Hi there.
I'm trying to make a backup with deja dup.
The problem is that i connect to internet through my mobile. (I have an
unlimited plan)
When i set automatic backup it says that backup is delayed because of a
metered connection.
The problem is solved if i set with nmcli the GENERAL.METERED t
On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 14:27 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I've been pleased that the folks on this list have been solicited
> several times in the last six months for our opinions.
???
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.
Hi,
I just managed to get it work right now without elrepo.
At the end what you need to do is:
Download from Broadcom:
https://www.broadcom.com/docs/linux_sta/hybrid-v35_64-nodebug-pcoem-6_30_223_271.tar.gz
Following the wiki steps for 7.1:
https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Laptops/Wireless/Broadc
The kmod package (kmod-wl-6_30_223_271-2.el7.nux.x86_64.rpm) is
available from the nux-dextop repo. If you'd rather build it yourself,
please see http://elrepo.org/tiki/wl-kmod for details.
Akemi
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 2:06 AM, melkor.kp wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been using in the past the broadcom
Hi,
I've been using in the past the broadcom wifi card BCM4322 with Centos 7.1
one in the past, with kernel 3.10.0-229.7.2.el7 and driver 6_30_223_248 and
it worked well.
Now I updated Centos to 7.2 and the driver is not compiling any more under
kernel 3.10.0-327.3.1.el7. Neither driver 6_30_223_
On 12/11/2015 06:45 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
On the other hand, it would be relatively easy to determine the number
of CentOS users, or CentOS machines, in various categories. For some
reason both CentOS and Fedora seem to shy away from gathering this
kind of information, or indeed any informa
On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 11:45:05AM +, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> On the other hand, it would be relatively easy to determine
> the number of CentOS users, or CentOS machines, in various categories.
> For some reason both CentOS and Fedora seem to shy away from gathering
> this kind of information,
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> I think it's likely that, instead, you believe that you are
> representative of all of the people who do your job, and that features
> which you do not need are therefore not needed by others. That logic is
> quite normal, but completely wrong.
On the other hand, it would
On 12/10/2015 05:33 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 12/10/2015 1:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
As a lesser example, I just*adore* the new ethernet names - NOT. Breaks
scripts, makes it all more difficult, not to mention*so* much easier to
guess, when you've debugging a box and your organization h
On Dec 10, 2015, at 2:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Warren Young wrote:
>> So…you want veto power over Fedora?
>
> Beg pardon? Why are you caricaturing what I said?
I didn’t think it was a caricature at all. You clearly don’t want people to
“listen” to you, you want veto power.
If all yo
On 12/10/2015 07:21 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
If the bulk of the developers working on Fedora use laptops as their
platform then, inevitably, Fedora will become in essence a laptop
distribution and RHEL will follow.
Surely you're not suggesting that the code a developer writes is
dependent on
On 10 Dec 2015 23:25, "Leroy Tennison" wrote:
>
> The device I encountered it on had 10 NICS, at installation 6 of them got
the new naming convention and four of them got the eth convention. I guess
my question is "what's wrong with using the MAC address?" Yes, I know some
things don't have MAC
nal situation be the exception.
- Original Message -
From: "Jonathan Billings"
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 5:15:09 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2 kernel panic
on boot]
On Dec 10, 2015, at 6:05
that but then there's reality.
- Original Message -
From: "John R Pierce"
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 5:10:23 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2 kernel panic on
boot]
On 12/10/2015 3:05 PM, Leroy Tennison wrote:
> You think t
On Dec 10, 2015, at 6:05 PM, Leroy Tennison wrote:
> There is a freedesktop.org web page about why they did this - it has to do
> with mobile devices and plug-and-play networking. Take that page's statement
> about setting net.ifnames=0 cautiously, I found it was the exact opposite.
To be hon
On 12/10/2015 3:05 PM, Leroy Tennison wrote:
You think this is irritating, what about when you're trying to replicate the
network configuration to failover hardware...
