Re: [CentOS] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

2008-02-12 Thread John Bowden
On Sunday 10 February 2008 21:35:37 Robert Spangler wrote: > Hi, > > I seem to not be able to connect to the folding site and receive new work. > Anyone else having this issue? Port 8080 is open as well as the other web > ports on the firewall. I can ping the host but get nothing when I open a >

Re: [CentOS] securing web applications (Wiki CMS installation)

2008-02-12 Thread Simon Jolle
2008/2/11, James A. Peltier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > This is a very broad question to ask, however, I will appeal to the basics. > > 1) Use HTTPS whenever possible to avoid any passwords crossing the wire > in clear text. > > 2) Ensure only the necessary modules are installed or enabled for your > CM

[CentOS] Making FORWARD_IPV4=YES permanent / DHCP multiple routers

2008-02-12 Thread Tim Alberts
First, I'd like to configure my system to forward ip, to act as a gateway for my network. I've always used a script during startup to do this: echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ${UPLINK} -j SNAT --to ${IP_NAT} This works fine, however I want this perman

Re: [CentOS] Making FORWARD_IPV4=YES permanent / DHCP multiple routers

2008-02-12 Thread Tim Alberts
Excellent and very responsive answers, thank you everyone. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] securing web applications (Wiki CMS installation)

2008-02-12 Thread Garrick Staples
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 11:11:21AM +0100, Simon Jolle alleged: > How to harden Apache and PHP (without using SELinux)? There is no "keep this stuff secure" configuration setting. The answer to your question is a large book and a skill set that takes years to learn. If you have a more specific qu

[CentOS] About DNS Client

2008-02-12 Thread neptuno
Hello everybody, look im testing the centos 5 server in a Virtual Machine (VMWare server) on windows XP, I have a problem when i try to access to internet using linux the dns server from my isp dosent work, but on windows it work sucessfully. I try everything, the gateway works fine I can ping t

[CentOS] change the GUI manager

2008-02-12 Thread Sobari Tanuwijaya
Hi, I installed CentOS using GNOME, but now I want to try it using KDE, how can I change it? Thanks in advance -- Tanu -- ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] About DNS Client

2008-02-12 Thread Sobari Tanuwijaya
What is the type of your ethernet connection? NAT? bridge? if NAT, is VMWare8 exists in your XP network connections and active? if bridge, what kind of connection do you use? using cable or wi fi? the bridge use the ethernet as a default. neptuno wrote: Hello everybody, look im testing the centos

RE: [CentOS] change the GUI manager

2008-02-12 Thread Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH / WQFK-894
Here's how to fix that... from root nano -w /etc/inittab go to where it says Default Runlevel change the 3 to a 5 control x, yes to overwrite and exit. I forgot what the kick command is that would initiate runlevel 5, but I am sure someone here will fire that little ditty out.. That will now b

Re: [CentOS] About DNS Client

2008-02-12 Thread nate
neptuno wrote: > Hello everybody, look im testing the centos 5 server in a Virtual Machine > (VMWare server) on windows XP, I have a problem when i try to access to > internet using linux the dns server from my isp dosent work, but on windows > it work sucessfully. > I try everything, the gateway w

RE: [CentOS] change the GUI manager

2008-02-12 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
Sobari Tanuwijaya wrote: > > actually, everytime I turn on the computer, the log in is the > text login > screen, then after I entered my username and password, I have to type > startx to start the xserver, that's the other thing I want to > know how > to make the login directly to GUI. To s

Re: [CentOS] pvmove speed

2008-02-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 19:57 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Are there any ways to improve/manage the speed of pvmove? Man doesn't show > any documented switches for priority scheduling. > Iostat shows the system way underutilized even though the lv whose pe's are > being migrated is continuously

Re: [CentOS] pvmove speed

2008-02-12 Thread William L. Maltby
Sorry 'bout that previous one. Wrong key combo hit! On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 19:57 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > Are there any ways to improve/manage the speed of pvmove? Not that I am aware of. Keep in mind that a *lot* of work is being done. You could "nice" it. "man nice". Since there is like

RE: [CentOS] change the GUI manager

2008-02-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>It seems KDE is not installed yet, how can I install the KDE? > >-- Tanu -- Yum groupinstall "KDE (K Desktop Environment)" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] change the GUI manager

2008-02-12 Thread Sobari Tanuwijaya
Which CD should I entered? -- Tanu -- Joseph L. Casale wrote: It seems KDE is not installed yet, how can I install the KDE? -- Tanu -- Yum groupinstall "KDE (K Desktop Environment)" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.or

Re: [CentOS] Re: system gets suspended automatically!

