Hi Ralph,
2009/2/16 Ralph Angenendt :
> moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote:
>> Nop, I'm not subscribed to the spanish list, I didn't know that there is
>> one (but I'm not looking for a translation, I just want to publish the
>> document in spanish).
>
> Yeah, *I* am looking for a translation :)
I can volun
moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > It is a wiki, not a store for links to documents on another page.
>
> Wonderful, I can paste 20 pages there, do you prefer that?
Well, the way you're doing it at the moment is just fine :)
> >> Ohh shii...is not possible to keep a document wi
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote:
>> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>
Ohh shii...is not possible to keep a document with GFDL into a web site
with CC?
>>>
>>> I do not know offhand (but I don't think those two are compatible).
>>
>> Well Ralph, anyway, If I p
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote:
>> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>> > It is a wiki, not a store for links to documents on another page.
>>
>> Wonderful, I can paste 20 pages there, do you prefer that?
>
> Well, the way you're doing it at the moment is just fine :)
Ok, I'm putting there
Dag Wieers wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
[...]
>> If you put a *HEADER* on your page which states that *this* one document
>> is licensed under the GDFL and *NOT* under a CC license, I am *not*
>> happy with that, but I think it could work.
>>
>> Anyone having a problem wi
On 17/02/2009, moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote:
>
> Dag Wieers wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> >> If you put a *HEADER* on your page which states that *this* one document
> >> is licensed under the GDFL and *NOT* under a CC license, I am *not*
> >> happy with that, b
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote:
> Dag Wieers wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>> If you put a *HEADER* on your page which states that *this* one document
>>> is licensed under the GDFL and *NOT* under a CC license, I am *not*
>>> happy with that, b
Hi,
The other day I was looking for spanish version of CentOS Wiki, and
currently there this link at the bottom main page:
This wiki in Spanish.
And in the spanish main page http://wiki.centos.org/es
we have this link at the bottom
Esta wiki en otros idiomas: en | bn_IN | cs | de | fr | it | j
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:05, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:44, Alain Terriault
>> wrote:
>>> I am runing x86_64 versions of "kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5.centos.plus" (
>>> i need XFS)
>>
>> You no longer need C
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:05, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:44, Alain Terriault
>>> wrote:
I am runing x86_64 versions of "kernel-2.6.1
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Filipe Brandenburger
>>> And even this info is becoming obsolete. The current kmod-xfs package
>>> (in CentOS-5) is kABI-tracking, that is, it is independent of the
>>> kernel version.
>> I suggest creating a
The subject line for this "conversation / thread" reads:
"Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?"
The contents, however, relates to XFS & the CentOSPlus kernel.
Filipe, please take care with what you do. :-)
Alan.
___
CentOS-docs mail
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:33, Alan Bartlett wrote:
> The subject line for this "conversation / thread" reads:
> "Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?"
> The contents, however, relates to XFS & the CentOSPlus kernel.
> Filipe, please take care with what you do. :-)
Very sorry a
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 9:26 AM, Filipe Brandenburger
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:33, Alan Bartlett wrote:
>> The subject line for this "conversation / thread" reads:
>> "Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?"
>> The contents, however, relates to XFS & the CentOSPlus ker
Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Filipe Brandenburger
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:05, Akemi Yagi wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:57 AM, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 10:44, Alain Terriault
wrote:
> I am runing x86
On 17/02/2009, Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:33, Alan Bartlett wrote:
> > The subject line for this "conversation / thread" reads:
> > "Re: [CentOS-docs] [CentOS] Is the NFS lockd bug fixed ?"
> > The contents, however, relates to XFS & the CentOSPlus kernel.
> > Fi
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote:
>> Well Ralph, anyway, If I paste the 20 pages on the wiki, I will have the
>> problem with the licence. I want to be free to licence my documentation
>> with GFDL or another that could be enought free for me. And put pressure
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, moreni...@cdsl.cl wrote:
> here. And after have explained what and where I want to contribute, I was
> almost forced to re-licence or change the licence of my documentation (and
> you didn't think that someone could want to keep his freedom and publish
> his documentation with
Hardy Beltran Monasterios wrote:
> The other day I was looking for spanish version of CentOS Wiki, and
> currently there this link at the bottom main page:
>
> This wiki in Spanish.
>
> And in the spanish main page http://wiki.centos.org/es
> we have this link at the bottom
>
> Esta wiki en otr
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
> I suggest creating a new HowTos/XFS page with instructions on how to
> use XFS. I volunteer to write the current instructions on how to use
> it (on either the regular or the plus kernel).
>
> Then modify the page on CentOSPlus to point to that one (since now XFS
> ha
20 matches
Mail list logo
