John R Pierce wrote:
> On 06/24/12 5:48 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> IMO the 64 bit scene is just as broken as it was 3
>> years ago when I had a 64 bit version intended for AMD (Phenom quad core
>> here) installed for about 2 hours.
>
> WHAT is broken about 'the 64 bit scene' ?!?I have 64 bit
On 06/24/12 5:48 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> IMO the 64 bit scene is just as broken as it was 3
> years ago when I had a 64 bit version intended for AMD (Phenom quad core
> here) installed for about 2 hours.
WHAT is broken about 'the 64 bit scene' ?!?I have 64 bit Opteron
systems happily runn
On 06/25/2012 05:10 PM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
> On 25/6/2012 3:48 πμ, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
>> IMO the 64 bit scene is just as broken as it was 3
>> years ago when I had a 64 bit version intended for AMD (Phenom quad core
>> here) installed for about 2 hours.
>
> We are using always 64-bit only i
On 25/6/2012 3:48 πμ, Gene Heskett wrote:
> IMO the 64 bit scene is just as broken as it was 3
> years ago when I had a 64 bit version intended for AMD (Phenom quad core
> here) installed for about 2 hours.
We are using always 64-bit only installations of CentOS 5 and 6
(including all packages)
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >>
>> > I see what someone meant when they said centos was a stripped mostly
>> > server distro.
I'd say it is sort of gnome-oriented, but there is plenty of desktop stuff now.
>> > With the
>> > same config files installed here on centos6,
On Sunday 24 June 2012 20:43:15 Leonard den Ottolander did opine:
> Hello Gene,
>
> On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 17:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > These are the packages it is
> > showing me that I _could_ install, and nearly every blessed one of
> > them has a dependency on python-2.4. Why yumex is
Hello Gene,
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 12:55 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> There are no surviving el5 packages on the system, including in the .repo
> files of yum.repos.d
No _surviving_ el5 packages. So you *did* have el5 repos enabled earlier
on? Perhaps yumex is caching that old configuration. Just
Hello Gene,
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 17:21 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> These are the packages it is
> showing me that I _could_ install, and nearly every blessed one of them has
> a dependency on python-2.4. Why yumex is even showing me el5 files is a
> puzzle I'm apparently not equipt to sort,
On Sunday 24 June 2012 17:31:40 Les Mikesell did opine:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > There are no surviving el5 packages on the system, including in the
> > .repo files of yum.repos.d
>
> Did you use yum to remove the packages?
>
Yes, except for the repo files in
On Sunday 24 June 2012 17:27:09 Tony Schreiner did opine:
> On 6/24/2012 12:55 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 June 2012 12:43:23 Leonard den Ottolander did opine:
> >> Hello Gene,
> >>
> >> On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 08:40 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >>> yum is still showing me 21 packages t
On Sunday 24 June 2012 16:48:31 Leonard den Ottolander did opine:
> Hello Gene,
>
> On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 12:55 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > There are no surviving el5 packages on the system, including in the
> > .repo files of yum.repos.d
> >
> > But if I fire up yumex, well over half the file
On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>>
> There are no surviving el5 packages on the system, including in the .repo
> files of yum.repos.d
Did you use yum to remove the packages?
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikes...@gmail.com
___
Cent
On 6/24/2012 12:55 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 24 June 2012 12:43:23 Leonard den Ottolander did opine:
>
>> Hello Gene,
>>
>> On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 08:40 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> yum is still showing me 21 packages to update, all from an el5 repo.\
>> You can figure out what repo that
Hello Gene,
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 12:55 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> There are no surviving el5 packages on the system, including in the .repo
> files of yum.repos.d
>
> But if I fire up yumex, well over half the files presented say they are el5
> coming from rpmfusion,
Those two statements se
On Sunday 24 June 2012 12:43:23 Leonard den Ottolander did opine:
> Hello Gene,
>
> On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 08:40 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > yum is still showing me 21 packages to update, all from an el5 repo.\
>
> You can figure out what repo that is by "rpm -qi"ing one of the packages
> that
Hello Gene,
On Sun, 2012-06-24 at 08:40 -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> yum is still showing me 21 packages to update, all from an el5 repo.\
You can figure out what repo that is by "rpm -qi"ing one of the packages
that is causing you trouble. Remove all offending packages, then remove
the repo rpm
On Sunday 24 June 2012 07:25:21 Veli-Pekka Kestilä did opine:
> On 24.6.2012 10:12, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 24 June 2012 03:06:14 Chris Geldenhuis did opine:
> >> On 06/24/2012 02:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> >>> Greets;
> >>>
> >>> This centos6.2 system seems to have python-2.6.6, but t
On 24.6.2012 10:12, Gene Heskett wrote:
> On Sunday 24 June 2012 03:06:14 Chris Geldenhuis did opine:
>
>> On 06/24/2012 02:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>>> Greets;
>>>
>>> This centos6.2 system seems to have python-2.6.6, but that is turning
>>> into a huge problem because I now have a backlog of ab
On Sunday 24 June 2012 03:06:14 Chris Geldenhuis did opine:
> On 06/24/2012 02:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > Greets;
> >
> > This centos6.2 system seems to have python-2.6.6, but that is turning
> > into a huge problem because I now have a backlog of about 40 packages
> > that will not upgrade be
On 06/24/2012 02:47 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greets;
>
> This centos6.2 system seems to have python-2.6.6, but that is turning into
> a huge problem because I now have a backlog of about 40 packages that will
> not upgrade because they all need python 2.4.
>
> That, and importing gpg keys doesn't
20 matches
Mail list logo
