Il 18/01/2014 23:58, Rob Kampen ha scritto:
> Question for the list:
> What level of integration do you have for your contact list?
> I need something that makes my workstation and laptop (both CentOS 6.5)
> using Thunderbird and IMAP mail servers (mostly CentOS postfix/dovecot +
> some gmail) and
Il 18/01/2014 18:45, Les Mikesell ha scritto:
>>> This is the realm for ClearOS, SME, or Nethserver which will have a
>>> reasonable mail system working out of the box instead of the months it
>>> will take someone to get the details right from scratch. But, no, it
>>> isn't likely to match Goog
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Gary Greene
> Sent: den 18 januari 2014 00:59
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] mail tools preferences?
>
> That said, I've had more
On 01/18/2014 10:18 PM, Always Learning wrote:
> We block all incoming emails from mail servers with host names
> resembling home Internet connections and also when the HELO/EHLO doesn't
> resolve to the host name. Consequently we don't get spam.
>
I effectively blocked most of spam also on my Pos
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>
> I now have an Android phone after an iPhone.
> I have always struggled with the Apple lock-in infrastructure - works real
> well if you're using Apple's OS on the PC.
That's not the case in the mail/contact/calendar realm. You can
configure
On 01/19/2014 02:00 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 05:10:34PM +1300, Rob Kampen wrote:
On 01/18/2014 11:29 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:13 PM, wrote:
We don't have enough arguments here
I see that thunderbird's deprecated for RHEL 7, and they r
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
> >>
>>> In parts of the world Yahoo mail is technically defective. Just does not
>>> work.
>>
>> Can you elaborate on that? Is it blocked or badly translated or
>> what?
>
> Yahoo is blocked here. Totally fed up with the constant outflow of spa
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 20:51 +, Ned Slider wrote:
> Yahoo is blocked here. Totally fed up with the constant outflow of spam
> from Yahoo servers. Abuse reports are largely ignored or met with
> disbelief that the spam could have possibly originated from their
> servers. So yes, "technically
On 18/01/14 17:45, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>>
>>> And yahoo works equally well as a free mail service.
>>
>> In parts of the world Yahoo mail is technically defective. Just does not
>> work.
>
> Can you elaborate on that? Is it blocked or ba
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>>
>> If you can't remember what you've sent, you can type
>> From: me
>> in the search box at the top and it will show what you've sent and
>> also the threads where you have participated. That's a feature I use
>> regularly because you can
On Sat, 18 Jan 2014 13:01:40 -0500
Scott Robbins wrote:
> I'm an old guy, who, though I have a smart phone, finds that
> typing on it is too much of a pain to answer an email properly.
Get a stylus. I have one and my wife made me a tiny belt-holder case to carry
it around. It's the real thin
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:39:14AM -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
> >>
> > Not to mention the privacy concerns--I remember when I first got a smart
> > phone, used my main gmail account for it, and suddenly saw that I had
> > contacts for anyone
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>> And yahoo works equally well as a free mail service.
>
> In parts of the world Yahoo mail is technically defective. Just does not
> work.
Can you elaborate on that? Is it blocked or badly translated or
what? I use an account there (
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 10:25 -0600, Les Mikesell wrote:
> I used the internet before Google existed.
Me too; in the good old days of Compuserve etc.; when AOL was in
competition with the Internet and 'AOL' meant something rude 'A... on
line'.
> And yahoo works equally well as a free mail service
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 7:00 AM, Scott Robbins wrote:
>>
> Not to mention the privacy concerns--I remember when I first got a smart
> phone, used my main gmail account for it, and suddenly saw that I had
> contacts for anyone that I'd ever sent mail to in my contacts list.
If I've sent something
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Always Learning wrote:
>
>> My daughter is just wrapping up her doctoral thesis and the university
>> she attends uses gmail for their mail system. The changes over the last
>> 12 months have caused her to miss incoming mail as gmail associates
>> incoming mail wit
On 01/17/2014 05:59 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 04:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> We don't have enough arguments here
>>
>> I see that thunderbird's deprecated for RHEL 7, and they recommend
>> evolution. I've certainly had some annoyances in the last couple-three
>> years with
On 18.01.2014 14:29, Ned Slider wrote:
>>
>
> I used to do that when FF/TB in the distro were quite outdated, but
> found the updating never worked for me, hence the convenience of
> maintained RPM packages. This was quite a few years ago, possibly
> around
> the time v3 was in the distro.
