On 6/28/2010 1:43 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>
> All RPM needs is for people to read and use the tools, and all
> this is done well presently
What's the right approach with RPM to have multiple versions of an
application installed simultaneously?
> "Those who don't understand UNIX are condemned to r
R P Herrold wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Jun 2010, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Y'know, I sorta like that idea - say, a script or program that you can
>> hand it info, such as if you've just built PHP the way I mentioned, and
>> have it be added to the rpmdb. That would also let you know if you did a
>> yum
On 6/28/2010 1:01 PM, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
>
>>> That's why I always thoroughly log all stuff installed by hand, along with
>>> extra configuration steps taken with RPM-installed items, and make sure the
>>> log's someplace where the next person can find it. In our case we maintain
>>> wikis for th
Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:58:14AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
>
>> > That's why I always thoroughly log all stuff installed by hand, along
>> > with extra configuration steps taken with RPM-installed items, and make
>> > sure the log's someplace where the next person can find
On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 11:58:14AM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> > That's why I always thoroughly log all stuff installed by hand, along with
> > extra configuration steps taken with RPM-installed items, and make sure the
> > log's someplace where the next person can find it. In our case we maintai
5 matches
Mail list logo
