Le 23/05/2018 à 16:36, Nux! a écrit :
> Try "iptables -I INPUT" for your FTP rule.
Doesn't work. I redirected all my errors to /var/log/messages, so here's
what I get when I try to connect Filezilla to that server.
May 23 16:48:58 c7-server kernel: +++ IPv4 packet rejected +++ IN=enp0s3
OUT= MAC=
Hi,
Try "iptables -I INPUT" for your FTP rule.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Kovacs"
> To: "CentOS mailing list"
> Sent: Wednesday, 23 May, 2018 15:24:45
> Subj
Hi,
I'm currently setting up a local FTP server, to receive disk images sent
with G4L (Ghost4Linux).
This server has been running Slackware Linux before, and the Vsftpd
setup was relatively simple.
With CentOS things seem to be slightly different, so I'm currently
trying to work things out. For
Hello,
Am Montag, 15. August 2016, 18:24:31 schrieb Eero Volotinen:
> You could try setting in vsftpd.conf:
> *use_sendfile=NO--*
Now I found the Problem it is a broken add on for firefox ??
With new installed Filezilla it is working ..
Don't use the the add on for firefox ...
Than
You could try setting in vsftpd.conf:
*use_sendfile=NO--*
*Eero*
2016-08-15 18:17 GMT+03:00 Günther J. :
> Hello,
>
> Am Montag, 15. August 2016, 18:11:56 schrieb Eero Volotinen:
> > Sounds like hardware failure (memory, disk) or network problem.
>
> On all tested Systems ;-) and I mean I fo
Hello,
Am Montag, 15. August 2016, 18:11:56 schrieb Eero Volotinen:
> Sounds like hardware failure (memory, disk) or network problem.
On all tested Systems ;-) and I mean I found 100 Messages in Goo... with
the same Problem ??
>
> 2016-08-15 16:20 GMT+03:00 Günther J. :
> > Hello,
> >
> >
Sounds like hardware failure (memory, disk) or network problem.
--
Eero
2016-08-15 16:20 GMT+03:00 Günther J. :
> Hello,
>
> CentOS 7.2
>
> have any a workaround for this Error ?
>
> vsftpd Error:426 failure Reading Network STream
>
> after transfer I have a broken file on the ftp Server
>
> I
Hello,
CentOS 7.2
have any a workaround for this Error ?
vsftpd Error:426 failure Reading Network STream
after transfer I have a broken file on the ftp Server
I mean I have found a newer Version 3.0.3 bot not for CentOS 7.2 but I cant
say is this Problem corrected in 3.0.3?
Any hint please ;
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:04 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
>
> > [root@srv-rhsoft:~]$ cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables-config
> > # Load additional iptables modules (nat helpers)
> > # Default: -none-
> > # Space separated list of nat helpers (e.g. 'ip_nat_ftp ip_nat_irc'),
> which
> > # are loaded after the
Hi Max,
It looks like a network issue instead of the software. Falling back to
PORT sounds like to ACTIVE mode from PASV mode. In PASV, you will be
connecting to a random port told by server with a random port from your
side. Do you have a firewall to block such traffic that the system will
se
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.04.2013 01:25, schrieb Max Pyziur:
>> On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 02.04.2013 01:12, schrieb Max Pyziur:
Beginning today, I started to receive the following when ftp'ing to my
CentOS 6 machine:
ncftp
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.04.2013 01:12, schrieb Max Pyziur:
>> Beginning today, I started to receive the following when ftp'ing to my
>> CentOS 6 machine:
>> ncftp /home/pyz2 > dir
>> connect failed: No route to host.
>> connect failed: No route to host.
>> connect fail
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013, lists-centos wrote:
>
>
> Original Message
>> Date: Monday, April 01, 2013 07:12:53 PM -0400
>> From: Max Pyziur
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Cc:
>> Subject: [CentOS] Vsftpd configuration problem
>>
>>
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.04.2013 01:12, schrieb Max Pyziur:
>> Beginning today, I started to receive the following when ftp'ing to my
>> CentOS 6 machine:
>> ncftp /home/pyz2 > dir
>> connect failed: No route to host.
>> connect failed: No route to host.
>> connect fail
Greetings,
Beginning today, I started to receive the following when ftp'ing to my
CentOS 6 machine:
ncftp /home/pyz2 > dir
connect failed: No route to host.
connect failed: No route to host.
connect failed: No route to host.
