On 22 April 2015 at 20:49, Mark LaPierre marklap...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/22/15 01:13, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
Dear All,
About a week ago; I posted a proposal over on the centos-devel mailing
list, the proposal is for a SIG 'CentOS hardening', there were a few of
the members of the
On 22 April 2015 at 20:49, Mark LaPierre marklap...@gmail.com wrote:
On 04/22/15 01:13, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
Dear All,
About a week ago; I posted a proposal over on the centos-devel mailing
list, the proposal is for a SIG 'CentOS hardening', there were a few of
the members of the
The most common way to get root on any box is through the web browser and
web browser plugins.
sandboxing firefox, acrobat reader, flash-plugin by default has gotta be a
priority. Was brought up before.
i use a ffSandbox.sh that launches FF in a sandbox, but no longer sandboxes
PDFs. Not
Am 23.04.2015 um 02:49 schrieb Mark LaPierre marklap...@gmail.com:
On 04/22/15 01:13, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
Dear All,
About a week ago; I posted a proposal over on the centos-devel mailing
list, the proposal is for a SIG 'CentOS hardening', there were a few of
the members of the community
On Wed, 2015-04-22 at 10:16 +0200, Tim wrote:
I think, this SIG would/should care about hardening CentOS itself as a system
not a complete environment (proxies, firewalls, etc.)
The examples of the opener show this.
Something else could be integrity checking possibly.
I imagine a
I am very interested.
One of my suggestions:
Firewall:
Network based firewall zone assignment (possibly disabling interface based
assignment)
Regards
Tim
Am 22. April 2015 07:13:52 MESZ, schrieb Earl A Ramirez
earlarami...@gmail.com:
Dear All,
About a week ago; I posted a proposal over on
apply also ideas from this document:
https://benchmarks.cisecurity.org/downloads/show-single/?file=rhel6.130
--
Eero
2015-04-22 9:30 GMT+03:00 Tim li...@kiuni.de:
I am very interested.
One of my suggestions:
Firewall:
Network based firewall zone assignment (possibly disabling interface
On 04/22/15 01:13, Earl A Ramirez wrote:
Dear All,
About a week ago; I posted a proposal over on the centos-devel mailing
list, the proposal is for a SIG 'CentOS hardening', there were a few of
the members of the community who are also interested in this. Therefore,
I am extending that
On 4/21/2015 11:34 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
apply also ideas from this document:
https://benchmarks.cisecurity.org/downloads/show-single/?file=rhel6.130
that should be your baseline. I suspect you'll find all the things you
mentioned are discussed in the CIS benchmarks.
--
john r
SELinux?
On 22 April 2015 at 09:11, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 4/21/2015 11:34 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
apply also ideas from this document:
https://benchmarks.cisecurity.org/downloads/show-single/?file=rhel6.130
that should be your baseline. I suspect you'll find all
Sounds like a bit basic stuff? How about hardening ciphers, two factor
authentication, snort, web application firewall and scap scanning?
Eero
22.4.2015 10.14 ap. Andrew Holway andrew.hol...@gmail.com kirjoitti:
SELinux?
On 22 April 2015 at 09:11, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
I think, this SIG would/should care about hardening CentOS itself as a system
not a complete environment (proxies, firewalls, etc.)
The examples of the opener show this.
Something else could be integrity checking possibly.
I imagine a tool/script that could apply hardening stuff.
Regards
Tim
12 matches
Mail list logo
