On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 02:17:43PM +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
> > I don't get this: /usr/share/magic/mime exists. it's not trying to
> > install or update httpd. where is it getting this dependency problem from?
>
> For now:
> http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3613
>
> Were
On May 12, 2009, at 9:13 AM, fred smith wrote:
More importantly, how do I resolve it?
http://www.google.com/search?q=centos+%2Fusr%2Fshare%2Fmagic%2Fmime
-steve
--
If this were played upon a stage now, I could condemn it as an
improbable fiction. - Fabian, Twelfth Night, III,v
http://fi
fred smith wrote:
> I don't get this: /usr/share/magic/mime exists. it's not trying to
> install or update httpd. where is it getting this dependency problem from?
For now:
http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=3613
Were working on a more permanent fix in the mean time.
- KB
___
Hi!
I've got three Centos-5.3 machines. one of' em ran the latest updates without
trouble.
the other two are giving me grief. both giving the same error:
# yum update
Loaded plugins: fastestmirror
Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile
On Wed, Jul 09, 2008 at 10:34:57PM -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:13 PM, fred smith
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Error: Missing Dependency: libdirectfb-0.9.so.25 is needed by package
> > mplayer
>
> This is an issue with rpmforge (Dag's) repository. It has been
On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 10:13 PM, fred smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Error: Missing Dependency: libdirectfb-0.9.so.25 is needed by package mplayer
This is an issue with rpmforge (Dag's) repository. It has been fixed
today, it should be propagated to mirrors by tomorrow.
See this post from Dag
You need to take this to the rpmforge mailing list - Dag just posted a
note there about this specific problem.
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hi:
Today when I do yum update I get this:
Resolving Dependencies
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: libdirectfb-0.9.so.25 for package: mplayer
---> Package directfb.i386 0:1.0.1-1.el5.rf set to be updated
---> Package amrnb.i386 0:7.0.0.2-1.el5.rf set to be updated
---> Pac
On Sat, Apr 05, 2008 at 01:45:59PM +0200, Rudi Ahlers wrote:
> but then Fred's machine shouldn't have tried to update openoffice?
Yes it would, because he installed _different_ RPMs of the same name from
a different source.
As the OP wrote:
>>>I recently removed (rpm -e) all the openoffice pack
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 7:45 AM, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but then Fred's machine shouldn't have tried to update openoffice?
Nope. This is the problem with using 'epoch' values in rpm.
He's installed version 2.whatever via rpm from openoffice.org. CentOS
contains openoffice packa
Jim Perrin wrote:
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Oh, I thought yum had a different cache / database of what is installed?
Yum keeps a cache and database of what's in the repositories, so it
can search more easily when you're looking to install
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Rudi Ahlers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, I thought yum had a different cache / database of what is installed?
Yum keeps a cache and database of what's in the repositories, so it
can search more easily when you're looking to install something from
the repositor
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Probably because "rpm -e {package name}" and "yum remove {package
name}" does different things.
I'd suggest run yum remove openoffice.org-core && yum clean all
They don't really do different things to the rpm database.
yum erase/remove will ALSO s
Rudi Ahlers wrote:
Probably because "rpm -e {package name}" and "yum remove {package name}"
does different things.
I'd suggest run yum remove openoffice.org-core && yum clean all
They don't really do different things to the rpm database.
yum erase/remove will ALSO solve for and remove de
fred smith wrote:
Hi!
I recently removed (rpm -e) all the openoffice packages (2.0.4) from
Centos and replaced them with Sun's packages for openoffice 2.4. Works
fine.
however, now whenever I run yum update I get this:
===
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:06 PM, fred smith
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> =
> Package Arch Version RepositorySize
> =
Hi!
I recently removed (rpm -e) all the openoffice packages (2.0.4) from
Centos and replaced them with Sun's packages for openoffice 2.4. Works
fine.
however, now whenever I run yum update I get this:
=
Package
17 matches
Mail list logo
