On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 2:43 PM, John Thomas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Hollis wrote:
>>
>> Is there any detail on when you would actually need to use the
>> clocksource= option? I'd love to not have to deal with the kernel-vm
>> packages since there doesn't appear to be a repo for them ye
David Hollis wrote:
Is there any detail on when you would actually need to use the
clocksource= option? I'd love to not have to deal with the kernel-vm
packages since there doesn't appear to be a repo for them yet and if you
have other requirements like kmod-drbd you have to manually rebuild
tho
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 06:04 -0700, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> > This bug report: http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=2189 seems to suggest
> > clocksource=pit and divider=10 will crash kernels and I did not see "it's
> > fixed" in the release notes.
>
> Right, so, if you do not need the clocksource= opti
Has someone already upgraded a machine with the Xen 3.2 packages from
http://www.xen.org/download/dl_32rhel5.html to CentOS 5.2? Problems?
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
___
On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 4:57 AM, John Thomas
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for all the great stuff.
>
> Executive Summary: Kernel Parameters or Special Kernel for 5.2 on VMWare?
>
> More Details:
> Is it the best practice to use the specially compiled kernels (when
> available, typically her
Thanks for all the great stuff.
Executive Summary: Kernel Parameters or Special Kernel for 5.2 on VMWare?
More Details:
Is it the best practice to use the specially compiled kernels (when
available, typically here:
http://people.centos.org/~tru/kernel-vm/5/RPMS/i386/ ) or are kernel
paramete
