Re: [CentOS-docs] Documentation SIG

2014-03-13 Thread Jim Perrin
On 03/12/2014 09:39 AM, Tim Krupinski wrote: > Hey all - > > Just curious to find out if there's any activity with the documentation > SIG? I'd like to join. One thing i've noticed is that it seems like > documentation for CentOS ends at 5. While the documentation is more or > less mirrored f

Re: [CentOS-docs] Documentation SIG

2014-03-13 Thread Joe Brockmeier
On 03/13/2014 07:12 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > On 03/12/2014 09:39 AM, Tim Krupinski wrote: >> Hey all - >> >> Just curious to find out if there's any activity with the documentation >> SIG? I'd like to join. One thing i've noticed is that it seems like >> documentation for CentOS ends at 5. While

Re: [CentOS-docs] Documentation SIG

2014-03-13 Thread Pete Travis
On Mar 13, 2014 6:12 AM, "Jim Perrin" wrote: > > > > On 03/12/2014 09:39 AM, Tim Krupinski wrote: > > Hey all - > > > > Just curious to find out if there's any activity with the documentation > > SIG? I'd like to join. One thing i've noticed is that it seems like > > documentation for CentOS end

Re: [CentOS-docs] Documentation SIG

2014-03-13 Thread Tim Krupinski
Thanks for the info. I just checked Redhat's support site, and it appears the docs are licensed as such: This document is licensed by Red Hat under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License . If you distribute thi

Re: [CentOS-docs] Documentation SIG

2014-03-13 Thread Jim Perrin
On 03/13/2014 08:44 AM, Tim Krupinski wrote: > Thanks for the info. I just checked Redhat's support site, and it > appears the docs are licensed as such: > > This document is licensed by Red Hat under the Creative Commons > Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License >