On 26.01.2021 20:24, Scott Dowdle wrote:
Ok, so you are turning off SELinux and using ZFS too? And you still want to
stay with EL? Why?
RHEL is more stable than Ubuntu, it has 10 year support and rpm installs
silently without additional questions and dialogues, as it in deb world.
dnf / yum
On 26.01.2021 18:41, Scott Dowdle wrote:
Have you tried LXD?
Not yet. My first post on this mailing list
asked if anyone was using LXC in production:
Does anyone use LXC and/or systemd-nspawn
containers on RHEL 8 / CentOS 8 for production?
What are advantages and disadvantages of each of the
On 26.01.2021 0:05, Scott Dowdle wrote:
OpenVZ 7 has no updates, and therefore is not suitable for production.
The free updates lag behind the paid Virtuozzo 7 version and plenty of people
are using it in production. I'm not one of those.
See all released OpenVZ 7 updates:
http://ftp.neti
On 25.01.2021 22:24, Scott Dowdle wrote:
I found only two possible free/open source alternatives for OpenVZ 6:
- LXC
- systemd-nspawn
Some you seem to have overlooked?!?
1) OpenVZ 7
2) LXD from Canonical that is part of Ubuntu
3) podman containers with systemd installed (set /sbin/init as t
Hello All,
OpenVZ 6 in the past was a very popular technology
for creating OS-level virtualization containers.
But OpenVZ 6 is EOL now (because RHEL 6 / CentOS 6 is EOL)
and all OpenVZ 6 users should migrate to some alternatives.
I found only two possible free/open source alternatives for OpenV
On 15.05.2018 13:52, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
failure: repodata/repomd.xml from centos-qemu-ev: [Errno 256] No more
mirrors to try.
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/
repodata/repomd.xml: [Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found
Something wrong with $contentdir variable,
Hello, Sandro!
On 15.05.2018 13:24, Gena Makhomed wrote:
failure: repodata/repomd.xml from centos-qemu-ev: [Errno 256] No more
mirrors to try.
http://mirror.centos.org/altarch/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/repodata/repomd.xml:
[Errno 14] HTTP Error 404 - Not Found
I found workaround:
# diff -u
Hello, Sandro!
On 11.05.2018 12:19, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Sadly, the new qemu-kvm-ev we prepared for CentOS 7.5 didn't get released (
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14764) but the new build is ready.
After installing CentOS 7.5 and installing package qemu-kvm-ev
I can't install KVM on
On 14.03.2017 20:05, Gena Makhomed wrote:
When I use "VirtIO SCSI controller" in virt-manager,
and when I install Windows Server 2012 R2 -
I can use only viostor driver and can't use vioscsi driver,
Windows Server 2012 R2 can't load vioscsi driver (?)
from virtio-win.iso and
On 15.03.2017 17:42, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote:
When I use "VirtIO SCSI controller" in virt-manager,
and when I install Windows Server 2012 R2 -
I can use only viostor driver and can't use vioscsi driver,
Windows Server 2012 R2 can't load vioscsi driver (?)
from virtio-win.iso and did not see virtua
Hello, All!
virtio-win.iso contains two different Windows drivers.
these Windows Server 2012 R2 drivers have different hardware IDs:
\vioscsi\2k12R2\amd64\vioscsi.inf
"Red Hat VirtIO SCSI pass-through controller"
PCI\VEN_1AF4&DEV_1004&SUBSYS_00081AF4&REV_00
PCI\VEN_1AF4&DEV_1048&SUBSYS_11001AF4&
On 30.11.2015 19:02, Jean-Marc LIGER wrote:
Is it possible to add patch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758
into qemu-kvm-ev from Red Hat, oVirt and cbs/centos ?
Could you rediff this patch for qemu-kvm-ev 2.3.0 series ?
I am already wasting too many time for this patch...
On 29.10.2015 0:00, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
it will be in http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/virt/x86_64/kvm-common/
enabled by
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/extras/x86_64/Packages/centos-release-qemu-ev-1.0-1.el7.noarch.rpm
Is it possible to add patch
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.c
On 18.08.2015 14:44, C. L. Martinez wrote:
How can I add some options to qemu command line when a kvm guest
starts up from libvirtd??
# virsh edit vm-name
1. change first line from to
2. add
before tag
3. if you need qemu options for adding SLIC table - also you need
pa
On 31.07.2015 10:19, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758
Have you checked 3.5.4 RC or CentOS Virt SIG[2]
to see if the bug has been fixed in latest qemu-kvm-ev ?
[1] http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5-pre/
[2] http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kv
On 30.07.2015 15:25, Sandro Bonazzola wrote:
Note that qemu-kvm-ev
is built within Virt SIG too in kvm-common-testing CBS repo
Packages from kvm-common-testing
probably is not a good choice for using in production environment.
I found in internet package
http://cbs.centos.org/repos/virt7-kvm-
On 30.07.2015 10:49, Nux! wrote:
Then you should definitely submit a bug with redhat about this, seems like a
serious one.
Ok, done:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758
P.S.
As I can see - bugzilla.redhat.com for oVirt Product
does not contain qemu-kvm-ev Component at all -
On 29.07.2015 21:34, Nux! wrote:
Yes, you can.
In fact you can use the binaries from the ovirt repo itself, no need to rebuild.
Thank you!
In fact - I can't use raw binaries from the ovirt repo itself,
because these qemu-kvm binaries contains one bug,
which is already fixed in Debian:
If you
Hello, All!
Is it possible to use binary packages build from
http://resources.ovirt.org/pub/ovirt-3.5/rpm/el7/SRPMS/qemu-kvm-ev-2.1.2-23.el7_1.3.1.src.rpm
with plain CentOS 7.1 and use all other packages from CentOS
(libvirt, virt-manager, etc)
Is it have reasons, if I not use live migrations an
19 matches
Mail list logo