Falling back to PORT instead of PASV mode.
I can make a connection, bu
Il 03/01/2012 04:14, Nataraj ha scritto:
>>
>> Ok, the above works now. But while the setting was (by default) commented
>> out, the default wasn't /var/log/vsftpd.log but /var/log/xferlog which
>> was growing without limits (it was over 6 GB when I first time noticed the
>> problem) since logr
On 12/31/2011 02:48 AM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
> I have an up-to-date CentOS 6 with reasonable amount of ftp activity (a
> dozen of network cameras uploading images every second 24x7).
>
> The first issue was that the whole /var filesystem was about to get full,
> because of huge ftp daemon log.
>
>
I have an up-to-date CentOS 6 with reasonable amount of ftp activity (a
dozen of network cameras uploading images every second 24x7).
The first issue was that the whole /var filesystem was about to get full,
because of huge ftp daemon log.
vsftpd.conf says:
# You may override where the log file
You could do a chroot jail
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Chroot_Vsftpd_with_non-system_users
Or are you looking for something else?
-Chris
On Dec 17, 2011, at 7:22 PM, Al Sparks wrote:
> Is there a way to configure vsftpd to limit where you can chdir to?
> === Al
>
Is there a way to configure vsftpd to limit where you can chdir to?
=== Al
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Yes; it was an issue with Linux kernel 2.6.18-274.*.el5.centos.plus ; so I
switched back to Linux kernel 2.6.18-238.19.1.el5.centos.plus and it's working
now.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>> Any suggestion?
> possibly:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740399
>
I believe I've run into this problem/that bug as well.
As a workaround, I found that adding the following helped.
pasv_enable=YES
pasv_min_port=35000
pasv_max_port=36000
pasv_address=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx
If you are
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 04:37:37AM -0700, Fawzy Ibrhim wrote:
> I have Centos 5.7 64bit; I have installed vsftpd as standalone service and
> using it for two years now with no problem. Suddenly; only it works with
> active mode. The passive mode stops working and gives time out. Firewall is
> di
I have Centos 5.7 64bit; I have installed vsftpd as standalone service and
using it for two years now with no problem. Suddenly; only it works with active
mode. The passive mode stops working and gives time out. Firewall is disabled
and SELinux is set to permissive.
I ran tcpdump and I noticed
Dirk H. Schulz wrote on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 14:55:26 +0200:
> Since the source is no way to go
Try harder. I'm sure you'll get a response sooner or later. You could also
bug it at both the CentOS and RHEL bugzilla. You will need to give clear
reproduction instructions.
Kai
--
Get your web at Co
Kai,
Am 08.04.10 12:31, schrieb Kai Schaetzl:
> Dirk H. Schulz wrote on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:29:53 +0200:
>
> Can you please stop this? You are repeating your messages to the list with
> slightly changed subjects and content because you apprently don't get the
> answers you want. This is unfriendly
Dirk H. Schulz wrote on Thu, 08 Apr 2010 11:29:53 +0200:
Can you please stop this? You are repeating your messages to the list with
slightly changed subjects and content because you apprently don't get the
answers you want. This is unfriendly, please stop this! And spare lame
excuses.
Did you
I have configured my vsftpd instances to use virtual users and map them
to a system user. So all uploads should be written with owner and group
of this system user (let's call it ftpsystemuser).
But in the the last weeks/months it appears that uploads are written
twice, on instance as it should
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Dirk H. Schulz
wrote:
> I have configured my vsftpd with virtual users all of which are mapped
> to a system user for file system permissions (let's call him
> 'ftpsystemuser').
What is the vsftpd process running as? It is most likely root as it
needs to have perm
I have configured my vsftpd with virtual users all of which are mapped
to a system user for file system permissions (let's call him
'ftpsystemuser').
That means, if someone uploads files they are writting using owner and
group of the system user:
> -rw-r--r-- 1 ftpsystemuser ftpsystemuser 19968
Dirk H. Schulz wrote on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:41:55 +0100:
> makes me think that the same session with the same commands is
> "delivered" via 2 outgoing gateways, because it would be very
> complicated to have two ftp clients issue the same command in the same
> second. Know what I mean?