2008-02-12 Thread Chandra
2008/2/6 Ross S. W. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I don't think that is the "harmless" error message mentioned in the release > notes as that had to do with the "crash kernel". > > I saw this same error on a Dell AMD system. It seems the motherboard in > that system didn't do ACPI IRQ routing as t

[CentOS] Apache RPM's

2008-02-12 Thread Bob Boilard
Hello all, I love CentOS, but I am seriously regretting selecting Centos 4.4 for my production hosting servers. The current situation with CentOS 4.4 and being stuck at Apache 2.0.52 is a huge problem because of the new requirements for the Credit Card industry PCI scan. Apache 2.0.52 does not pa

RE: [CentOS] pvmove speed

2008-02-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>But I really have a hunch that it is just a lot of I/O wait time due to >either metadata maintenance and checkpointing and/or I/O failures, which >have very long timeouts before failure is recognized and *then* >alternate block assignment and mapping is done. One of the original arrays just needs

Re: [CentOS] Apache RPM's

2008-02-12 Thread Barry Brimer
I love CentOS, but I am seriously regretting selecting Centos 4.4 for my production hosting servers. The current situation with CentOS 4.4 and being stuck at Apache 2.0.52 is a huge problem because of the new requirements for the Credit Card industry PCI scan. Apache 2.0.52 does not pass PCI compl

RE: [CentOS] pvmove speed

2008-02-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 20:41 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >You could "nice" it. "man nice". Since there is likely to be a lot of > >I/O happening, it may not help much. > > Ok, here's a noob question :) - What process would I nice? If you run pvmove from the command line, "nice -20 pvmove" for

RE: [CentOS] pvmove speed

2008-02-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>You could "nice" it. "man nice". Since there is likely to be a lot of >I/O happening, it may not help much. Ok, here's a noob question :) - What process would I nice? >If the drives are on the same channel, or other devices on the channel >are also flooding the channel, that would be expected. D

Re: [CentOS] Apache RPM's

2008-02-12 Thread Johnny Hughes
Bob Boilard wrote: Hello all, I love CentOS, but I am seriously regretting selecting Centos 4.4 for my production hosting servers. The current situation with CentOS 4.4 and being stuck at Apache 2.0.52 is a huge problem because of the new requirements for the Credit Card industry PCI scan. Apa

Re: [CentOS] local root exploit

2008-02-12 Thread Matthew Miller
On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 10:56:28PM -0500, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > > Yes, but conceivable an application can make use of such a system > > > call since it is exploitable from user land and hence the concern. > > Well, the point is there's nothing wrong with the system call > > *inherently*. The

RE: [CentOS] VMWare Server Install Problem

2008-02-12 Thread Harry Sukumar
Dear All, Thank you all for sharing this information, I had to setup something very immediately and a friend of mine suggested VIRTUALBOX, so I went on installing virtualbox, to be frank its great free software. There was no hassle in Installation and pretty similar interface to VMWare Server. Doe

Re: Recall: [CentOS] VMWare Server Install Problem

2008-02-12 Thread Stephen Harris
On Wed, Feb 13, 2008 at 01:27:47PM +1000, Harry Sukumar wrote: > Harry Sukumar would like to recall the message, "[CentOS] VMWare Server > Install Problem". I'm sure he would, but the real world laughs at his wishes. Hint: that function only works for Exchange users. The rest of us... bwahahah

