On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 17:32 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 16:46 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > > William L. Maltby wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > I wonder if anyone can duplicate the problem by creating a partition
> > > and having it mounted i
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 17:32 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 16:46 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > > William L. Maltby wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > I wonder if anyone can duplicate the problem by creating a partition
> > > and having it mounted i
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 17:32 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 16:46 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > > William L. Maltby wrote:
> > >
> >
> > > I wonder if anyone can duplicate the problem by creating a partition
> > > and having it mounted i
William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 16:46 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> > William L. Maltby wrote:
> >
>
> > I wonder if anyone can duplicate the problem by creating a partition
> > and having it mounted in fstab by volume label and see if it appears
> > twice.
>
> Not quite th
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 16:46 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
>
> I wonder if anyone can duplicate the problem by creating a partition
> and having it mounted in fstab by volume label and see if it appears
> twice.
Not quite the same, but I've a USB drive that I plugged
William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 13:15 -0700, MHR wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:59 PM, William L. Maltby
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > You mean regardless of if desktop is started up? In that case, it sounds
> > > like System->Preferences->Removable Drives and Media
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 13:15 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:59 PM, William L. Maltby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You mean regardless of if desktop is started up? In that case, it sounds
> > like System->Preferences->Removable Drives and Media settings need
> > changing to *no
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 13:15 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:59 PM, William L. Maltby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You mean regardless of if desktop is started up? In that case, it sounds
> > like System->Preferences->Removable Drives and Media settings need
> > changing to *no
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:59 PM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mean regardless of if desktop is started up? In that case, it sounds
> like System->Preferences->Removable Drives and Media settings need
> changing to *not* mount when hot-plugged.
>
At the risk of repeating m
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 12:50 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:43 PM, William L. Maltby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > If the "misc" is getting automounted, that would be a problem. But
> > wasn't the "noauto" option tried (I can't remember)?
> >
>
> No, I want it automounted.
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:43 PM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If the "misc" is getting automounted, that would be a problem. But
> wasn't the "noauto" option tried (I can't remember)?
>
No, I want it automounted. I just don't want it to show up twice on my desktop.
I suppo
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 15:25 -0400, Ross S. W. Walker wrote:
> William L. Maltby wrote:
> > On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 11:34 -0700, MHR wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:11 AM, William L. Maltby
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 16:03 -0700, MHR wrote:
> > > > >
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:25 PM, Ross S. W. Walker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I believe the problem is simple really.
>
> fstab has the device listed as LABEL=misc, and HAL reports it as /dev/sdX,
> the Gnome file manager sees these as 2 separate devices and presents them
> as such.
>
Act
William L. Maltby wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 11:34 -0700, MHR wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:11 AM, William L. Maltby
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 16:03 -0700, MHR wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Must be something like that - if I su and umount it, both icons
On Tue, 2008-04-29 at 11:34 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:11 AM, William L. Maltby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 16:03 -0700, MHR wrote:
> > >
> > > Must be something like that - if I su and umount it, both icons go
> > > away. Then I 'mount -a' and
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:11 AM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 16:03 -0700, MHR wrote:
> >
> > Must be something like that - if I su and umount it, both icons go
> > away. Then I 'mount -a' and only one comes back. But if I log out
> > and log back in,
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 16:03 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Ross S. W. Walker
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Boot and root should be ok, but misc is probably causing problems with file
> > managers querying fstab and hal.
> >
> > -Ross
> >
>
> Must be something like th
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 3:49 PM, Ross S. W. Walker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Boot and root should be ok, but misc is probably causing problems with file
> managers querying fstab and hal.
>
> -Ross
>
Must be something like that - if I su and umount it, both icons go
away. Then I 'mount -a'
Boot and root should be ok, but misc is probably causing problems with file
managers querying fstab and hal.
-Ross
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: CentOS mailing list
Sent: Mon Apr 28 18:30:00 2008
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Slightly OT: Extra ic
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:36 PM, Ross S. W. Walker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> tune2fs -L "" /dev/XXX
>
Thank you!
mhr
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Mon, 2008-04-28 at 13:52 -0700, MHR wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:36 PM, William L. Maltby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I see that you have solved. If for some reason you wish to keep both
> > definitions (there may be reasons), just add "noauto" (no quotes) to one
> > or both of
MHR wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:36 PM, William L. Maltby
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I see that you have solved. If for some reason you wish to keep both
> > definitions (there may be reasons), just add "noauto" (no quotes) to one
> > or both of the entries. This might be useful
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:36 PM, William L. Maltby
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I see that you have solved. If for some reason you wish to keep both
> definitions (there may be reasons), just add "noauto" (no quotes) to one
> or both of the entries. This might be useful when you want to mount
On Thu, 2008-04-24 at 11:06 -0700, MHR wrote:
> I'm running FC8 with Gnome 2.20.0 at work and I have this interesting
> situation.
>
> I have two disks on the system that are both configured to be mounted
> in /etc/fstab, but I'm seeing two things I believe are strange.
>
> One is that the secon
On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 11:11 AM, Ross S. W. Walker
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Slightly OT?
>
> Only way it could be more OT is if this were a Mac OS X or
> Windows forum... ;-)
>
You mean "slightly" isn't a synonym for "way?" :-)
> I suggest, forgoing disk labels...
>
I umounted the dr
MHR wrote:
>
> I'm running FC8 with Gnome 2.20.0 at work and I have this
> interesting situation.
>
> I have two disks on the system that are both configured to be mounted
> in /etc/fstab, but I'm seeing two things I believe are strange.
>
> One is that the second drive is not getting mounted a
26 matches
Mail list logo