>
>
On 18/01/14 13:54, Nux! wrote:
> On 18.01.2014 13:19, Ned Slider wrote:
>> On 17/01/14 22:59, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 01/17/2014 04:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
We don't have enough arguments here
I see that thunderbird's deprecated for RHEL 7, and they recommend
evol
On 18.01.2014 13:19, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 17/01/14 22:59, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 01/17/2014 04:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> We don't have enough arguments here
>>>
>>> I see that thunderbird's deprecated for RHEL 7, and they recommend
>>> evolution. I've certainly had some annoyan
On 17/01/14 22:59, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 01/17/2014 04:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> We don't have enough arguments here
>>
>> I see that thunderbird's deprecated for RHEL 7, and they recommend
>> evolution. I've certainly had some annoyances in the last couple-three
>> years with t-bi
On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 05:10:34PM +1300, Rob Kampen wrote:
> On 01/18/2014 11:29 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:13 PM, wrote:
> >>We don't have enough arguments here
> >>
> >>I see that thunderbird's deprecated for RHEL 7, and they recommend
> >>evolution. I've certa
On Sat, 2014-01-18 at 17:10 +1300, Rob Kampen wrote:
> My daughter is just wrapping up her doctoral thesis and the university
> she attends uses gmail for their mail system. The changes over the last
> 12 months have caused her to miss incoming mail as gmail associates
> incoming mail with oth
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:10 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:
>>
>> Gmail's web interface is very low-maintenance...
>
> Have to take exception to this comment - the interface changes at the whim
> of google and I have to relearn - recently the changes have come with
> increasing frequency and major impact
On 01/17/2014 03:59 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> I will be using thunderbird from somewhere .. even if I have to build it
> myself
My suggestion is the Remi repo (http://rpms.famillecollet.com/):. He
provides the latest Firefox and Thunderbird among some other useful
stuff such php. I often have Fi
On 01/18/2014 11:29 AM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:13 PM, wrote:
We don't have enough arguments here
I see that thunderbird's deprecated for RHEL 7, and they recommend
evolution. I've certainly had some annoyances in the last couple-three
years with t-bird. So, what ar
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 17:32 -0800, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> My problem with Evolution is that it's not a mail tool, it's "a
> personal information management application" (their words). I don't
> want a calendar and I only barely want an address book; I do want
> something that operates without a
I find gmail very useful for some things, but it always feel a little
tainted by it. I really wish there was an open source webmail app that
could come closer to matching it.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 5:29 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:13 PM, wrote:
> > We don't have enoug
My problem with Evolution is that it's not a mail tool, it's "a
personal information management application" (their words). I don't
want a calendar and I only barely want an address book; I do want
something that operates without a server daemon (other than SMTP),
against a local-disk-only mail st
On Jan 17, 2014, at 2:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> We don't have enough arguments here
>
> I see that thunderbird's deprecated for RHEL 7, and they recommend
> evolution. I've certainly had some annoyances in the last couple-three
> years with t-bird. So, what are people's preferred mail
On 01/17/2014 04:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> We don't have enough arguments here
>
> I see that thunderbird's deprecated for RHEL 7, and they recommend
> evolution. I've certainly had some annoyances in the last couple-three
> years with t-bird. So, what are people's preferred mail tools,
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 17:21 -0500, Scott Robbins wrote:
> sylpheed will do most things--or claws-mail, which, IIRC, is a fork of
> sylpheed.
I find Claws is better than Sylpheed. Claws uses the same data files as
Sylpheed.
--
Paul.
England,
EU.
Our systems are exclusively Linux. No Mic
On 17.01.2014 22:13, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> We don't have enough arguments here
>
> I see that thunderbird's deprecated for RHEL 7, and they recommend
> evolution. I've certainly had some annoyances in the last couple-three
> years with t-bird. So, what are people's preferred mail tools, o
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 4:13 PM, wrote:
> We don't have enough arguments here
>
> I see that thunderbird's deprecated for RHEL 7, and they recommend
> evolution. I've certainly had some annoyances in the last couple-three
> years with t-bird. So, what are people's preferred mail tools, other
On Fri, 2014-01-17 at 17:13 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> So, what are people's preferred mail tools, other than
> t-bird (or maybe mutt or pine )?
Evolution 2.12.3 on C5.
--
Paul.
England,
EU.
Our systems are exclusively Linux. No Micro$oft Windoze here.
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 17:13:05 -0500
m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> I see that thunderbird's deprecated for RHEL 7, and they recommend
> evolution. I've certainly had some annoyances in the last couple-three
> years with t-bird. So, what are people's preferred mail tools, other than
> t-bird (or maybe mu
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 05:13:05PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> We don't have enough arguments here
>
> I see that thunderbird's deprecated for RHEL 7, and they recommend
> evolution. I've certainly had some annoyances in the last couple-three
> years with t-bird. So, what are people's pr
37 matches
Mail list logo