Re: [CentOS] pvmove speed

2008-02-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 19:57 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > > Iostat shows the system way underutilized even though the lv whose > pe's are being migrated is continuously being written (slowly) to. I finally thought about that last line. Makes since because meta-data tracking must be done as va

Recall: [CentOS] VMWare Server Install Problem

2008-02-12 Thread Harry Sukumar
Harry Sukumar would like to recall the message, "[CentOS] VMWare Server Install Problem". ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] pvmove speed

2008-02-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
Are there any ways to improve/manage the speed of pvmove? Man doesn't show any documented switches for priority scheduling. Iostat shows the system way underutilized even though the lv whose pe's are being migrated is continuously being written (slowly) to. Thanks! jlc __

Re: [CentOS] Strange performance issues under CentOS 5.1

2008-02-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 21:15 -0500, Alfred von Campe wrote: > I am still running CentOS 4.6 on our production systems, but I am > starting to plan the upgrade to CentOS 5.1. I have one test system > running 5.1 that is the exact same hardware configuration as my 4.6 > test system. One of our

Re: [CentOS] About DNS Client

2008-02-12 Thread Sobari Tanuwijaya
Just for a check, if you change it to NAT, and the eth0 in centOS set for aquiring the IP automatically, can it access the internet? -- Tanu -- neptuno wrote: My connection type is bridge for cable! - Original Message - From: "Sobari Tanuwijaya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS maili

Re: [CentOS] change the GUI manager

2008-02-12 Thread Sobari Tanuwijaya
I couldn't find any KDE option there, I just found: * Default * GNOME It seems KDE is not installed yet, how can I install the KDE? -- Tanu -- Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH / WQFK-894 wrote: at the login screen, go to session, change to KDE and then log in EFM -Original Message

Re: [CentOS] change the GUI manager

2008-02-12 Thread Sobari Tanuwijaya
Thanks. Now the CentOS login is in GUI ^_^ -- Tanu -- Ross S. W. Walker wrote: To start at runlevel 5 (graphic mode) on start, edit /etc/inittab with your favorite editor and near the top look for: # Default runlevel. The runlevels used by RHS are: # 0 - halt (Do NOT set initdefault to this)

RE: [CentOS] change the GUI manager

2008-02-12 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Which CD should I entered? Ouch, you used CD's? Heh... I haven't ever used a cd but I would assume if the media repo is enabled and you run the command I would hope it's smart enough to provide some direction. Actually, I also presume you would do this from inside gnome? If so, I think it wil

Re: [CentOS] change the GUI manager

2008-02-12 Thread Sobari Tanuwijaya
Thank you, I can get my GUI login now ^_^ --- Tanu --- Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH / WQFK-894 wrote: Here's how to fix that... from root nano -w /etc/inittab go to where it says Default Runlevel change the 3 to a 5 control x, yes to overwrite and exit. I forgot what the kick command

Re: [CentOS] change the GUI manager

2008-02-12 Thread Sobari Tanuwijaya
actually, everytime I turn on the computer, the log in is the text login screen, then after I entered my username and password, I have to type startx to start the xserver, that's the other thing I want to know how to make the login directly to GUI. -- Tanu -- Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH

Re: [CentOS] About DNS Client

2008-02-12 Thread neptuno
My connection type is bridge for cable! - Original Message - From: "Sobari Tanuwijaya" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CentOS mailing list" Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 08:53 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] About DNS Client What is the type of your ethernet connection? NAT? bridge? if NAT, is

[CentOS] Strange performance issues under CentOS 5.1

2008-02-12 Thread Alfred von Campe
I am still running CentOS 4.6 on our production systems, but I am starting to plan the upgrade to CentOS 5.1. I have one test system running 5.1 that is the exact same hardware configuration as my 4.6 test system. One of our builds runs about 6 times slower on the 5.1 system, even though

RE: [CentOS] change the GUI manager

2008-02-12 Thread Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH / WQFK-894
at the login screen, go to session, change to KDE and then log in EFM -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sobari Tanuwijaya Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 7:20 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] change the GUI manager Hi, I insta

