Hi,
I've been using CentOS Xen on a server that has 2 VM's configured. The
default configuration includes one physical iface that is propagated (by a
default bridge) to the VM's.
Since I wanted to configure additional physical iface, define a new bridge
and propagate it to the viface-s of the
Hi,
2011/11/18 Matija Draganović mdra...@gmail.com:
I've been using CentOS Xen on a server that has 2 VM's configured. The
default configuration includes one physical iface that is propagated (by a
default bridge) to the VM's.
You do not mention which version of CentOS and Xen you are using?
Dear Peter,
Thanks for your reply. I was so occupied with troubleshooting that I forgot
to mention the OS Xen version :)
My CentOS version is
CentOS release 5.7 (Final)
Linux 2.6.18-274.7.1.el5xen #1 SMP Thu Oct 20 17:06:34 EDT 2011 x86_64
x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
and Xen v3.0.
I tried
Running on Centos 5.6 with KVM...
I was wondering if anyone had any luck configuring the NICs where eth0 and eth1
are bonded together with vlan support to a bridge?
I noticed some threads show this as a possibility
(http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-virt/2009-November/001417.html), but
I tried to remove vifname and vif-script but the problem remains. I think
that the bridges are ok, but for some reason VM's hang when they try to
connect their vifaces to them.
I'll try some different configurations of the physical ifaces (an vifaces
also), maybe I'll be able to find out