On 21 February 2010 03:43, Phil Schaffner p.r.schaff...@ieee.org wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 18:37 -0600, donavan nelson wrote:
I suspect if you tried with 6G you would significantly less than 5.1G
used post install.
Agreed, as previous tests showed. Doesn't help much with estimating the
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Ralph Angenendt
ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 21.02.10 15:09, schrieb Alan Bartlett:
I guess the real question is: What was that section of the web page
*really* intending to show when it was first written? Perhaps Donavan
can remember?
I know it was
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 18:37 -0600, donavan nelson wrote:
I suspect if you tried with 6G you would significantly less than 5.1G
used post install.
Agreed, as previous tests showed. Doesn't help much with estimating the
minimum requirement if the OS won't install, and a practical system
needs
On 19 February 2010 16:01, Ralph Angenendt ralph.angene...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org wrote:
Whilst wearing you C-devel hat, will you please have a look at a
recent forum thread [1] that has highlighted the ambiguity on the
CentOS Product
Phil Schaffner wrote:
Phil Schaffner wrote on 02/19/2010 05:29 PM:
Phil Schaffner wrote on 02/19/2010 05:17 PM:
...Could run an i386 install too, but this is
probably good enough.
Just for grins - tried the i386 install with 1GB RAM on a 3GB disk and
got an error that it needed 1924MB and