IMHO, active/standby failover hardware should have exact identical
configurations down to firmware revisions, so I'm not sure
f the whole thing is
hardware vendors doing whatever they want and in some cases not playing b
y the rules.
- Original Message -
From: "John R Pierce"
To: centos@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, December 10, 2015 4:33:24 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2
On 12/10/2015 1:56 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
As a lesser example, I just*adore* the new ethernet names - NOT. Breaks
scripts, makes it all more difficult, not to mention*so* much easier to
guess, when you've debugging a box and your organization has hardware from
many OEMs. What was wrong wit
Warren Young wrote:
> On Dec 9, 2015, at 11:55 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
So, you're saying that end users need to go poke their noses into the
development process
>>>
>>> If you want to
On Dec 9, 2015, at 11:55 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
> Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>>> So, you're saying that end users need to go poke their noses into the
>>> development process
>>
>> If you want to go out of your way to r
On 12/10/2015 10:21 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
Since the import of what I was trying to convey has been lost, no
doubt due to my poor choice of words, I will restate the obvious: If
the bulk of the developers working on Fedora use laptops as their
platform then, inevitably, Fedora will become in
On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:21:56AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Since the import of what I was trying to convey has been lost, no
> doubt due to my poor choice of words, I will restate the obvious: If
> the bulk of the developers working on Fedora use laptops as their
> platform then, inevitably
On Wed, December 9, 2015 16:50, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2015 9:07 p.m., "Lamar Owen" wrote:
>>
>
>> No, it seems to me that a suitably motivated CentOS user needs to
>> scratch this itch; and, no, I am not volunteering, as I've
>> followed Fedora before..and just simply cannot give th
On 9 Dec 2015 9:07 p.m., "Lamar Owen" wrote:
>
> No, it seems to me that a suitably motivated CentOS user needs to scratch
this itch; and, no, I am not volunteering, as I've followed Fedora
before..and just simply cannot give the time to it at this point in
time in my life.
>
>
> So who wa
On 12/09/2015 11:45 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm sure it's *far* too much work for, say, the fedora development team to
put out once a quarter a notice to upstream, and maybe CentOS, Scientific
Linux, and whatever other main user groups to inform them of major
changes, and see the feedback
On 12/08/2015 07:46 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
I have been bitten by things done in Fedora that only have any use on
a laptop and that should never have been allowed into a server
distribution. But I cannot see how I would have been aware of them
until they manifested themselves on equipment unde
On 12/09/2015 05:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
hundreds of contributors introduces something t
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> >> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one
>> of
>> > Because of the context of this conversation. We can't have user
>> > feedback and involvement without user feedback and inv
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:15:56PM -0500, Steve Clark wrote:
> I think saying that you can have some say as to what goes into Fedora
> is being a little naive, look at systemd, many people complained
> about its inclusion but the powers to be heard none of it, and the
That's not a historically acc
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 01:05:15PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> >> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one of
> > Because of the context of this conversation. We can't have user
> > feedback and involvement without user feedback and involvement.
> So, you're saying
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:54:57AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Matthew Miller wrote:
>> > Working with your employer to fix the "will not allow Fedora into the
>> > premises" part seems like a good start.
>>
>> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just
On 12/09/2015 09:37 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
hund
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:54:57AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Matthew Miller wrote:
> > Working with your employer to fix the "will not allow Fedora into the
> > premises" part seems like a good start.
>
> Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one of my
Because of
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:45:55AM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I'm sure it's *far* too much work for, say, the fedora development team to
> put out once a quarter a notice to upstream, and maybe CentOS, Scientific
> Linux, and whatever other main user groups to inform them of major
> changes,
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 08:54:56AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> Working with your employer to fix the "will not allow Fedora into the
> premises" part seems like a good start.