No, I d
Hi Kai,
Am 22.03.10 15:31, schrieb Kai Schaetzl:
> Dirk H. Schulz wrote on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:41:50 +0100:
>
>
>> What I am concerned about is the fact that the client sends out using
>> various gateways at once. Is there some configuration item in VSFTPD
>> which can prevent this and reject
Dirk H. Schulz wrote on Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:41:50 +0100:
> What I am concerned about is the fact that the client sends out using
> various gateways at once. Is there some configuration item in VSFTPD
> which can prevent this and reject packets from the additional ip addresses?
Note, this is not
Hi folks,
I have found the following in my logs:
Wed Mar 10 15:52:33 2010 [pid 15232] [uploaduser] OK MKDIR: Client
"195.200.70.*40*", "/04 LV gelieferte Daten 04_2010/04 LV
Seiten/Jungz?chter"
Wed Mar 10 15:52:33 2010 [pid 15231] [uploaduser] FAIL MKDIR: Client
"195.200.70.*41*", "/04 LV gel
John R Pierce wrote:
> Les Mikesell wrote:
>> I'd consider starting things at boot time to be as unrelated as you can
>> get. There's next to nothing in common between bsd and sysV oriented
>> systems (I think the ones you mention are mostly sysV-ish). And the ftp
>> config concepts go with th
Les Mikesell wrote:
> I'd consider starting things at boot time to be as unrelated as you can
> get. There's next to nothing in common between bsd and sysV oriented
> systems (I think the ones you mention are mostly sysV-ish). And the ftp
> config concepts go with the choice of the application
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> mark wrote:
>>> I got the book, and followed the directions. I, and others, have pointed
>>> you to dtuff, Viktor. You say you've not run a server in a while, and that
>>> "every OS is different." I'm assuming that means you ran Windows
> servers, and have
>>> not yet tak
> mark wrote:
>>
>> I got the book, and followed the directions. I, and others, have pointed
>> you to dtuff, Viktor. You say you've not run a server in a while, and that
>> "every OS is different." I'm assuming that means you ran Windows
servers, and have
>> not yet taken enough time to actually l
mark wrote:
>
> I got the book, and followed the directions. I, and others, have pointed you
> to
> stuff, Viktor. You say you've not run a server in a while, and that "every OS
> is different." I'm assuming that means you ran Windows servers, and have not
> yet taken enough time to actually l
Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Victor Subervi
> wrote:
>> Hi;
>> I've learned how to add a user and change the root dir of vsftpd (which of
>> course is undocumented). Now I need to learn how to make it so that a given
>> user can only access his/her folder (within the root
> They don't have to scroll down. Just a "thank you!" and goodbye.
"Thank You"
did you have to scroll down to read that?
More important than top vs bottom is EDITING THE QUOTED PORTION OF THE
MESSAGE.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http
>> Please stop being rude to the members of this list.
>
> I am not being rude in the least. Perhaps it is because email is so
> difficult to communicate attitudes, as we all know, that you are viewing
> things one way while I am saying them another. At any rate, please accept my
> apologies, altho
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Victor Subervi wrote:
> Ok. It's "the law". Now, what is the __logic__ behind not top post
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 7:01 AM, John R. Dennison wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 05:45:34AM -0500, Victor Subervi wrote:
> >
> > Now, forgive me, but that seems anal. What's the rationale there?
>
>While that may seem "anal" to you, it's one of the guidelines
>of this and other
On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 05:45:34AM -0500, Victor Subervi wrote:
>
> Now, forgive me, but that seems anal. What's the rationale there?
While that may seem "anal" to you, it's one of the guidelines
of this and other CentOS mailing lists as specified at:
http://www.centos.o
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:31 PM, Jim Perrin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Victor Subervi
> wrote:
> > Hi;
> > I've learned how to add a user and change the root dir of vsftpd (which
> of
> > course is undocumented). Now I need to learn how to make it so that a
> given
> > user can on
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 4:11 PM, Andrei F wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Take a look at the chroot_list_enable option. It enables you to specify
> per-user config.
>
> http://vsftpd.beasts.org/vsftpd_conf.html
Thank you.
V
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 3:36 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > I haven't been doing that for quite some time now, except when I'm
> > thanking you all for help, in which case I believe it's easier for all
> > concerned. Do you disagree?
>
> dont top post at all.
>
Now, forgive me, but that seems anal
- Original Message
> From: Jim Perrin
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Sent: Fri, November 13, 2009 3:31:42 PM
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] vsftpd question
>
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Victor Subervi wrote:
> > Hi;
> > I've learned how to add a use
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Victor Subervi wrote:
> Hi;
> I've learned how to add a user and change the root dir of vsftpd (which of
> course is undocumented). Now I need to learn how to make it so that a given
> user can only access his/her folder (within the root dir). Please advise.
