On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 21:37 +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 03/04/2010 04:19 PM, Alan Bartlett wrote:
> > I concur. Let us (the CentOS forum community) see how it pans out,
> > whilst you keep an eye on it.
>
> Its interesting that you consider the 'forum community' to not be a part
> of the 'C
On 03/04/2010 04:19 PM, Alan Bartlett wrote:
> I concur. Let us (the CentOS forum community) see how it pans out,
> whilst you keep an eye on it.
Its interesting that you consider the 'forum community' to not be a part
of the 'CentOS community'. Maybe I am missing something, but surely a
communi
Ned Slider wrote on 03/04/2010 11:21 AM:
...
> Which is exactly the point of bringing it to this list for discussion,
> so what started life as a (suggestion for a) tool to assist forum
> community members/helpers may also be considered by helpers in other
> community support channels (i.e, IRC
Ralph's comments:
> I am not talking about flakey hardware, I am talking about the first
> solutions for running the nividia kernel in a dom0. Those lead to
> spontaneous reboots at least twice a day ...
> So if you say that it now is working and is stable - I have nothing
> against that article
Karanbir Singh wrote:
>
> I dont want to get in the way or be irritating, but if there is an
> attempt to do something, I dont see any harm in making that into a more
> useful tool that might benefit a few more people.
>
Which is exactly the point of bringing it to this list for discussion,
s
On 4 March 2010 15:51, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> I dont want to get in the way or be irritating,
I can publicly assure you that you are not. ;-)
> but if there is an
> attempt to do something, I dont see any harm in making that into a more
> useful tool that might benefit a few more people.
I co
On 03/04/2010 03:31 PM, Alan Bartlett wrote:
> Needless to say, what the *forum community* want out of it *has* been
> defined and a reference *has* been provided.
Where should I look to see this definition ? The forum thread is woolly
at best. It seems to start with a 'when I was ... we did ...
On 03/04/2010 09:31 AM, Alan Bartlett wrote:
> ...
> It can very easily be GPL'd. I suspect that Phil, PJ and Michael
> (pschaff, pjwelsh & michaelnel of the forum community) would be
> agreeable.
>
> Alan.
>
I (pjwelsh) have no issues with GPL'ing any minor contribution to this
script that I m
On 4 March 2010 14:27, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> So the issue here is :
> - define what we want out of it ( I am not sure this has been defined
> anywhere )
The pre-issue to that is a definition of "we", as used by KB, above.
Needless to say, what the *forum community* want out of it *has* been
d
On 03/04/2010 08:27 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> sos... is the *best* idea here...
Honestly, IMHO we are really looking for the proverbial "low hanging
fruit" of information. I suspect that not many are willing to dig
through the sysreport mountain of information. This forum is not really
a one sto
On 03/04/2010 01:54 PM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>>> Added an entry to http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General :
> Thanks for the comments Russ, but as Karanbir says, sysreport/sos
> provides a LOT of information. We were shooting at much smaller targets
> with the scripts. I should have mentioned - The
R P Herrold wrote on 03/03/2010 04:23 PM:
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>
>> Added an entry to http://wiki.centos.org/FAQ/General :
>>
>> 23. How do I provide appropriate information about my system when asking
>> questions?
>>
>> Comments, corrections, and other (constructive :-) )
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Cris Rhea wrote:
> Ralph:
>
> Is there a solution by now which is stable and does not
> spontaneously reboot your machine when you least expect it?
>
> Would that be more of a Tips and Tricks article? Or a longer HowTo?
>
> ---
> While I've certainly had some
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> On 03/03/2010 09:23 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
>> [herr...@centos-5 ~]$ rpm -qi sos
>> Name : sos
>
> the only issue with sos ( son of sysreport! ) is that it provides a lot
> of info, including many things that people would consider 'sen
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Geerd-Dietger Hoffmann wrote:
> On 02/03/2010 02:12, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
>> Centos ships with
>>
>> server 0.centos.pool.ntp.org
>> server 1.centos.pool.ntp.org
>> server 2.centos.pool.ntp.org
>>
>
> I just want to add something that people know t
Hi,
On 03/03/2010 09:23 PM, R P Herrold wrote:
> [herr...@centos-5 ~]$ rpm -qi sos
> Name: sos
the only issue with sos ( son of sysreport! ) is that it provides a lot
of info, including many things that people would consider 'sensitive' in
security and privacy terms. Not sure if I'd wan
16 matches
Mail list logo