Why? Fedora is a development, rapid change distro. I just bugged one of my
users yesterday that
Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
>> that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
>> developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
>> hundreds of contr
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 08:54:56AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
> that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
> developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
> hundreds of contributor
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:37:33AM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote:
> On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
> >So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
> >that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
> >developers and then point out whenever any
On 12/09/2015 08:54 AM, James B. Byrne wrote:
So, the implication of your suggestion, if I understand it aright, is
that I should audit all of the communication forums in use by Fedora
developers and then point out whenever any of the many dozens or
hundreds of contributors introduces something t
On Tue, December 8, 2015 11:05, Matthew Miller wrote:
>
>> I have been bitten by things done in Fedora that only have any use
>> on
>> a laptop and that should never have been allowed into a server
>> distribution. But I cannot see how I would have been aware of them
>> until they manifested the
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 10:46:58AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> > This is roughly true, although "downstream" RHEL makes its own
> > decisions about many things. If you (Mark, or anyone else) would like
> > to make this different in the future, getting involved with Fedora
> > Server is a good wa
On Mon, December 7, 2015 13:41, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:03:50AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:50:38PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> > For laptops, great. For anything else, not so much. For example,
>> > it's supposed to be an *ENTERPRISE
On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 02:23:21PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> 1. Ignoring the several hundred log, etc, emails I deal with at work
> every day, I'm currently on at least 5 mailing lists, including
> this one, each ranging in business from 10-30 emails/day.
I didn't say you have t
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:03:50AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:50:38PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> > For laptops, great. For anything else, not so much. For example,
>> > it's supposed to be an *ENTERPRISE* o/s... why does it
>> > automat
Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:03:50AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:50:38PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> > For laptops, great. For anything else, not so much. For example,
>> > it's supposed to be an *ENTERPRISE* o/s... why does it
>> > automat
On Fri, Dec 04, 2015 at 09:03:50AM -0500, James B. Byrne wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 03, 2015 at 02:50:38PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> > For laptops, great. For anything else, not so much. For example,
> > it's supposed to be an *ENTERPRISE* o/s... why does it
> > automatically, without ever asking,
Stephen Harris wrote:
> Create a simple S09 script (eg S09PROMISC) which basically just does
> "/sbin/ifconfig wlan0 promisc up"
>
> eg create this as /etc/init.d/PROMISC and then do "chkconfig PROMISC on"
>
>
> #!/bin/sh
>
> # PROMISC puts wlan0 in promisc mode
> #
> # chkconfig: 2345 09 91
>
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 10:04:56PM -0400, Phil Savoie wrote:
> Ross Walker wrote:
> > Don't know, but I think there is an option you can put in your interface
> > file to bring it up in promiscuous mode. Try that and see if NM can grab it
> > on boot.
> There used to be a PROMISC=yes setting I c
Ross Walker wrote:
> On Jul 29, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Phil Savoie wrote:
>
>>> Doesn't it look like the wpa connection is successful?
>>> It says: " Activation (wlan0/wireless) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure)
>>> successful. Connected to wireless network 'pszone'."
>>> Only stages 3/4 (the DHCP par
On Jul 29, 2010, at 5:57 PM, Phil Savoie wrote:
>> Doesn't it look like the wpa connection is successful?
>> It says: " Activation (wlan0/wireless) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure)
>> successful. Connected to wireless network 'pszone'."
>> Only stages 3/4 (the DHCP part) seems to fail...
>> The
> Doesn't it look like the wpa connection is successful?
> It says: " Activation (wlan0/wireless) Stage 2 of 5 (Device Configure)
> successful. Connected to wireless network 'pszone'."
> Only stages 3/4 (the DHCP part) seems to fail...
> The DHCPDISCOVER times out.
> Google says that some people
From: Dave Miller
> Larry Vaden writes:
>
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Phil Savoie
> rogers.com> wrote:
> > > Beginning DHCP transaction.
