Re: [CentOS] File size diff on local disk vs NFS share - SOLVED

2012-05-05 Thread aurfalien
On May 3, 2012, at 4:01 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> On 05/03/2012 09:16 PM, aurfalien wrote: >>> On May 3, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Glenn Cooper wrote: >>> >>> I never really paid attention to this but a file on an NFS mount is >>> showing 64M in size, but when c

Re: [CentOS] File size diff on local disk vs NFS share

2012-05-03 Thread m . roth
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > On 05/03/2012 09:16 PM, aurfalien wrote: >> On May 3, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Glenn Cooper wrote: >> >> I never really paid attention to this but a file on an NFS mount is >> showing 64M in size, but when copying the file to a local drive, it >> shows 2.5MB in siz

Re: [CentOS] File size diff on local disk vs NFS share

2012-05-03 Thread Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 05/03/2012 09:16 PM, aurfalien wrote: > > On May 3, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Glenn Cooper wrote: > > I never really paid attention to this but a file on an NFS mount is > showing 64M in size, but when copying the file to a local drive, it > shows 2.5MB in size. > > My NFS server is

Re: [CentOS] File size diff on local disk vs NFS share

2012-05-03 Thread aurfalien
On May 3, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Glenn Cooper wrote: I never really paid attention to this but a file on an NFS mount is showing 64M in size, but when copying the file to a local drive, it shows 2.5MB in size. My NFS server is hardware Raided with a volume stripe size of 128K

Re: [CentOS] File size diff on local disk vs NFS share

2012-05-03 Thread aurfalien
On May 3, 2012, at 3:04 PM, Glenn Cooper wrote: I never really paid attention to this but a file on an NFS mount is showing 64M in size, but when copying the file to a local drive, it shows 2.5MB in size. My NFS server is hardware Raided with a volume stripe size of 128K