On Oct 11, 2011, at 4:02 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> Bear in mind that RHEL kernel is not stock kernel,
> there are number of back-ported patches in it. It is safer to use a
> package with applied RHEL specific patches (if necessary) done by people
> working with RHEL kernel regularly.
S
Marko Weber wrote:
> i am completely confused now.
> With elrepo u dont mean "epel.repo" or?
> How do i enable this "elrepo" in Centos?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=elrepo&l=1
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/ce
From: Marko Weber
> i am completely confused now.
> With elrepo u dont mean "epel.repo" or?
> How do i enable this "elrepo" in Centos?
Google 'elrepo' and it is the first answer...
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/m
Hi Ljubomir,
i am completely confused now.
With elrepo u dont mean "epel.repo" or?
How do i enable this "elrepo" in Centos?
marko
Am 12.10.2011 12:16, schrieb Ljubomir Ljubojevic:
> Vreme: 10/12/2011 07:10 AM, Karanbir Singh piše:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 10/11/2011 06:23 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrot
Am 11.10.2011 11:27, schrieb Marko Weber:
> Do i have to enable the epel-test repo to get itß
> But test sounds not stable for me and we switched to centos for
> stability.
>
> anyone here can help me or give me any hints on drbd on centos 6?
>
> Do i have to compile by hand?
No, use elrepo, do n
Vreme: 10/12/2011 07:10 AM, Karanbir Singh piše:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/11/2011 06:23 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
>> I do not have to read it (although I understood you the first time). My
>
> its strange then you feel compelled to comment on something without
> making an effort to even see what the ot
Hi,
On 10/11/2011 06:23 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> I do not have to read it (although I understood you the first time). My
its strange then you feel compelled to comment on something without
making an effort to even see what the other person is talking about.
> production server is not go
>I do not have to read it (although I understood you the first time). My
>production server
>is not going to be a ginipig for developers.
So if I understand you correctly:
If you build and rpm from the current stable release of a package provided to
you by the people
whom know this package bes
Vreme: 10/12/2011 12:09 AM, Joseph L. Casale piše:
>> I think he did, but he would like an package done by someone who knows
>> what he is doing. Bear in mind that RHEL kernel is not stock kernel,
>> there are number of back-ported patches in it. It is safer to use a
>> package with applied RHEL sp
>I think he did, but he would like an package done by someone who knows
>what he is doing. Bear in mind that RHEL kernel is not stock kernel,
>there are number of back-ported patches in it. It is safer to use a
>package with applied RHEL specific patches (if necessary) done by people
>working with
Vreme: 10/11/2011 07:47 PM, Joseph L. Casale piše:
>> Each thing you install by hand brake this.
>
> Did you actually read my post and the link?
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
>
I think
>Each thing you install by hand brake this.
Did you actually read my post and the link?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Thanks Joseph,
my thought ideas behind was, i like to maintenance systems via package
manager.
Each thing you install by hand brake this.
But it sounds okay for me.
Thank you.
marko (from rainy Hamburg)
Am 11.10.2011 12:22, schrieb Joseph L. Casale:
>>Do i have to compile by hand?
>
> Yeah,
>Do i have to compile by hand?
Yeah, but generate rpm's for final installation, its trivial.
http://www.drbd.org/users-guide-emb/s-build-rpm.html
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
14 matches
Mail list logo