Pleas
Hi,
Take a look at the chroot_list_enable option. It enables you to specify
per-user config.
http://vsftpd.beasts.org/vsftpd_conf.html
Cheers!
--
Andrei
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Victor Subervi wrote:
> Hi;
> I've learned how to add a user and change the root dir of vsftpd (which of
>
On 11/13/2009 08:29 PM, Victor Subervi wrote:
> Well, you all pointed me to some documentation that was hardly worthy of
> the name.
well, did you look at the vsftpd man page and also the config file that
is in the package ? I see everything that I need to do all these things
very clearly mentio
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 11/13/2009 07:16 PM, Victor Subervi wrote:
> > Hi;
> > I've learned how to add a user and change the root dir of vsftpd (which
> > of course is undocumented). Now I need to learn how to make it so that a
> > given user can only access his
On 11/13/2009 07:16 PM, Victor Subervi wrote:
> Hi;
> I've learned how to add a user and change the root dir of vsftpd (which
> of course is undocumented). Now I need to learn how to make it so that a
> given user can only access his/her folder (within the root dir). Please
not sure what docs you
Hi;
I've learned how to add a user and change the root dir of vsftpd (which of
course is undocumented). Now I need to learn how to make it so that a given
user can only access his/her folder (within the root dir). Please advise.
TIA,
Victor
___
CentOS mai
On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:17 PM, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
> Hi folks,
> I can't seem to log into my system via
> vsftpd. All other services using PAM are fine...Am I missing something simple?
> ftp> user
> (username) user
> 331 Please specify the password.
> Password:
> 530 Login incorrect.
>
>
> #
Hi folks,
I can't seem to log into my system via
vsftpd. All other services using PAM are fine...Am I missing something simple?
ftp> user
(username) user
331 Please specify the password.
Password:
530 Login incorrect.
# getenforce
Permissive
here is the event in /var/log/audit/audit.log:
type
From: Andrew Hull
> I recently received a complaint regarding the vsFTP server I'm running
> on a CentOS 4.x box. The complaint was that it is improperly responding
> to the LIST command - it is not returning hidden (period prefixed) files
> in the directory listing.
Hum... not sure if it is
Hi Folks,
I recently received a complaint regarding the vsFTP server I'm running
on a CentOS 4.x box. The complaint was that it is improperly responding
to the LIST command - it is not returning hidden (period prefixed) files
in the directory listing.
I investigated and found that vsFTPd would
On 11-Feb-09, at 8:50 AM, dnk wrote:
> Well as far as I have made it, it is possible to share a directory by
> using a "per user" config option. It is geting hte different
> permissions I am having to deal with. Part of me thinks this would be
> easier using a real system account so I can restric
>> USER 1
>> home = /home/ftproot/user1
>> has full read/write access
>>
>> USER 2
>> home = /home/ftproot/user2
>> has only read/download access
mount --bind /home/ftproot/user1 /home/ftproot/user2
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.
On 11-Feb-09, at 7:05 AM, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> dnk wrote:
> ...
>> I just need to have the option to have a "read only" account able to
>> access another users directory. There is no main directory that all
>> users work out of.
>
> Do
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dnk wrote:
...
> I just need to have the option to have a "read only" account able to
> access another users directory. There is no main directory that all
> users work out of.
Don't know how possible that could be. Remember that each user is in a
On 10-Feb-09, at 3:14 PM, dnk wrote:
>
> On 10-Feb-09, at 1:30 PM, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
>
>>> I may have found the answer to my own question. just trying it
>>> out.
>>
>> ;^)
>>
>> Let know your results.
>>
>> - --
>
> No good... the specific setup i found included with the VSFTPD
>
On 10-Feb-09, at 1:30 PM, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
>> I may have found the answer to my own question. just trying it
>> out.
>
> ;^)
>
> Let know your results.
>
> - --
No good... the specific setup i found included with the VSFTPD
examples won't "quite" do what I needed. and from my
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dnk wrote:
...
>> I used some of the info from the wiki, and from
>> http://linuxforfun.net/2008/04/05/vsftpd-virtual-users/
...
> I may have found the answer to my own question. just trying it out.
;^)
Let know your results.
