On 09/21/14 23:26, Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 20:52:08 +0530
dE wrote:
The announcement was from Mozilla, not CentOS. CentOS 7 has been
released, so there'll be no enhancement related updates which includes
FF 31.
This is the current firefox on Centos 7:
Name: firefox
Versio
On Sun, 21 Sep 2014 20:52:08 +0530
dE wrote:
> The announcement was from Mozilla, not CentOS. CentOS 7 has been
> released, so there'll be no enhancement related updates which includes
> FF 31.
This is the current firefox on Centos 7:
Name: firefox
Version : 31.1.0
Release : 6.
On 09/20/14 00:24, Joseph Godino wrote:
On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 13:10 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Joseph Godino wrote:
I think my software updates are not working. I know a Firefox update was
announced yesterday but when I try sudo yum update I get a message
sayin
On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 13:10 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Joseph Godino wrote:
> > I think my software updates are not working. I know a Firefox update was
> > announced yesterday but when I try sudo yum update I get a message
> > saying that no packages are marked
Yes, I'm running CentOS 7.
On Fri, 2014-09-19 at 11:08 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 9/19/2014 11:06 AM, Joseph Godino wrote:
> > I think my software updates are not working. I know a Firefox update was
> > announced yesterday but when I try sudo yum update I get a message
> > saying that no pa
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 1:06 PM, Joseph Godino wrote:
> I think my software updates are not working. I know a Firefox update was
> announced yesterday but when I try sudo yum update I get a message
> saying that no packages are marked for update. I tried sudo yum clean
> all but I still get the sa
On 9/19/2014 11:06 AM, Joseph Godino wrote:
I think my software updates are not working. I know a Firefox update was
announced yesterday but when I try sudo yum update I get a message
saying that no packages are marked for update. I tried sudo yum clean
all but I still get the same response.
Any
I think my software updates are not working. I know a Firefox update was
announced yesterday but when I try sudo yum update I get a message
saying that no packages are marked for update. I tried sudo yum clean
all but I still get the same response.
Any suggestions?
Joe
___
From: Lanny Marcus
> There are updates available, for the below multimedia packages (CentOS
> 5.5, 32 bit), but I'm getting missing dependency errors from yum
> update for these.
> ---> Package directfb.i386 0:1.2.10-1.el5.rf set to be updated
> ---> Package ffmpeg.i386 0:0.6.1-1.el5.rf set to
On 12/05/2010 08:43 AM Lanny Marcus wrote:
> There are updates available, for the below multimedia packages (CentOS
> 5.5, 32 bit), but I'm getting missing dependency errors from yum
> update for these.
>
> ---> Package directfb.i386 0:1.2.10-1.el5.rf set to be updated
> ---> Package ffmpeg.i386 0
Negative wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
>
> There are updates available, for the below multimedia packages (CentOS
> 5.5, 32 bit), but I'm getting missing dependency errors from yum
> update for these.
>
> ---> Package directfb.i386 0:1.2.10-1.el5.rf se
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 8:43 AM, Lanny Marcus wrote:
> There are updates available, for the below multimedia packages (CentOS
> 5.5, 32 bit), but I'm getting missing dependency errors from yum
> update for these.
>
> ---> Package directfb.i386 0:1.2.10-1.el5.rf set to be updated
> ---> Package ffmp
There are updates available, for the below multimedia packages (CentOS
5.5, 32 bit), but I'm getting missing dependency errors from yum
update for these.
---> Package directfb.i386 0:1.2.10-1.el5.rf set to be updated
---> Package ffmpeg.i386 0:0.6.1-1.el5.rf set to be updated
---> Package ffmpeg-l
Johnny Hughes wrote on Fri, 21 Dec 2007 09:11:47 -0600:
> Both will work ... the \ means do not expand the wildcard as a command
> in the shell
Ah, I see, thanks.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
__
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Johnny Hughes wrote on Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:00:27 -0600:
>
>> --exclude=openoffice\*
>
> shouldn't that be --exclude=openoffice* ?
> At least that syntax is what I use in the repo files.
>
> exclude=openoffice*
Both will work ... the \ means do not expand the wildcard as a
Johnny Hughes wrote on Thu, 20 Dec 2007 12:00:27 -0600:
> --exclude=openoffice\*
shouldn't that be --exclude=openoffice* ?
At least that syntax is what I use in the repo files.
exclude=openoffice*
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.co
Thanks, Johnny. I'm not a "pro" on this stuff.
Happy Holidays!!
Dick
Johnny Hughes wrote:
Dick Roth wrote:
As offered this will not work. It must have two (2) hyphens before the
word "exclude", thus:
yum update --exclude=openoffice
Alfred von Campe wrote:
Is there a way to still do t
Dick Roth wrote:
> As offered this will not work. It must have two (2) hyphens before the
> word "exclude", thus:
>
> yum update --exclude=openoffice
>
>
> Alfred von Campe wrote:
>>> Is there a way to still do the yum updates but not update the
>>> openoffice.
>>>
>>> Right now, I do it one a
As offered this will not work. It must have two (2) hyphens before the
word "exclude", thus:
yum update --exclude=openoffice
Dick
Alfred von Campe wrote:
Is there a way to still do the yum updates but not update the
openoffice.
Right now, I do it one at a time.
Yes, just do a "yum update
Is there a way to still do the yum updates but not update the
openoffice.
Right now, I do it one at a time.
Yes, just do a "yum update -exclude=openoffice".
Alfred
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/c
Hi,
Is there a way to still do the yum updates but not update the
openoffice.
Right now, I do it one at a time.
--
Thanks
http://www.911networks.com
When the network has to work
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailma
21 matches
Mail list logo
