Re: [CentOS] using Red Hat site for documentation

2014-07-31 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Wed, July 30, 2014 3:16 pm, Maxim Shpakov wrote: > 2014-07-30 23:03 GMT+03:00 Valeri Galtsev : >> So, please, teach me something: how do I build enterprise level server >> based CentOS 7 which I'll be able to run 1-2 years without reboot (I did >> apologize already for being ignorant person ;-)

Re: [CentOS] using Red Hat site for documentation

2014-07-30 Thread Keith Keller
On 2014-07-30, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > Eventually, you'll be able to use kpatch to avoid reboots for kernel > updates, (http://rhelblog.redhat.com/2014/02/26/kpatch/), This looks very exciting! > however I > tend to think that Uptime is overrated. uptime as a number of days is overrated, b

Re: [CentOS] using Red Hat site for documentation

2014-07-30 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 03:03:29PM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > 1. How often do you reboot your Linux servers? (every about 45 days there > is either kernel or glibc update. I remember somewhere about RedHat 5 - > RedHat 7 machines having uptime about 2 years) Eventually, you'll be able to use k

Re: [CentOS] using Red Hat site for documentation

2014-07-30 Thread Always Learning
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 23:13 +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote: > Valeri Galtsev: > > So, please, teach me something: how do I build enterprise level server > > based CentOS 7 which I'll be able to run 1-2 years without reboot (I did > > apologize already for being ignorant person ;-) Thank you for you

Re: [CentOS] using Red Hat site for documentation

2014-07-30 Thread Johnny Hughes
WTF does this email have to do with the subject On 07/30/2014 03:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Oh, boy. Now I have to rant on Linux and RedHat after being so happy with > them for much longer than a decade. OK, the first thing I have to admit: > I'm ignorant person. Please teach someth

Re: [CentOS] using Red Hat site for documentation

2014-07-30 Thread Maxim Shpakov
2014-07-30 23:03 GMT+03:00 Valeri Galtsev : > So, please, teach me something: how do I build enterprise level server > based CentOS 7 which I'll be able to run 1-2 years without reboot (I did > apologize already for being ignorant person ;-) > Oh, Valera, it seems you don't know about this: http:

Re: [CentOS] using Red Hat site for documentation

2014-07-30 Thread Les Mikesell
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 3:03 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > Oh, boy. Now I have to rant on Linux and RedHat after being so happy with > them for much longer than a decade. OK, the first thing I have to admit: > I'm ignorant person. Please teach something... > > Now questions: > > 1. How often do you

Re: [CentOS] using Red Hat site for documentation

2014-07-30 Thread Eero Volotinen
> So, please, teach me something: how do I build enterprise level server > based CentOS 7 which I'll be able to run 1-2 years without reboot (I did > apologize already for being ignorant person ;-) > > Well, just like other in systems, ignore all security patches? -- Eero

Re: [CentOS] using Red Hat site for documentation

2014-07-30 Thread Valeri Galtsev
Oh, boy. Now I have to rant on Linux and RedHat after being so happy with them for much longer than a decade. OK, the first thing I have to admit: I'm ignorant person. Please teach something... Now questions: 1. How often do you reboot your Linux servers? (every about 45 days there is either kern

Re: [CentOS] using Red Hat site for documentation

2014-07-30 Thread Always Learning
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 09:07 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > . And even though I'm using CentOS on all workstations in the > Department and on several older servers (introduction and philosophy of > RHEL 7 made it clear that new servers will definitely be not CentOS 7, - > FreeBSD most likely),

Re: [CentOS] using Red Hat site for documentation

2014-07-30 Thread Valeri Galtsev
This only can be said about the portion of their website that requires username and password to access. Everything else (such as Documentation) appears to be put out by them into public domain (that is you do not have to agree to any terms when you enter the documentation portion of their website),

Re: [CentOS] using Red Hat site for documentation

2014-07-30 Thread Jim Perrin
On 07/30/2014 08:38 AM, Adrian Buciuman wrote: -- > > The way I understand it, most RHEL documentation has a more permissive > license, like CC-BY-SA: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ > and can be redistributed under certain conditions. > However, the terms of use still apply t