On 11/15/2010 09:00 AM, compdoc wrote:
> It's still useful, but why invest in an older technology when the newer
> technology is there and doesn't cost more?
>
Because it *does* cost more and doesn't (in my case) provide anything
special I need feature wise. I already had a nice hot swappable 2U
It's still useful, but why invest in an older technology when the newer
technology is there and doesn't cost more?
100baseT switches are still being sold, but it's a bad idea to buy one...
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://li
On 11/14/2010 05:25 PM, compdoc wrote:
> Unless you have old cards you have to retain, PCI-x isn't useful anymore.
> Too slow.
>
Depends on what you consider 'too slow'. I just benchmarked an 8 drive
software RAID6 (8 x 1.5 TByte Seagate drives) on a PCI-X card (Areca
ARC-1120 configured for JBO
On 11/14/2010 05:25 PM, compdoc wrote:
> Unless you have old cards you have to retain, PCI-x isn't useful anymore.
> Too slow.
Supermicro X8SAX:
2 (x16) PCI-Express 2.0,
1 (x4) PCI-Express (using X8 slot),
2x 64-bit 133/100MHz PCI-X,
1x 32-bit PCI Slots
I put the video and the RAID
Unless you have old cards you have to retain, PCI-x isn't useful anymore.
Too slow.
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
On 11/14/2010 03:11 PM, Kenni Lund wrote:
> ...and the current 64-bit updates:
> http://mirror.stanford.edu/yum/pub/centos/5.5/updates/x86_64/RPMS/
> which contains several kvm-packages, with the latest being
> kvm-83-164.el5_5.23.x86_64.rpm.
Guess I will just have to upgrade my office computer to
2010/11/14 MargoAndTodd :
> On 11/13/2010 07:44 AM, compdoc wrote:
>>> $ uname -r -m
>>> 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 i686
>>>
>>> $ rpm -qa \*kvm\*
>>> kvm-36-1
>>> kmod-kvm-36-3
>>>
>>>
>>> Not even close to 83. :-(
>>
>> My centos 5.5 has kvm 83. I'm not sure how you got that old stuff
>
> I am 32 bit.
On 11/13/2010 07:44 AM, compdoc wrote:
>> $ uname -r -m
>> 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 i686
>>
>> $ rpm -qa \*kvm\*
>> kvm-36-1
>> kmod-kvm-36-3
>>
>>
>> Not even close to 83. :-(
>
> My centos 5.5 has kvm 83. I'm not sure how you got that old stuff
I am 32 bit.
yum install kvm kmod-kvm
On 11/13/2010 02:06 AM, Kenni Lund wrote:
> 2010/11/13 MargoAndTodd:
>> On 11/11/2010 01:50 PM, Kenni Lund wrote:
>>> No, you're not running an old version of qemu-kvm in CentOS. Like most
>>> other packages, Red Hat has selected an (old and stable) version as
>>> the baseline version and then back
On 11/13/2010 02:05 AM, Kenni Lund wrote:
> 2010/11/13 MargoAndTodd:
>> On 11/11/2010 01:50 PM, Kenni Lund wrote:
>>> You'll never need to run it from the command line, use the available
>>> management tools (libvirt+virsh from the command line,
>>> libvirt+virt-manager from X11), it makes your lif
> $ uname -r -m
> 2.6.18-194.26.1.el5 i686
>
> $ rpm -qa \*kvm\*
> kvm-36-1
> kmod-kvm-36-3
>
>
> Not even close to 83. :-(
My centos 5.5 has kvm 83. I'm not sure how you got that old stuff
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://li
2010/11/13 Mathieu Baudier :
>> kvm-83. That said, as you've probably already read in the docs, KVM is
>> a "technology preview" in RHEL 5.x...6.0 will be the first version
>> with official/stable KVM support by Red Hat.
>
> My understanding is that KVM was tech preview in RHEL/CentOS 5.4 and
> off
2010/11/13 MargoAndTodd :
> On 11/11/2010 01:50 PM, Kenni Lund wrote:
>> No, you're not running an old version of qemu-kvm in CentOS. Like most
>> other packages, Red Hat has selected an (old and stable) version as
>> the baseline version and then backported bugfixes and new features
>> from newer
2010/11/13 MargoAndTodd :
> On 11/11/2010 01:50 PM, Kenni Lund wrote:
>> You'll never need to run it from the command line, use the available
>> management tools (libvirt+virsh from the command line,
>> libvirt+virt-manager from X11), it makes your life much much easier.
>> I've been running qemu-k
> kvm-83. That said, as you've probably already read in the docs, KVM is
> a "technology preview" in RHEL 5.x...6.0 will be the first version
> with official/stable KVM support by Red Hat.
My understanding is that KVM was tech preview in RHEL/CentOS 5.4 and
officially supported from RHEL/CentOS 5.
On 11/11/2010 01:50 PM, Kenni Lund wrote:
> No, you're not running an old version of qemu-kvm in CentOS. Like most
> other packages, Red Hat has selected an (old and stable) version as
> the baseline version and then backported bugfixes and new features
> from newer versions of the package, to fulf
On 11/11/2010 01:50 PM, Kenni Lund wrote:
> You'll never need to run it from the command line, use the available
> management tools (libvirt+virsh from the command line,
> libvirt+virt-manager from X11), it makes your life much much easier.
> I've been running qemu-kvm from the command line for sev
2010/11/11 MargoAndTodd :
> On 11/10/2010 08:31 PM, Mark Pryor wrote:
>>
>>
>> --- On Wed, 11/10/10, jaye...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>> From: jaye...@gmail.com
>>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] KVM: where are the directions?
>>> To: "Discuss
On 11/10/2010 08:31 PM, Mark Pryor wrote:
>
>
> --- On Wed, 11/10/10, jaye...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> From: jaye...@gmail.com
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] KVM: where are the directions?
>> To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
>> Date: We
--- On Wed, 11/10/10, jaye...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: jaye...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] KVM: where are the directions?
> To: "Discussion about the virtualization on CentOS"
> Date: Wednesday, November 10, 2010, 7:15 PM
> rpm -ql kvm
> rpm -qa | g
On 11/10/2010 07:15 PM, jaye...@gmail.com wrote:
> rpm -ql kvm
> rpm -qa | grep kvm
>
> /sys/john == /dev/BlackBerry
Not sure what you are trying to say. The "ql" is
a cool way to see where everything is installed.
Thank you,
-T
___
CentOS-virt mailing
On 11/10/2010 07:50 PM, MargoAndTodd wrote:
> On 11/10/2010 07:12 PM, MargoAndTodd wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have been Googling my rear off. Where is the manual for KVM? It seems
>> like the information is just all thrown about. Anyone know of a
>> manual? A pdf?
>> A home page with instruction
On 11/10/2010 07:12 PM, MargoAndTodd wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have been Googling my rear off. Where is the manual for KVM? It seems
> like the information is just all thrown about. Anyone know of a
> manual? A pdf?
> A home page with instructions? I am teachable (mostly).
>
> Many thanks,
> -T
rpm -ql kvm
rpm -qa | grep kvm
/sys/john == /dev/BlackBerry
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-virt
Hi All,
I have been Googling my rear off. Where is the manual for KVM? It seems
like the information is just all thrown about. Anyone know of a
manual? A pdf?
A home page with instructions? I am teachable (mostly).
Many thanks,
-T
___
CentOS-virt
25 matches
Mail list logo
