Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS

2009-12-31 Thread JohnS
On Wed, 2009-12-30 at 20:32 -0500, fred smith wrote: > On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 04:13:04PM +, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > > > I tried everything in that post as well, and nothing worked for me. > > > Finally I found the process I laid out and it worked. > > > > > > The link to it is here which

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS

2009-12-30 Thread fred smith
On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 04:13:04PM +, Lars Hecking wrote: > > > I tried everything in that post as well, and nothing worked for me. > > Finally I found the process I laid out and it worked. > > > > The link to it is here which is an old ticket: > > > >

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS

2009-12-09 Thread JS
> -Original Message- > From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Lars Hecking > Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 7:24 AM > To: centos@centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS > > > I recently doownloaded and installed the latest RHEL5

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS

2009-12-09 Thread Max Hetrick
Lars Hecking wrote: > I've tested it and it works! Presumably, it might have worked in some of > my previous attempts, but I only now figured out that I need to manually > attach the device via device menu or USB icon. Not exactly plug and play, > but workable. > > The mount command itself is

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS

2009-12-09 Thread Lars Hecking
> I tried everything in that post as well, and nothing worked for me. > Finally I found the process I laid out and it worked. > > The link to it is here which is an old ticket: > > I've tested it and it works! Presumably, it might have worked in some of

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS

2009-12-08 Thread Max Hetrick
Lars Hecking wrote: > This is the bit that won't work. The mount options seem to have no effect: > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 8 12:08 001 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 8 12:08 002 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 8 12:08 003 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root root 0 Dec 8 12:08 004 > dr-xr-xr-x 2 root roo

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS

2009-12-08 Thread Max Hetrick
Jim Perrin wrote: >> I would imaging it's rather similar to this -> >> http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=20097 > > > Gah, lowsy spel chekc not pikcing up waht I mean. s/imaging/imagine/ > Ridiculous, I know...a computer should know what you're thinking and how to spell it. :)

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS

2009-12-08 Thread Lars Hecking
Jim Perrin writes: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Lars Hecking > wrote: > > I would imaging it's rather similar to this -> > http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=20097 Been there, tried that. VirtualBox actually complains if you mess with /sys/bus/usb/drivers: "You seem to h

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS

2009-12-08 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Lars Hecking > wrote: > > I would imaging it's rather similar to this -> > http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=20097 Gah, lowsy spel chekc not pikcing up waht I mean. s/imaging/imagine/ -- Durin

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS

2009-12-08 Thread Jim Perrin
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Lars Hecking wrote: I would imaging it's rather similar to this -> http://forums.virtualbox.org/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=20097 -- During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act. George Orwell _

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS

2009-12-08 Thread Lars Hecking
> Get your vboxusers group ID > # cat /etc/group | vboxusers > > Remount the USBFS with your vboxusers GID > # mount -t usbfs -o remount,devgid=GID,devmode=664 /proc/bus/usb > /proc/bus/usb This is the bit that won't work. The mount options seem to have no effect: # ll /proc/bus total 0 dr-x

Re: [CentOS] VirtualBox and CentOS

2009-12-08 Thread Max Hetrick
Lars Hecking wrote: > I recently doownloaded and installed the latest RHEL5 rpm from the VirtualBox > web site. While it generally works very well, I have been unable to get USB > access to work on the guest. > > This seems to be a very common problem. Many references to it turn up in a > web