On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 10:09 -0400, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Alan Bartlett wrote:
> ...
> > Pedantically and ignoring the RAID aspect, just looking at the
> > equations scientifically, I would say that only the first one is wrong
> > as (64K / 4K) = 16, not 16K. It should be expressed as (64 / 4)K =
On 29/05/2009, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Phil Schaffner
> wrote:
>
> > Alan Bartlett wrote:
>
> >> Perhaps the original author would care to comment and adjust where
> necessary?
> >>
> >> Alan.
>
>
> > but the conclusion is still that the original
> > author nee
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:09 AM, Phil Schaffner
wrote:
> Alan Bartlett wrote:
>> Perhaps the original author would care to comment and adjust where necessary?
>>
>> Alan.
> but the conclusion is still that the original
> author needs to respond, or failing that somebody else needs to fix the
>
Alan Bartlett wrote:
...
> Pedantically and ignoring the RAID aspect, just looking at the
> equations scientifically, I would say that only the first one is wrong
> as (64K / 4K) = 16, not 16K. It should be expressed as (64 / 4)K =
> 16K.
>
> The other two lines do read correctly but, in the spiri
On 29/05/2009, Timothy Lee wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> In "HowTos/Disk_Optimization", the calculated value of stride size and
> stripe width appears to have the "K" suffix incorrectly appended to them.
> Eg:
>
>
> (64K/4K) = 16K
> (3*16K) = 48K
>
> (16K+16K) = 32K The values provided on the mkfs.ex
Dear all,
In "HowTos/Disk_Optimization", the calculated value of stride size and
stripe width appears to have the "K" suffix incorrectly appended to
them. Eg:
* (64K/4K) = 16K
* (3*16K) = 48K
* (16K+16K) = 32K
The values provided on the mkfs.ext3 command line however, do drop the