- --
Alain Reguera
On 10-Feb-09, at 1:04 PM, dnk wrote:
>
> On 10-Feb-09, at 12:06 PM, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> dnk wrote:
>>> Good day all,
>>>
>>> I have followed the wiki article on setting up vsftpd on centos with
>>> virtual users.
>>
>> Do you re
On 10-Feb-09, at 12:06 PM, Alain Reguera Delgado wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> dnk wrote:
>> Good day all,
>>
>> I have followed the wiki article on setting up vsftpd on centos with
>> virtual users.
>
> Do you refer to:
> http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Chroot_Vsftpd
dnk wrote:
> Good day all,
>
> I have followed the wiki article on setting up vsftpd on centos with
> virtual users.
>
> I was wondering if anyone had an example of knowledge on how to add
> another "readonly" user. I don't want to enable anon access. The issue
> I have is that the tutorial (
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
dnk wrote:
> Good day all,
>
> I have followed the wiki article on setting up vsftpd on centos with
> virtual users.
Do you refer to:
http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Chroot_Vsftpd_with_non-system_users
?
> I was wondering if anyone had an example o
Good day all,
I have followed the wiki article on setting up vsftpd on centos with
virtual users.
I was wondering if anyone had an example of knowledge on how to add
another "readonly" user. I don't want to enable anon access. The issue
I have is that the tutorial (from the wiki) uses the s
Thanks, Filipe,
that has lead me to exactly what I was looking for.
Dirk
--On 9. Dezember 2008 17:18:30 -0500 Filipe Brandenburger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 15:02, Dirk H. Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> I have configured vsftpd with virtual users for w
Hi,
On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 15:02, Dirk H. Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have configured vsftpd with virtual users for webserver users (that
> means, a virtual users chrooted home is the document root of a virtual host
> in apache). That works fine so far - as long as SElinux ist not enforc
Hi folks,
I have configured vsftpd with virtual users for webserver users (that
means, a virtual users chrooted home is the document root of a virtual host
in apache). That works fine so far - as long as SElinux ist not enforcing.
I have tried to audit2allow out the problem, but did not succeed
> I'm using vsftpd as FTP server, and I'd like to chroot my FTP users
> to their home dir. How can I do it? i.e. "jailing"
> them in their home dir...
> at the moment I have the following issues the user when they login to
> ftp server they go to the main directory /var/ftp/
>
Here is what I
Hi ALL
I'm using vsftpd as FTP server, and I'd like to chroot my FTP users
to their home dir. How can I do it? i.e. "jailing" them in their home
dir...
at the moment I have the following issues the user when they login to
ftp server they go to the main directory /var/ftp/
/etc/passwd
...
sdc:x:5
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 20:04 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Timothy Selivanow
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> things like 'put' and 'get', etc.), the connection hangs. If you wait a
> >> bit it returns with a "425 Failed to e
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Timothy Selivanow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
things like 'put' and 'get', etc.), the connection hangs. If you wait a
bit it returns with a "425 Failed to establish connection". I've tried
Is the FTP client behind NAT? If it
On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Timothy Selivanow
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> things like 'put' and 'get', etc.), the connection hangs. If you wait a
> bit it returns with a "425 Failed to establish connection". I've tried
Is the FTP client behind NAT? If it is then active FTP won't work,
since
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 14:23 -0400, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 11:05 -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
> > Any ideas?
>
> Did you open both ftp and ftp-data ports?
Yes. On some of the hosts, my workstation is just explicitly allowed
through also (I've also tried turning
On Thu, 2008-06-05 at 11:05 -0700, Timothy Selivanow wrote:
> Any ideas?
Did you open both ftp and ftp-data ports?
--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__
I've encountered an odd error state that I haven't been able to resolve
yet. I have a customer that, for what ever reason, wants to use active
mode occasionally for FTP xfers. What they have noticed, is that after
you switch to active, and issue a command (they do 'ls', I've done other
things lik
It appears as I have VSFTPD allowing access authenticating to my LDAP server
correctly. I did this by configuring my server to authenticate to my LDAP
server from the GUI using System -> Administration -> Authentication. However
now when I look at /var/log/secure it says authentication failure.
On Thursday 28 June 2007 10:18, Feizhou wrote:
> Tony Molloy wrote:
> > On Thursday 28 June 2007 08:58, Feizhou wrote:
> >>> That's probably it. The SELinux problem strikes again.
> >>
> >> If you hate SELinux that much, just turn it off.
> >
> > I don't "hate" it. I just forget that it causes prob
1 - 100 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
