Rainer Duffner wrote:
> I can't believe that nobody needs that in Linux-land.
> If you enlarge the LUN on the SAN for a Linux-volume, you end-up with
> a 2nd partition behind the first - you'd need to do some nasty,
> dangerous disklabel-manipulations to fix that.
> I end-up just adding another LU
Am 02.07.2008 um 00:17 schrieb John R Pierce:
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
This is an old way of doing it but it's worked fine for me over the
years.
I think the new way is documented here:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7321
i've had very good luck with
echo "- - -" > /sys/class/scsi_h
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
This is an old way of doing it but it's worked fine for me over the
years.
I think the new way is documented here:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7321
i've had very good luck with
echo "- - -" > /sys/class/scsi_host/host?/scan
replacing ? with the proper
>This is an old way of doing it but it's worked fine for me over the
>years.
I think the new way is documented here:
http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7321
I am guessing you could rescan it with a less obtrusive method...
jlc
___
CentOS mailing list
Scott Moseman wrote:
> I increased the SAN partition size for a given volume. Is there a way
> I can have fdisk recognize the new size without a reboot?
This is an old way of doing it but it's worked fine for me over the
years.
cat /proc/scsi/scsi and find the device that you resized
Make sure
5 matches
Mail list logo