Re: [CentOS] About DNS Client

2008-02-12 Thread neptuno
hello nat, thanks for response in /etc/resolv.conf search localdomain nameserver myispnameserverip nameserver myotherispnameserverip what do you think? - Original Message - From: "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 08:39 PM Subject: Re: [CentOS] About DNS

Re: [CentOS] change the GUI manager

2008-02-12 Thread Garrick Staples
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 08:48:22PM -0500, Evans F. Mitchell KD4EFM / AFA2TH / WQFK-894 alleged: > I forgot what the kick command is that would initiate runlevel 5, but > I am sure someone here will fire that little ditty out.. 'telinit 5' pgpHwAJrAtoRv.pgp Description: PGP signature __

[CentOS] Re: Question on failing hard drive part 2

2008-02-12 Thread Scott Silva
on 2/12/2008 2:00 PM Jimmy Bradley spake the following: OK, I've figured out which drive is bad. Before I go any further let me give a brief HD configuration explanation. The primary IDE has a 80gig(Master) HD, and an internal zip drive(Slave) connected to it. The two 200gig Hard Drives are

Re: [CentOS] Interim RPMs for vmsplice() issue

2008-02-12 Thread Erek Dyskant
> I would like to suggest if you could is that you also make 53.1.4 (maybe > put 53.1.4.cve20080600 as the release tag) patched available since a lot > of people have to run 53.1.4 because of broken nfs in 53.1.6 The full set of RPMs as suggested is at http://erek.blumenthals.com/blog now. I m

[CentOS] Question on failing hard drive part 2

2008-02-12 Thread Jimmy Bradley
OK, I've figured out which drive is bad. Before I go any further let me give a brief HD configuration explanation. The primary IDE has a 80gig(Master) HD, and an internal zip drive(Slave) connected to it. The two 200gig Hard Drives are connect to a PCI ATA controller card(Not a promise card),

[CentOS] Question on failing hard drives

2008-02-12 Thread Jimmy Bradley
In my Cent OS machine, I have 3 hard drives, an 80, and two 200gig hard drives. One of the drives is obviously starting to fail, but I'm not sure which one. Is there a command line command in Linux that will check the drive integrity on all the hard drives and tell me which one is going bad?

Re: [CentOS] change the GUI manager

2008-02-12 Thread Sobari Tanuwijaya
Yup, I download the ISOs and burn them. The connection in my place will not allowed me to install directly from internet :( OK, no problem I will try it. Thanks for the help. Joseph L. Casale wrote: Which CD should I entered? Ouch, you used CD's? Heh... I haven't ever used a cd but I wou

Re: [CentOS] Making FORWARD_IPV4=YES permanent / DHCP multiple routers

2008-02-12 Thread Shawn O'Shea
Tim Alberts wrote: First, I'd like to configure my system to forward ip, to act as a gateway for my network. I've always used a script during startup to do this: echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ${UPLINK} -j SNAT --to ${IP_NAT} For ip forwarding, edit

Re: [CentOS] Question on failing hard drives

2008-02-12 Thread nate
Jimmy Bradley wrote: > In my Cent OS machine, I have 3 hard drives, an 80, and two 200gig > hard drives. One of the drives is obviously starting to fail, but I'm > not sure which one. Is there a command line command in Linux that will > check the drive integrity on all the hard drives and tel

Re: [CentOS] Question on failing hard drives

2008-02-12 Thread Garrick Staples
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:26:10PM -0600, Jimmy Bradley alleged: > In my Cent OS machine, I have 3 hard drives, an 80, and two 200gig > hard drives. One of the drives is obviously starting to fail, but I'm > not sure which one. Is there a command line command in Linux that will > check the dr

Re: [CentOS] Apache RPM's

2008-02-12 Thread Johnny Hughes
Johnny Hughes wrote: Bob Boilard wrote: Hello all, I love CentOS, but I am seriously regretting selecting Centos 4.4 for my production hosting servers. The current situation with CentOS 4.4 and being stuck at Apache 2.0.52 is a huge problem because of the new requirements for the Credit Car