> >>TRIMMED<<
> > > Jul 27 19:32:23 smurf3 NetworkManager: Device 'wlan0' DHCP
> > > transaction took too long (>45s), stopping it.
> >
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:49 AM, Dave Miller wrote:
> I've also seen restating wpa_supplicant (as root, "service wpa_supplicant
> restart) fix things. Also, I've had better luck just getting the
> wpa_supplicant configuration right and not using NetworkManager (service
> NetworkManager stop).
Larry Vaden writes:
>
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Phil Savoie
rogers.com> wrote:
> > Beginning DHCP transaction.
>>TRIMMED<<
> > Jul 27 19:32:23 smurf3 NetworkManager: Device 'wlan0' DHCP
> > transaction took too long (>45s), stopping it.
> > Jul 27 19:32:23 smurf3 NetworkManager: w
John Doe wrote:
> Could it be IPv6?
>
> JD
>
I don't think so as I disabled IPV6 on install. But I do appreciate
your suggestion.
Thanks,
Phil
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
From: Phil Savoie
> I have the AR9285 wireless adaptor on an HP DV6-2128ca notebook. I can
> see it. it comes up in NetworkManager but never gets an IP. the router
> is a linksys using WPA/PSK security. Would/could someone please help me
> out trying to get this to work? Output of seve
Larry Vaden wrote:
> It would seem that one possibility is that the AP is not running a
> DHCP server.
>
> Another is that if the AP is running a DHCP server, it is restricting
> IP addresses to known clients.
>
> kind regards/ldv
Hi Larry,
Thanks for your reply. This wifi card is a known hos
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 6:33 PM, Phil Savoie wrote:
> Beginning DHCP transaction.
> Jul 27 19:31:38 smurf3 dhclient: Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client
> V3.0.5-RedHat
> Jul 27 19:31:38 smurf3 dhclient: Copyright 2004-2006 Internet Systems
> Consortium.
> Jul 27 19:31:38 smurf3 dhclient: All
Hello,
I have the AR9285 wireless adaptor on an HP DV6-2128ca notebook. I can
see it. it comes up in NetworkManager but never gets an IP. the router
is a linksys using WPA/PSK security. Would/could someone please help me
out trying to get this to work? Output of several commands follows:
d
Ned Slider wrote:
>
> I've not actually used the device, only plugged it in, so you'd need to
> configure it from here or just let NetworkManager handle the device.
>
I just fired the device up to test and it works fine out of the box with
NetworkManager connecting to a WPA encrypted WAP. Did
thanks I'll check that link.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert"
To: "CentOS mailing list"
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: [CentOS] wifi
>
>
> On 04/06/2010 01:56 PM, Davy Leon informed us:
>> Hi folks
>> I'm tr
Am Dienstag, 6. April 2010 20:56:42 schrieb Davy Leon:
> Hi folks
>
> I'm trying to use a Netgear WG111-2 USB-wifi adapter on a Centos 5.3 Box.
> Someone has done it? It seems not to be supported by the kernel.
I've tried it some month ago with no success :-(
On sidux (Kernel 2.6.32) it is supp
Davy Leon wrote:
> Hi folks
>
> I'm trying to use a Netgear WG111-2 USB-wifi adapter on a Centos 5.3 Box.
> Someone has done it? It seems not to be supported by the kernel.
>
> Thanks
>
> David
>
It should work. However, I'd strongly suggest updating from 5.3 as many
improvements to the wir
On 04/06/2010 01:56 PM, Davy Leon informed us:
> Hi folks
> I'm trying to use a Netgear WG111-2 USB-wifi adapter on a Centos 5.3
> Box. Someone has done it? It seems not to be supported by the kernel.
> Thanks
You might find something useful at
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=626499
_
Hi folks
I'm trying to use a Netgear WG111-2 USB-wifi adapter on a Centos 5.3 Box.
Someone has done it? It seems not to be supported by the kernel.
