On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Ed Heron wrote:
> From my point of view, the process wasn't onerous in itself. The only
> issues I had/have are the sparse guidelines of acceptable content and the
> voracity of the reaction, by some, to what they viewed as unacceptable
> content. It appears ther
From: "Ralph Angenendt", Tuesday, October 06, 2009 7:22 AM
>On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Ed Heron wrote:
>> From my point of view, the process wasn't onerous in itself. The only
>> issues I had/have are the sparse guidelines of acceptable content and the
>> voracity of the reaction, by some, t
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Ed Heron wrote:
> It appears that the people who are preferring the more restricted content
> guidelines are saying they will accept content separation. But having 2
> separate content systems seems redundant. Is there a way to have a section
> (directory) of the wiki that i
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 2:53 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009, Ed Heron wrote:
>
>> It appears that the people who are preferring the more restricted content
>> guidelines are saying they will accept content separation. But having 2
>> separate content systems seems redundant. Is ther