Re: [CentOS] Making FORWARD_IPV4=YES permanent / DHCP multiple routers

2008-02-12 Thread John R Pierce
Tim Alberts wrote: option routers 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2; so that if one is down, the network PC's can fail over to another? no, but you could setup the two 'routers' with heartbeat and stuff so that if the 'active' router goes down, the standby router takes over. __

Re: [CentOS] Making FORWARD_IPV4=YES permanent / DHCP multiple routers

2008-02-12 Thread David Mackintosh
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 10:26:54AM -0800, Tim Alberts wrote: > So how do I do this? edit /etc/sysctl.conf > option routers 10.0.0.1 10.0.0.2; Not as far as I know. -- /\oo/\ / /()\ \ David Mackintosh | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.xdroop.com pgpsnnQPVQsjZ.pgp Description: PGP s

Re: [CentOS] Making FORWARD_IPV4=YES permanent / DHCP multiple routers

2008-02-12 Thread nate
Tim Alberts wrote: > So how do I do this? easiest way is to put it in /etc/rc.d/rc.local . I'm sure that's not the "proper" way though. > so that if one is down, the network PC's can fail over to another? No PC will do that even if the DHCP server supported it. What you want is VRRP, so the bac

Re: [CentOS] Making FORWARD_IPV4=YES permanent / DHCP multiple routers

2008-02-12 Thread Greg Bailey
Tim Alberts wrote: First, I'd like to configure my system to forward ip, to act as a gateway for my network. I've always used a script during startup to do this: echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ${UPLINK} -j SNAT --to ${IP_NAT} This works fine, howeve

Re: [CentOS] Making FORWARD_IPV4=YES permanent / DHCP multiple routers

2008-02-12 Thread CM
Tim Alberts wrote: First, I'd like to configure my system to forward ip, to act as a gateway for my network. I've always used a script during startup to do this: echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o ${UPLINK} -j SNAT --to ${IP_NAT} This works fine, howeve

Re: [CentOS] local root exploit

2008-02-12 Thread Florin Andrei
jarmo wrote: Ofcource there's a way, get vanilla kernel 2.6.24.2 and use old config compile it and run. I've done it. I am running a 2.6.24.x kernel built like that on CentOS 5.1 x86_64, but be careful, some manual tweaking with "make menuconfig" is required, since there are too many differe

Re: [CentOS] Question on failing hard drives

2008-02-12 Thread Matt Hyclak
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 01:26:10PM -0600, Jimmy Bradley enlightened us: > In my Cent OS machine, I have 3 hard drives, an 80, and two 200gig > hard drives. One of the drives is obviously starting to fail, but I'm > not sure which one. Is there a command line command in Linux that will > check

Re: [CentOS] local root exploit

2008-02-12 Thread kfx
Akemi Yagi wrote: On Feb 12, 2008 8:40 AM, kfx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I did, for the record: http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ BEWARE that it will remove ALL the older kernels. No, that is simply not true. I have tested a couple of kernels from http://people.redhat.com/dzicku

Re: [CentOS] securing web applications (Wiki CMS installation)

2008-02-12 Thread kfx
mouss wrote: Johnny Hughes wrote: Simon Jolle wrote: 2008/2/11, James A. Peltier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This is a very broad question to ask, however, I will appeal to the basics. 1) Use HTTPS whenever possible to avoid any passwords crossing the wire in clear text. 2) Ensure only the neces

Re: [CentOS] local root exploit

2008-02-12 Thread Jim Perrin
On Feb 12, 2008 11:40 AM, kfx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I did, for the record: http://people.redhat.com/dzickus/el5/ > BEWARE that it will remove ALL the older kernels. It will do this if you install via rpm -Uvh, as the the upgrade implies the removal of older versions. -ivh will install it n

Re: [CentOS] local root exploit

2008-02-12 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Feb 11, 2008 10:52 AM, Scott McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 10:45 -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > > We have to wait and see, but my impression is that the nfs fix would > > not be in the updated kernel (I hope I am wrong). They are talking > > about getting it int

