Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> > I just didn't get to do it properly during the last three months. Things
> > look
> > a bit brighter now, this is one of the first things I wanted to do in the
> > new
> > year.
>
> we more-or-less have a nice kickass server to replace wiki-m's
Ralph Angenendt wrote:
> I just didn't get to do it properly during the last three months. Things look
> a bit brighter now, this is one of the first things I wanted to do in the new
> year.
we more-or-less have a nice kickass server to replace wiki-m's platform
with, should be setup in a few wee
Dag Wieers wrote:
> - Easier to register
>
> We have discussed this before, what is the current status ?
Quite ready. We have people who want to be on the "Editorial Team", there
will be an alias for them on the mail server. The registration page has to
be changed (a "preview" of that has b
Hi,
Let me first stress that the success of the wiki is tight to how many
users find it as a resource. And that users will only find the wiki for
their problems if it has a higher PageRank.
(I am using PageRank as an example, other search engines would do
better if we can implement some change
