>>The critical components were the most frequent access/update patterns
>>versus the physical organization of the primary table(s) and their
>>_primary_ indexes, or hashes. Do DBMs still use those things?
Prmary Indexes have a lot more to do with I/O than most people think. You
really have to unde
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 16:32 -0500, David Ross wrote:
>
> There many factors which impact database i/o performance. You are comparing
> two probably dissimilar i/o paths. Configuration differences (disk,
> controller, connection, kernel parameters) may be part of the problem.
>
> Physical vs.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Behalf Of Mindaugas Riauba
> Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 3:45 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; CentOS@centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Painfully slow NetApp with databas
>
> We have long running problem with NetAp
Mindaugas Riauba wrote:
> NetApp support is claiming that such performance is normal. Somehow
> I do not believe that 2007 model should deliver such XXth century
> performance levels. :)
How many disks, what RPM are they running at, what I/O block size
is being used and what protocol (NFS/iSCSI
4 matches
Mail list logo