Re: [CentOS] local root exploit

2008-02-12 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Feb 12, 2008 8:40 AM, kfx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > However, we are not going to rush a non tested patch out the door. > > There are patches listed on the upstream bug, if you (figurative ... > > meaning anyone who wants to not wait) really want to integrate that > > into your own kernels

Re: [CentOS] local root exploit

2008-02-12 Thread kfx
Johnny Hughes wrote: kfx wrote: R P Herrold wrote: On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, kfx wrote: The official patch for debian is out since a couple of hours... Why does it take so long for RHEL ? Just a question, not a troll or something. 1. ask them it was a question, not a troll (bis). However, yo

Re: [CentOS] securing web applications (Wiki CMS installation)

2008-02-12 Thread mouss
Johnny Hughes wrote: Simon Jolle wrote: 2008/2/11, James A. Peltier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This is a very broad question to ask, however, I will appeal to the basics. 1) Use HTTPS whenever possible to avoid any passwords crossing the wire in clear text. 2) Ensure only the necessary modules are

Re: [CentOS] Samba problem after Up2date

2008-02-12 Thread Dago Pacheco
Johnny Hughes escribió: Dago Pacheco wrote: Johnny Hughes escribió: Dago Pacheco wrote: Ralph Angenendt escribió: Dago Pacheco wrote: Hi I have this CentOS 4.3 server that is used as a file, web and mail server just for LAN hosts. After an up2date procedure (in wich there was a lot of p

Re: [CentOS] Samba problem after Up2date

2008-02-12 Thread Johnny Hughes
Dago Pacheco wrote: Johnny Hughes escribió: Dago Pacheco wrote: Ralph Angenendt escribió: Dago Pacheco wrote: Hi I have this CentOS 4.3 server that is used as a file, web and mail server just for LAN hosts. After an up2date procedure (in wich there was a lot of package involved about

Re: [CentOS] Samba problem after Up2date

2008-02-12 Thread Dago Pacheco
Johnny Hughes escribió: Dago Pacheco wrote: Ralph Angenendt escribió: Dago Pacheco wrote: Hi I have this CentOS 4.3 server that is used as a file, web and mail server just for LAN hosts. After an up2date procedure (in wich there was a lot of package involved about 500) I started havi

Re: [CentOS] Apache RPM's

2008-02-12 Thread nate
Bob Boilard wrote: > Hello all, > > I love CentOS, but I am seriously regretting selecting Centos 4.4 for my > production hosting servers. The current situation with CentOS 4.4 and being > stuck at Apache 2.0.52 is a huge problem because of the new requirements for > the Credit Card industry PCI sc

Re: [CentOS] About NAT MAQUERADE

2008-02-12 Thread Nicolas Sahlqvist
http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/HOWTO/NAT-HOWTO-5.html On Feb 12, 2008 2:15 PM, Roilan Cardoso Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello everybody, í'm want to create a maquerade for my lan in the firewall > server I know i can use: > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o external-interface -

Re: [CentOS] Samba problem after Up2date

2008-02-12 Thread Johnny Hughes
Dago Pacheco wrote: Ralph Angenendt escribió: Dago Pacheco wrote: Hi I have this CentOS 4.3 server that is used as a file, web and mail server just for LAN hosts. After an up2date procedure (in wich there was a lot of package involved about 500) I started having problems with file

RE: [CentOS] pvmove speed

2008-02-12 Thread William L. Maltby
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 22:24 -0700, Joseph L. Casale wrote: > >But I really have a hunch that it is just a lot of I/O wait time due to > >either metadata maintenance and checkpointing and/or I/O failures, which > >have very long timeouts before failure is recognized and *then* > >alternate block ass

Re: [CentOS] About NAT MAQUERADE

2008-02-12 Thread Alain Spineux
On Feb 12, 2008 2:23 PM, Alain Spineux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Feb 12, 2008 2:15 PM, Roilan Cardoso Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hello everybody, í'm want to create a maquerade for my lan in the firewall > > server I know i can use: > > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o extern