Thanks
David___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
hi there
thanks for that reply
i didnt know NetworkManager existed as a different service in centos!! all
this while i used the network service to start n stop the network services!!
i thought network and NetworkManager are one n the same.
thanks for the insight. i m writing this mail while connec
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 11:20 PM, Arvind P R wrote:
> hi all,
> this is my first hit on the mailing list. hope i m posting in the right
> place.
> well, i have a dell vostro 1510 laptop with broadcom wifi adapter. n it
> doesnt work! :(
> i installed the wifi drivers with ndiswrapper.
>
> iwconfig
On Sat, 2010-01-23 at 12:50 +0530, Arvind P R wrote:
> [r...@laptop ~]# cat /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf
> Failed to read or parse configuration '/etc/wpa_supplicant.conf'.
--
MELVILLE THEATRE ~ Melville Sask ~ http://www.melvilletheatre.com
__
hi all,
this is my first hit on the mailing list. hope i m posting in the right
place.
well, i have a dell vostro 1510 laptop with broadcom wifi adapter. n it
doesnt work! :(
i installed the wifi drivers with ndiswrapper.
iwconfig shows the following.
[r...@laptop ~]# iwconfig
lono wirele
After a year or so of trying to get wifi-cards of various brands and chipsets
to work, today it finally happened!
I got my 3com 3CRPAG175 to jump to it and connect to the department
WPA2 AP!
I wouldn't have done it without
your help. Thanks all!
One question though, should it really tak
hi ,
i just finished installing Cent OS 5.2 x64 on my thankpad
my hardware list shows the following
Atheros Communications Inc.
AR5212 802.11abg NIC
but when im trying to set up wireless network i cannot find the appropriate
wifi card.. when adding wifi connection
pls help
many thanks,
Sumit.
_
Hello.
I'm using my laptop (an Acer Aspire 3680, with built-in Atheros wifi). I
installed 5.2 on it, and it's working nicely. But, I have an issue with
the keyring. I should mention that this is my *first* experience with
keyrings.
When I set up the wifi, it stated basically that "nm-applet wan
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
>
>> Dag Wieers wrote:
>>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>
> Let us know whether we can improve this page to your benefit.
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Ned Slider wrote:
> Dag Wieers wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
Let us know whether we can improve this page to your benefit.
>>> And firmware for the iwl* drivers will become available from R
Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>>>
>>> Let us know whether we can improve this page to your benefit.
>> And firmware for the iwl* drivers will become available from RPMforge
>> as soon as Dag has a chance to push
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
>> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, MOKRANI Rachid wrote:
>>
>>> My OS : CentOS 5.2 x86_64 (kernel 2.6.18-92)
>>> The wifi card is : Intel PRO 5300
>>>
>>> Is somenone try it with success ?
>>> Please, any help will
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, MOKRANI Rachid wrote:
>> My OS : CentOS 5.2 x86_64 (kernel 2.6.18-92)
>> The wifi card is : Intel PRO 5300
>>
>> Is somenone try it with success ?
>> Please, any help will be appreciated.
>
> Please look at our fine CentOS
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, MOKRANI Rachid wrote:
> I'm trying to use my wireless connection on a HP 8530w laptop with no
> success.
>
> My OS : CentOS 5.2 x86_64 (kernel 2.6.18-92)
> The wifi card is : Intel PRO 5300
>
> Is somenone try it with success ?
> Please, any help will be appreciated.
Please
Hi,
I'm trying to use my wireless connection on a HP 8530w laptop with no
success.
My OS : CentOS 5.2 x86_64 (kernel 2.6.18-92)
The wifi card is : Intel PRO 5300
Is somenone try it with success ?
Please, any help will be appreciated.
Best regards.
__
Ce message (et
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of
>Toshaan Bharvani
>Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 1:42 AM
>To: centos@centos.org
>Subject: Re: [CentOS] wireless laptop configuration
>
>Sorin Srbu wrote:
>
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL P
80 matches
Mail list logo
