Re: [CentOS-virt] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#?

2008-01-22 Thread Brett Worth
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > After seeing this same issue on my Xen 3.2 install, but with NO > migration or iSCSI happening I decided it is probably NOT iSCSI's > fault, so I decided to research it a little more and this is what > I found: > > http://docs.xensource.com/XenServer/4.0.1/guest/ch04s08.h

RE: [CentOS-virt] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#?

2008-01-22 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
Ross S. W. Walker wrote: > > Brett Worth wrote: > > > > Hello All. > > > > I've just started looking into Xen and have a test > > environment in place. I'm seeing an > > annoying problem that I thought worthy of a post. > > > > Config: > > > > I have 2 x HP DL585 servers each with 4 Dual cor

RE: [CentOS-virt] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#?

2008-01-22 Thread Ross S. W. Walker
Brett Worth wrote: > > Hello All. > > I've just started looking into Xen and have a test > environment in place. I'm seeing an > annoying problem that I thought worthy of a post. > > Config: > > I have 2 x HP DL585 servers each with 4 Dual core Opterons > (non-vmx) and 16GB RAM > configured

Re: [CentOS-virt] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#?

2008-01-21 Thread Eli Stair
My un-authoritative answer: I've been tracking this bug (or several with the same symptoms) for going on a couple years. It's ridiculously common, apparently well known to the Xen/Xensource guys judging by the number of reports/bugs posted, but I haven't seen mention of it actually being add

[CentOS-virt] BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#?

2008-01-19 Thread Brett Worth
Hello All. I've just started looking into Xen and have a test environment in place. I'm seeing an annoying problem that I thought worthy of a post. Config: I have 2 x HP DL585 servers each with 4 Dual core Opterons (non-vmx) and 16GB RAM configured as Xen servers. These run CentOS 5.1 with t