On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:36 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 04/09/2012 07:31, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>>
>>
>> The first time (16:39:13.653674) client cannot sync to the server but
>> second time (16:39:43.145984) that was successful even if there is a
>> 'bad udp cksum'. BTW, is it normal? Tcpdump
On 04/09/2012 07:31, Artifex Maximus wrote:
The first time (16:39:13.653674) client cannot sync to the server but
second time (16:39:43.145984) that was successful even if there is a
'bad udp cksum'. BTW, is it normal? Tcpdump says there was traffic and
sync happened later so rule is OK I think.
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 03/09/2012 15:18, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
>>>
>>> The iptables rules
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 14:18 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> My server is able to synchronize with GPSNTP so rules
> are fine for that (because my output chain is ACCEPT per default).
And related traffic is allowed too, yes, I overlooked that.
Are you sure your windows clients have addresses in th
On 03/09/2012 15:18, Artifex Maximus wrote:
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
network access to your "proxy" ntp ser
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 11:15 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>> Any idea what is wrong?
>
> The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
> network access to your "proxy" ntp server. However, you do not specify
> any
On 03/09/2012 13:00, Philippe Naudin wrote:
Le lun. 03 sept. 2012 13:15:41 CEST, Leonard den Ottolander a écrit:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
Any idea what is wrong?
The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
network access to your "proxy" n
Le lun. 03 sept. 2012 13:15:41 CEST, Leonard den Ottolander a écrit:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> > Any idea what is wrong?
>
> The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
> network access to your "proxy" ntp server. However, you do not speci
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> Any idea what is wrong?
The iptables rules you specify only allow clients from your local
network access to your "proxy" ntp server. However, you do not specify
any rules for eth1 to allow that ntp server to synchronise with the
remote se
On 2.9.2012 18:22, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Markus Falb
> wrote:
>> On 2.9.2012 09:46, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
>>> CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on.
...
>>> The script for making f
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 2.9.2012 09:46, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
>> CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on. As I learned the NTP protocol uses
>> port 123 UDP. I have two NIC cards. One for i
On 2.9.2012 09:46, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
> CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on. As I learned the NTP protocol uses
> port 123 UDP. I have two NIC cards. One for internal network and one
> for access internet. Both cards
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Earl Ramirez wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
>> CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on. As I learned the NTP protocol uses
>> port 123 UDP. I have two NIC
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 07:46 +, Artifex Maximus wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I would like to setup an NTP server for my Windows network using
> CentOS 6.3 with firewall turned on. As I learned the NTP protocol uses
> port 123 UDP. I have two NIC cards. One for internal network and one
> for access inter
Seems like a well thought out and thorough explanation of how to do what
you're looking for.
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=579418
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
> Try setting it like this:
>
>fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 10
>server 127.127.1.0 prefer
>
>
Bowie
That did not work either.
jerry
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Jerry Geis wrote:
>> You can get an assortment of devices that receive time signals from
>> satellites to act as good authoritative time sources on your private
>> network if you are willing to spend some money. If you just want to
>> fake it, I think the trick is to lower the stratum number in
>
> You can get an assortment of devices that receive time signals from
> satellites to act as good authoritative time sources on your private
> network if you are willing to spend some money. If you just want to
> fake it, I think the trick is to lower the stratum number in the 'fudge'
> sett
On 7/1/2010 9:28 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
> I have a need to run a centos server CUT-off from any connected network.
> So the NTP server that is running on this very small network cannot
> connect to
> any other site to do what NTP does.
>
> however, I have devices on this small network that I wish to
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 10:51 -0400, Brunner, Brian T. wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> > [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis
> > Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:28 AM
> > To: CentOS ML
> > Subject: [CentOS] ntp server
> >
> > I
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Jerry Geis
> Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 10:28 AM
> To: CentOS ML
> Subject: [CentOS] ntp server
>
> I have a need to run a centos server CUT-off from any
> connected network.
>
Scott Ehrlich schrieb:
I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled. Windows
XP with SP2 cannot properly sync to it for time, but can communicate
with it via samba, ssh, and anything else.I also disabled the
Windows Firewall. The C5 system does not have any firewall enable
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 13:49 -0700, Jason Ross wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 11:43 -0800, James D. Parra wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Scott Ehrlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:37 AM
> > To: centos@centos.org
> > Subject: [CentOS] NTP server
>
Scott Ehrlich wrote:
> I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled. Windows
> XP with SP2 cannot properly sync to it for time, but can communicate
> with it via samba, ssh, and anything else.I also disabled the
> Windows Firewall. The C5 system does not have any firewall enab
XP command line:
net time \\servername returns what?
Perhaps the response will give a clue.
To set it:
net time \\servername /set /yes
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Scott Ehrlich
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:37 AM
To: cent
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 11:43 -0800, James D. Parra wrote:
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Ehrlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:37 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] NTP server
>
>
> I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabl
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ehrlich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 01, 2008 11:37 AM
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] NTP server
I have a Centos 5 64-bit server that has ntp service enabled. Windows XP
with SP2 cannot properly sync to it for time, but can co
27 matches
Mail list logo
