On 01/04/2016 06:26 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Preparing to build a small replacement server (initially built in 2005)
> and normally for the OS I would buy 2x500GB drives and deploy in a RAID
> 1 configuration.
> Now we have SSD drives available
> - does just a single SSD drive offer the same reliabi
On 1/4/2016 4:26 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
It seems most SSD are in laptop drive size, shape and interface - thus
not a good fit into a server motherboard unless I'm missing something.
- what devices are you using?
server motherboards don't care what size the drives are, that's a
function of you
On 2016-01-05, Rob Kampen wrote:
> - does just a single SSD drive offer the same reliability or is there
> advantage in deploying two in a Raid 1 config?
All else being equal, a RAID1 will be more reliable than a single drive,
whether it's magnetic or SSD.
> Also, what form factor / interface i
On 5 January 2016 at 09:26, Rob Kampen wrote:
> Preparing to build a small replacement server (initially built in 2005)
> and normally for the OS I would buy 2x500GB drives and deploy in a RAID 1
> configuration.
> Now we have SSD drives available
> - does just a single SSD drive offer the same r
On 02/02/2012 10:19 AM, Matt wrote:
> Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
> SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
> solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
> quickly in high I/O situations? Something like eac
On 2 February 2012 18:19, Matt wrote:
> Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
> SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
> solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
> quickly in high I/O situations? Something like
On 2/2/2012 5:19 PM, Peter A wrote:
> On 02/02/12 17:01, William Warren wrote:
>> On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote:
>>> If you're worried about io reliability, then buy a (way more expensive)
>>> SLC drive, rather than the consumer level MLC... We have some SLC drives
>>> here that from their man
On 02/02/12 17:01, William Warren wrote:
> On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote:
>> If you're worried about io reliability, then buy a (way more expensive)
>> SLC drive, rather than the consumer level MLC... We have some SLC drives
>> here that from their manufacturer have been rated at 3 or more yea
On 2/2/2012 2:15 PM, Peter A wrote:
> On 02/02/12 14:05, Mike wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, William Warren wrote:
>>
>>> On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It wo
On 02/02/12 14:05, Mike wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, William Warren wrote:
>
>> On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
>>> Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
>>> SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
>>> solve my I/O latency issues but I h
On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, William Warren wrote:
> On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
>> Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
>> SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
>> solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
>> quick
On 2/2/2012 1:19 PM, Matt wrote:
> Has anyone installed a high I/O application such as an email server on
> SSD drives? Was thinking about doing two SSD's in RAID1. It would
> solve my I/O latency issues but I have heard that SSD's wear out
> quickly in high I/O situations? Something like each m
12 matches
Mail list logo
