The server is finally up and running (kind of).
Now do I have to have X running on the server, or only installed.
That is can I run the server at init 3?
Scott Moseman wrote:
On 8/21/07, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FAQ, http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX
I looked on
I almost gave up myself when trying to set it up. its really worth it once
you get it working. for me it would authenticate but not connect. I forget
if the error message was the same as you are getting, sounds vaguely
similiar. turned out that I needed to add a line to /etc/hosts.allow
sshd: 127.0
ail.com>
X-Rcpt-To:
Jeremy Gray wrote on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 19:16:00 -0400:
> hmmm, I'd say probably not. what about tcp wrappers maybe?
I don't see how these could intervene here. This box is setup fresh and I didn't
set any firewall or other access restrictions yet. This is here in my local LAN
> ssh: connect to host xx port 22: Connection refused
>
> Looks like it is the client? Agreed?
hmmm, I'd say probably not. what about tcp wrappers maybe?
just to check the client, I deleted my 2.whatever windows client, downloaded
the latest windows client 3.0.0-73, and installed. it importe
Kai Schaetzl wrote on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 21:31:21 +0200:
> Now that I know that there is no service I'll see if I can connect to the
> nx user with SSH.
No problem to login with dsa key borrowed from nx user. I get the NXSERVER
prompt. Seems to be okay. Either the passthru authentication for the
Fabian Arrotin wrote on Thu, 23 Aug 2007 20:26:42 +0200:
> Was the following page not useful enough ? :
Obviously not ;-)
Can anyone confirm that the NX client for Windows version 3.0 should work?
The page says it's not known if 3.0 works and gives a link to an older
version. But that is Linux,
On Thu, 2007-08-23 at 13:03 -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > Scott Moseman wrote on Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:08:59 -0500:
> >
> >> I finally took the time to install and configure FreeNX.
> >
> > I tried as well, but it fails for me. There's no service for it and no
> > process wi
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Scott Moseman wrote on Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:08:59 -0500:
I finally took the time to install and configure FreeNX.
I tried as well, but it fails for me. There's no service for it and no
process with nx in the name running after I install nx and freenx. How am
I supposed to
Scott Moseman wrote on Wed, 22 Aug 2007 09:08:59 -0500:
> I finally took the time to install and configure FreeNX.
I tried as well, but it fails for me. There's no service for it and no
process with nx in the name running after I install nx and freenx. How am
I supposed to know that the server
Okay, thanks for the tip! Do the freenx rpm distributions for 64-bit
contain the 32-bit ones (seems like they should if they are required) or
do I have to install the 32-bit rpms separately? I'm sure I can figure
this one out, but if you happen to know, do tell!
Timothy Selivanow wrote:
> On Wed,
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 15:31 -0700, Liam Kirsher wrote:
> Well, that's concise. Thanks.
>
> Scott Moseman wrote:
> > On 8/22/07, Liam Kirsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> It looks like FreeNX only runs on 32-bit, won't run on 64-bit kernel.
> >> Is that correct? If so, is VNC the next b
Well, that's concise. Thanks.
Scott Moseman wrote:
> On 8/22/07, Liam Kirsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> It looks like FreeNX only runs on 32-bit, won't run on 64-bit kernel.
>> Is that correct? If so, is VNC the next best alternative?
>>
>>
>
> # uname -srmpio
> Linux 2.6.9-55.0.2.
On 8/22/07, Liam Kirsher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It looks like FreeNX only runs on 32-bit, won't run on 64-bit kernel.
> Is that correct? If so, is VNC the next best alternative?
>
# uname -srmpio
Linux 2.6.9-55.0.2.EL x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
# nxserver --status
NX> 100 NXSERVER -
It looks like FreeNX only runs on 32-bit, won't run on 64-bit kernel.
Is that correct? If so, is VNC the next best alternative?
Les Mikesell wrote:
> Robert Moskowitz wrote:
>
>>> I don't know about a minimum X install, but I've been very happy
>>> with freenx on centos 5, connecting as easily f
On 8/21/07, Craig White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > FAQ, http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX
> >
> > I looked on that page and I see that it integrates with SSH and can use
> > SSL natively. Does NX have any advantages beyond that over VNC?
>
> FreeNX - it's awesome
>
I finally took the ti
Scott Silva wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 11:42:34 -0700:
> compression
VNC has had compression since long. But it's weak on encryption, you
either have to use a VPN or SSH tunnel or a server and client that fit
together. I found that you don't need a VNC server on CentOS 5 to make use
of VNC. The
Alvin Chang wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:27:04 +0100:
> NX is event-based; VNC is session-based in real-time.
Can you explain that a bit? AFAIK VNC updates the screen when it finds
that portions of it have been updated, you can specify those portions a
bit (only detect changes in foreground win
Jeremy Gray wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 14:59:57 -0400:
> vnc clients seemed to vary a lot across platforms
Definitely, for Windows there are even several of them and they deliver
different
experience even on the same server. At the moment I find that UltraVNC provides
the best experience (after u
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I don't know about a minimum X install, but I've been very happy with
freenx on centos 5, connecting as easily from mac, PC, or linux. in my
lab (human brain imaging), we do remote graphics display all the time,
openoffice definitely works. I wanted to be able to work f
> Do you run the server in init 5? Or can it run in init 3? Trying to save
> memory on the server
>
I've only tried run level 5...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 21/08/07, Robert Moskowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you run the server in init 5? Or can it run in init 3?
>
> Trying to save memory on the server
>
> But wait, the client has even LESS memory :(
The NX server is not a daemon. The NX client will ssh into the server
as user nx with S
On 21/08/07, Kai Schaetzl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I looked on that page and I see that it integrates with SSH and can use
> SSL natively. Does NX have any advantages beyond that over VNC?
NX is event-based; VNC is session-based in real-time.
--
Alvin Chang Yu-Ming
___
Jeremy Gray wrote:
So here we are, in the modern times with GNOME (I chose that over KDE,
because), and Open Office, Thunderbird, and lots of other nice
graphical
apps.
I want to run the apps on an app server and access them for a thin
client. I am familiar with the K12
Kai,
I looked on that page and I see that it integrates with SSH and can use
> SSL natively. Does NX have any advantages beyond that over VNC?
I'd say nx wins on security, speed, and admin hassle-factor, at least based
on my limited experience and for my needs (small research lab in a
university
On Tue, 2007-08-21 at 20:31 +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Jeremy Gray wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:31:15 -0400:
>
> > FAQ, http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX
>
> I looked on that page and I see that it integrates with SSH and can use
> SSL natively. Does NX have any advantages beyond that over
Jeremy Gray wrote on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 09:31:15 -0400:
> FAQ, http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/FreeNX
I looked on that page and I see that it integrates with SSH and can use
SSL natively. Does NX have any advantages beyond that over VNC?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conacti
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
This is something that has been long overdue for me to set up, and how I
am looking it hard in the face.
Back in '94, I was doing REAL X-Terminals into UNIX systems. Watching
simple mouse meanderings eat up all available bandwidth, and forget it
if you resized a windo
> So here we are, in the modern times with GNOME (I chose that over KDE,
> because), and Open Office, Thunderbird, and lots of other nice graphical
> apps.
>
> I want to run the apps on an app server and access them for a thin
> client. I am familiar with the K12TLSP project, but right now I want
28 matches
Mail list logo
