[CentOS-docs] KVM article update

2013-06-08 Thread Scott Robbins
As anyone who has looked at it knows, the KVM article, which was primarily written by me, is way out of date and really only covers CentOS 5. (Someone has added a link to the main RH docs page.) The top section, covers CentOS 6 in one sentence. The other day, I was playing with it and came

Re: [CentOS-docs] KVM article update

2013-06-08 Thread Christoph Galuschka
Am 08.06.2013 13:41, schrieb Scott Robbins: As anyone who has looked at it knows, the KVM article, which was primarily written by me, is way out of date and really only covers CentOS 5. (Someone has added a link to the main RH docs page.) The top section, covers CentOS 6 in one sentence.

Re: [CentOS-docs] KVM article update

2013-06-08 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 03:10:58PM +0200, Christoph Galuschka wrote: Am 08.06.2013 13:41, schrieb Scott Robbins: As anyone who has looked at it knows, the KVM article, which was primarily written by me, is way out of date and really only covers CentOS 5. (Someone has added a link to the

Re: [CentOS-docs] KVM article update

2013-06-08 Thread Alan Bartlett
On 8 June 2013 15:41, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 03:10:58PM +0200, Christoph Galuschka wrote: Am 08.06.2013 13:41, schrieb Scott Robbins: As anyone who has looked at it knows, the KVM article, which was primarily written by me, is way out of date and

Re: [CentOS-docs] KVM article update

2013-06-08 Thread Scott Robbins
On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 03:44:07PM +0100, Alan Bartlett wrote: On 8 June 2013 15:41, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 03:10:58PM +0200, Christoph Galuschka wrote: Added. I hope in a way that is ok this way. Well, I tested it and it worked. :) In