Scott Silva wrote:
> Wasn't the samba issue something that was fairly critical, but just couldn't
> be backported?
Could be, I didn't catch the whole thread just a portion that
talked about compatibility issues with win2k3 and vista that
were too invasive to be back ported. Not sure about securit
Scott Silva wrote:
>
> on 2/13/2008 7:44 AM nate spake the following:
> > Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> >
> >> The agencies don't know what security backports vendor XYZ
> >> has implemented and frankly they don't care. All they have
> >> is a list of minimum version numbers that software must be
>
2 matches
Mail list logo
