>
> I see the ability to run "top" as a normal user on a KVM host and see what
> the guests are up to as a big advantage. Sure, one can run xentop on Xen,
> but only if you have root access.
>
If you have at least read only access to libvirt virt-top is nice to get
more detail on guest stats...
H
Thanks for the clarification.
On 17 Aug 2010 17:57, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 09:35:24AM +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
>> >
>> > Uh.. are you mixing Xen and KVM now?
>> >
>> > I think KVM *always* requires the kernel mo
>
> Uh.. are you mixing Xen and KVM now?
>
> I think KVM *always* requires the kernel module, aka CPU support for hardware
> virtualization.
>
> -- Pasi
>
You might be right... having trouble googling something... but I
thought that kvm without -enable-kvm (or with -no-kvm) and with
-kernel, -app
On 16 August 2010 16:22, Tom Bishop wrote:
>
> "I put together a simple conversion method I used at work to move from
> vmware to KVM - happy t opost the instructions if needed."
>
>
> That would be good I have read several things but would be nice to see.
> I'm not sure how much vmware server
On 16 August 2010 15:55, Tom Bishop wrote:
> Just so you guys don't think I'm off my rocker...well not totally anyway ;)
> I did come across this post in fedora forum that got me to think it might
> work
>
>
> Currently, I have VMware Server 2.0 and KVM on the same headless machine
> with 4G m
On 16 August 2010 15:11, Danilo Nascimento
wrote:
> I think that you can use the qemu without the kvm / kvm-(intel|amd) module.
> But i hardly think that VMware will still running with the KVM module loaded
>
Only paravirtualised guests (so compatible linux) and not fully
virtualised... that requ