[CentOS] About NAT MAQUERADE

2008-02-12 Thread Roilan Cardoso Sánchez
Hello everybody, í'm want to create a maquerade for my lan in the firewall server I know i can use: iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o external-interface -j MASQUERADE but I want to use this nat only for some IPs How can i restrict the nat maswuerade for an IP or Ip range? regards Roilan

Re: [CentOS] VMWare Server Install Problem

2008-02-12 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Feb 12, 2008 4:33 AM, Alfredo Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:43:38PM +1000, Harry Sukumar wrote: > > Good Day All, > > > > I have issues installing VMware Server on CentOS 5, its asking for the > > location of c header files, i have installed them all but i am stil

RE: [CentOS] VMWare Server Install Problem

2008-02-12 Thread Alex
The vmware site has appliances already for install many other also -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alfredo Perez Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2008 7:33 AM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: Re: [CentOS] VMWare Server Install Problem On Tue,

Re: [CentOS] VMWare Server Install Problem

2008-02-12 Thread Alfredo Perez
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:43:38PM +1000, Harry Sukumar wrote: > Good Day All, > > I have issues installing VMware Server on CentOS 5, its asking for the > location of c header files, i have installed them all but i am still > unable to install VMWare Server > > here is the output > > What is th

Re: [CentOS] VMWare Server Install Problem

2008-02-12 Thread Akemi Yagi
On Feb 11, 2008 9:43 PM, Harry Sukumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good Day All, > > I have issues installing VMware Server on CentOS 5, its asking for the > location of c header files, i have installed them all but i am still > unable to install VMWare Server > > here is the output > > What is th

Re: [CentOS] Samba problem after Up2date

2008-02-12 Thread Dago Pacheco
Ralph Angenendt escribió: Dago Pacheco wrote: Hi I have this CentOS 4.3 server that is used as a file, web and mail server just for LAN hosts. After an up2date procedure (in wich there was a lot of package involved about 500) I started having problems with file shareing

Re: [CentOS] Disk partitions and LVM limits

2008-02-12 Thread Peter Kjellstrom
On Friday 08 February 2008, Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > Peter Blajev wrote: ... > > group. Googling around it looks like there is 2TB limit and > > there should be > > some kernel parameters to tweak but I still can't get a clear answer. Only two (types) of 2T limit exists: 1) the driver or your st

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 36, Issue 6

2008-02-12 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can reac

Re: [CentOS] local root exploit

2008-02-12 Thread Johnny Hughes
kfx wrote: R P Herrold wrote: On Mon, 11 Feb 2008, kfx wrote: The official patch for debian is out since a couple of hours... Why does it take so long for RHEL ? Just a question, not a troll or something. 1. ask them it was a question, not a troll (bis). However, you are asking the wrong

Re: [CentOS] About NAT MAQUERADE

2008-02-12 Thread Alain Spineux
On Feb 12, 2008 2:15 PM, Roilan Cardoso Sánchez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello everybody, í'm want to create a maquerade for my lan in the firewall > server I know i can use: > iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o external-interface -j MASQUERADE just add --source option ( or --destination you

Re: [CentOS] securing web applications (Wiki CMS installation)

2008-02-12 Thread Johnny Hughes
Simon Jolle wrote: 2008/2/11, James A. Peltier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: This is a very broad question to ask, however, I will appeal to the basics. 1) Use HTTPS whenever possible to avoid any passwords crossing the wire in clear text. 2) Ensure only the necessary modules are installed or enabled f

Re: [CentOS] Samba problem after Up2date

2008-02-12 Thread Ralph Angenendt
Dago Pacheco wrote: [please edit your mails] > what is not recomended?. reinstall it or remvoe it from yum update? Go back to the old version. You will *NOT* reveive any support or security updates for that. > however... the procedure for reinstall it should be: > > yum remove samba > > the

Re: Octave support (was Re: [CentOS] When will CentOS 5 Plus be available?)

2008-02-12 Thread Primorec
On Mar 29, 2007 5:05 PM, Phil Schaffner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 21:23 +0100, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > > > all requests, on the bugs.centos.org/ trackers please! > > OK - here's another one: Support Octave in CentOSplus > > Octave has been dropped by upstream and there i